Here I am not talking about man, as in mankind, but men, i.e. males.
In the German state of Bavaria, children of the advanced secondary schools, aged 13-14, are required to take a reading comprehension test. The text used to do this is a report about climate change titled: “Ist der Klimawandel ein Mann?” (Is Climate Change A Man?)” Hat-tip German blog site info.kopp-verlag.de.
The main message of the text is that men, with their macho lifestyles, produce far more CO2 than women and thus the planet is suffering because of it. The text cites scientific studies (from women) and presents claims made by the studies as fact.
The text begins:
Is climate change a man?
Steaks and cars, both as big as possible. That is – precisely typical male. ‘Thus climate change is a man.’ This is how provocatively Ines Weller, a professor in Bremen, formulated her arguments: On average men eat more meat and drive swankier, fuel guzzling cars, preferably fast. In the end, both increase the global emission of CO2. What’s worse, says Weller, is that men often do not want to change their behavior. Therefore the contribute more to global climate change than women. Women eat more fruit and vegetables and drive mostly small, fuel-saving cars and they drive less kilometers each year. They use, Weller says, public transportation considerably more often.”
That’s just the first introductory paragraph. Right from the start children here learn that men are worse for the environment, are more wasteful, and they are unwilling to change. It gets worse. The text continues:
Gotelind Alber, environmental expert and physicist, confirms the Bremen study almost completely. In addition one could say that women, even though they contribute less to climate change, are often hit harder by its impacts. This is especially true for women in poorer countries, where they are busy with providing for the family. And that will become increasingly more difficult as environmental conditions become more acute.”
Not only are men being made responsible for climate change, but they are also getting blamed for the hardships women in poor countries have to endure.
Men drive bigger cars
The text then asks just how much is the contribution to climate change made by men and women. This is a difficult question to answer, the text says. This is why the researchers studied single-person households. The text provides some results:
On average male single households produce more CO2 than female single households. In Sweden, for example, its a plus of 30%. Namely Swedish men almost always drive the bigger car. That was the case for more or less every European country, said Alber.”
Men eat more climate-killing meat
The German children learn from the text that men’s eating habits are also posing a big problem for the climate and environment.
And how does it look with nutrition? Studies conducted by an Austrian environment institute have shown that more than 20% of global CO2 emissions come from the production and transport of foodstuffs. The biggest share here is clearly from the production of meat. Studies further show that men eat far more meat than women. The ‘beef calculation’ made by climate experts yields: The production of one kilogram of steak alone causes 36.4 kilograms of CO2. Thus also in this area men appear to be the climate violators.”
The fourth paragraph of the text serves as a fig leaf in an attempt to hide the text’s obvious attack on the male gender, adding that women are producing more CO2 in their consumption of milk products, cosmetics and clothing. But in total, men are much worse.
The text ends with:
Moreover: women think differently than men; they tend to be more open to doing something for the overall public good. Women, who are more often there for the family than men, are used to thinking of others,’ says Alber. Men on the other hand are environmentally conscious when it does not cost anything.”
Clearly the text conveys that men are less desirable than women, and that they are more to blame for the world’s ills. But this is not to say that the world would be a better place without men. The real message is: “The world would be a far better place if women ran it. Men would be better serving as their slaves. 🙂 The environmental movement is not a war on humanity – it’s a war on men.
German blog sites react to the text
Gerhard Wisnewski of Kopp online here writes:
The indoctrination in German schools is already well advanced and no longer even holds back with with-hunting propaganda. […] here kids are learning that the world would be much better without men. […] this is all about pure gender fascism. […] Our state ‘educational institutes’ don’t hold back in denouncing and defaming an entire half of the population.”
Dr. habil. Heike Diefenbach and Michael Klein here:
The blatant method in which hate is being funneled to German schoolchildren age 13-14, the perfidious manner in which distrust is being generated between the genders among the youth at German schools where they are being told: You as a male person are faulty, but you have the chance to purify yourself and to become unmanly, no longer borders on indoctrination. It goes far beyond that and reminds us more of the education camps where Nicolae Ceaușescu drilled his body guards. It reminds us of the initiation rites that Heinrich Himmler conducted in his dream palace Wewelsburg. […] This has absolutely nothing to do with the educating and upbringing the youth to be independent and critical members of their societies.”
Diefenbach and Klein add that this type of indoctrination is a “primitive form of manipulation and conditioning of the youth.”
Western education system hostile to males
Years ago it seemed that Germany’s advanced secondary education (Gymnasium) was about 50/50 male-female. Today I can’t help but notice that this has shifted markedly. In my son’s and daughter’s class it was more like two thirds girls and only one third boys. I don’t know what the situation is like in other European countries. It just seems that education system is becoming increasingly hostile to males. In the USA, if I’m not mistaken, more women are completing higher education than men.
So men, get back to the books and do your homework. Otherwise you may wake up one day soon finding yourself in shackles, in the servitude of women. Heck, I know plenty of men who today are perfectly content with that! 🙂
Of course the thing is absolutely ridiculous. It is not men in general who cause climate change, but only white men. (Well, Asians maybe, if they belong to successful industrial nations.) Members of the Ummah are also except – they are honorary womyn, all of them.
