10:10 No Pressure Explodes! Will It Be Like November 17, 2009?

The graphic 10:10 No Pressure clip showing sceptics and children getting blown up to pieces has now swept the blogosphere and is being met with outrage and condemnation. Even the warmists sites are distancing themselves and condemning it.

It has exploded into a scandal. Call it 10:10-gate.

Indeed it may be as significant as November 17, 2009, the date the Climategate scandal broke out. (The exact date may be a day or two later).

The video by itself appears to some viewers as just another twisted Hollywood type of production one would expect from Robert Rodrigues or Quentin Tarantino, with some injection of morbid humour. But it is now becoming the straw that may break the enviro-activist backbone.

The problem with the 10:10 No Pressureclip is that no Oxburgh commission will be able to whitewash the graphic pictures away.

The gory and bloody pictures of exploding sceptic kids serve to underscore a trend that has been long been in development. It focuses the spotlight on a pattern of violence and intolerance that now is running rampant through the entire environmental movement.

Activists have resorted to intimidation, persecution and villification of sceptics who do not agree with the doomsday scenarios of catastrophic climate change. Examples have piled up over the years.

The straws that broke the back:

Persecute and execute-gate and here (NEW!) and here (NEW!)
Warmist zealots use threats and intimidation to suppress free speech and thought in science.

Authoritarian science-gate
The science says… Science is increasingly used as an instrument of authority to impose public policy.

Black list-gate and herehere and William Anderegg and here
Sceptic scientists are branded and listed by largely discredited, angry alarmist NAS scientists.

One of the sleepers awakens.

Suspend-democracy-gate and suspend journalism
Alarmists want to suspend democracy for a while to save us from catastrophe.

Greenpeace exploits and brainwashes a child to make a hate speech.

Militant Greenpeace activists recklessly invade oil platform, putting workers lives at risk.

EPA bureaucracy attempts to unconstitutionally seize regulatory power without consent from Congress in attempt to dictate ever aspect of human life.

Wikipedia William Connelly-gate
Green Party member Connelly censors and rewrites Wikipedia.

Gore attempts to have mentor Revelle’s name removed from a sceptic scientific article, after he died!

Now the chickens are coming home to roost. In response to the outrage and embarrassment, the clip has been taken down. It’s producers say “sorry”. But it’s too little, too late.

21 thoughts on “10:10 No Pressure Explodes! Will It Be Like November 17, 2009?”

  1. I was thinking the same thing. Ha, ha, not even 12 months before another supreme cock-up. I’m not sure that the 10:10 campaign will survive.

    The interesting part will be how many non climate related sites pick up on it. It was weeks before Climategate really got going. I wonder if it will be picked up as an issue for the US elections? Now that really would be a game changer.

    1. HotAir has it up. I’d expect that soon the American Spectator, WSJ, American Thinker, Matt Drudge, talk radio will pick up on it soon. Then it’s 10:10-gate!
      Looks like it is the last straw.

  2. Now they say they didn’t REALLY want to blow up people:
    “Doing nothing about climate change is still a fairly common affliction, even in this day and age. What to do with those people, who are together threatening everybody’s existence on this planet? Clearly we don’t really think they should be blown up, that’s just a joke for the mini-movie, but maybe a little amputating would be a good place to start? […] We ‘killed’ five people to make No Pressure – a mere blip compared to the 300,000 real people who now die each year from climate change.

    “”Franny Armstrong, founder of 10:10[42]”


    Okay, amputations… So if they approach me, i’ll be happy to play some amputation games with them… I warned them via e-mail to protect their groins when they approach me.

    Very funny people. I’m really eager to meat one of them and exercise a little self defense.

    1. Oops – Freudian slip – make that “meet” instead of “meat”.

      Looks like i’m getting into the mood…

  3. This is only the beginning.
    These people will never give up.
    They will continue to push their sick doctrine until the banks have their cap & trade and they have all the legal backing roll out Green Terror regime.

    We have to fight them to our last breath or we will loose our freedom and our prosperity.

    This is the worst doctrine that emerged after the Communists USSR.

    It’s more dangerous and more lethal than the Cold War.

    Already people are dying and the numbers will run of the scale if we allow these morons to get what they’re after.

    These guys belong behind bars.
    Together with the politicians who are in support of the 2 degree max temperature rise.

    These people are not only morons because there is no way we will be able to control the temperature of our oceans and our atmosphere but they are the worst kind of cheats not only failing their electorate but perpetrate treason to humanity and our civilization.

    We have to vote them out of office at the next possible opportunity and prosecute them until they are locked up for life.

  4. I refuse to watch to 10:10 video. My reason? The Guardian article on Pentti Linkola last month. I then did some follow up research. I still don’t know if he is real, but the 10:10 video reinforces to me an undercurrent in the environmental movement which is concerning, to be polite.

  5. This is the kind of thinking that Stalin and Mao Tse Tung would have been so proud of, any violence or death is ok for the ’cause’.

    Meanwhile back in the real world, the guys that really count (BILDERBERG) are discussing what’s really going on which is Global COOLING …


  6. This is clearly a major stuff up by the warmists, but I’m beginning to wonder about Richard Curtis. Is it not conceivable than he is actually on our side, and has produced this vile piece of trash to illustrate just what obscene lengths the eco-totalitarians will tolerate.

    Surely he was wanting to see how far he could go for just one person to say “hey, you can’t do this, this makes us look like the Khymer Rouge”. But no, these eco-warriors sat through the pitch, the mock ups, the rushes and the previews, and they all thought it was a great idea.

    Very revealing as to the mindset involved, I suggest. Thanks Richard, you really showed them up!

    1. Good question. But I really doubt Curtis is on “our side”. It’s a case where he’s so far left, that he’s far right.
      No, these people are so disconnected from reality that I’m sure they thought it was really cool and hip, that the teens would love it. Like cool! The infidels are blowing up dude. They think all teens are Beavis and Butthead or something. .
      These people are twisted sickos.
      Of course, everyone in their little elite circle thought the clip was cool and sophisticated – even funny, until of course it was released to the real world. There the reaction was opposite.

  7. I made my decision; I’m boycotting Sony too. Not because of the clip itself, but because it has aligned itself with a kook and violent movement.

Comments are closed.