Thank you for translating this “school material” in English and for making it available for a broader audience. I hope the “school material” about the inferior male which for me satisfies any scientific condition for classifying it as racist (unfounded generalisation and negative attribution) gets the international awareness it deserves. This material is the so-called tip of the iceberg and the result of state feminism undermining the German educational system for years. In schools it is a well-known fact that boys under perform to a degree that can only be explained by structural variables (with institutional discrimination being one of them). Boys have a higher chance to get transferred to so-called “Sonderschulen” dedicated to “help children with problems in learning or behavioural problems” and in almost 95% of the cases Sonderschulen “help” these children to achieve no educational degree. Boys reach the higher echelons of secondary education to a considerably lower amount as girls, which we have been trying to explain for years now and I, for one, have come to the conclusion that this is due to discrimination (because nothing else explains the pattern). The list is almost endless. It seems merit has been replaced with Gender in the German educational system. This certainly holds true for the German Universities. Programs like the “Professorinnenprogramm” make sure, that the position of ordinary Professor is offered only to female applicants. This is called “positive action”, an euphemism for simple discrimination. I could go on with this for pages, however, it would only stress the point that in Germany state feminism is on the brink of transforming a once successful educational system into a means for ideological warfare, warfare against man and what they stand for: rationalism, power, hedonism, innovation, liberalism, you name it.
We have stacks of material describing the shift from merit to gender, from liberalism to socialism. Whoever is interested:
sciencefiles@textconsulting.net
Like I said, when a class in the Gymnasium has 21 girls and 8 boys, like I’ve seen in one case at our local Gymnasium, then you have to think that something is working against boys.
All too often, and unfortunately, reverse-discrimination is viewed as a sort of “compensation for damages” for the benefit of earlier victims and thus gets tolerated, or even promoted. Constitutional requirements get the blind eye.
No shift.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_sex_ratio
Germany still has a 1.05 ratio at birth and a total ratio of all age groups of 0.97. Perfectly normal.
But it should be pointed out that GDP is mostly produced by males, as it has always been. Find those societies that are matriarchal. How do they compare economically? This is just another example of the push back to the dark ages. The accompanying Gore Effect alone will force a period of climate cooling.
(TIC)
Here I’m not referring to birthrates. I’m referring to the ratio of boys and girls in advanced secondary school (those who are bound for universities and higher degrees).
I have this idea that they might impress a few very feeble-minded kids with their BS… and nobody else.
More evidence, if we needed it, that all generalizations are false…
The ideology continues to flog anything traditional. Arguments/debates are suppressed.
Here in the US, the President’s newly formed lobbying group, Organizing for Action (OFA), is it making it official: “Obama Supporters Target ‘Climate Deniers,’ As Science Challenges Obama on Global Warming.”
(See: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-supporters-target-climate-deniers-science-challenges-obama-global-warming )
Got it? Anyone who dares to challenge the Administration’s position that “Climate Change” is real, accepted, and beyond debate will now—OFFICIALLY— become a “Climate Change Denier.”
What next?
What next? Eugenics!
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Bioethics/message/8651
which, together with the fact that MEN are global warming, leads me to this famous film quote…
“Well, that would not be necessary Mr. President. It could easily be accomplished with a computer. And a computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross section of necessary skills. Of course it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition. Naturally, they would breed prodigiously, eh? There would be much time, and little to do. But ah with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, I would guess that they could then work their way back to the present gross national product within say, twenty years.”
For a while I thought you were quoting Schäuble. 🙂
I’ve skimmed the original text and concluded that the article identifies women as being more gullible. Back in my day at school, I used to score top marks in comprehension.
The “physicist” identified in the text is the former Managing Director of the Climate Alliance and has her own web page. It seems that she’s been pseudo-scienceing in semi-government and activist groups for quarter of a century. Make up your own mind about her gender politics.
This is an example of what comes out of “higher education” nowadays. Indoctrination … read the Professor’s approving comment below the article, nicely shepherding the “scientists” into the right way of thinking.
Oi! The idiots give it away!
“We can liken the development of climate models to natural selection. Successful models and their components thrive, while less effective ones eventually drop off and become extinct.”
Yes I thought so…
(How does this square with their and Gavin Schmidt’s claim that GCM’s are representations of physical laws? Rethorical question.)
Thank you for the article.
Can I take portions of it and publish it on A Voice for Men?
I will report it this Friday on the Voice of Europe radio show as well.
Best regards,
Lucian Vâlsan
European News Director, AVFM.
I have no objections
But does it take into consideration that women live about 10 years longer than men and so use an additional 14% of the earth’s resources during that time.
So perhaps women are the problem and not men ?
Good point. And old people tend to go on lots of cruises, which produce enormous sums of CO2. Besides, lots of the CO2 that men emit is for making the lives of women better. So how about a little gratitude!
Pierre – here in New Zealand, some of the stats that I remember:
– 59% of university students graduating are female
– 65% of post-graduate students are female
– 94% of primary school teachers are female
All the best.
I’d like to see more of a breakdown of those numbers.
For example: Do we have some proven failures, ie, a number of boys with a high IQ who dropped out?
Has the number of girls risen? If so — why?
It could well be that whilst the IQ distribution has been stable, many advanced skills no longer require top ability and talent to master, due to improved work methods and better tools.
So, it maybe not really a bad situation — if you train 100 gifted kids each year and suddenly you also train an extra 200 mediocre children to achieve the maximum they can, that’s great. But if you exclude people and limit places, then that’s an issue(and waste of talent and resources).
With the propaganda — well, usually it doesn’t work, and if it does, it won’t work for very long. Kids tend to quickly find out the truth and have a pesky habit of thinking for themselves (especially if they are smart) and so far, no government campaign to ‘educate’ young people has been a great sucess neither, in fact, teenagers rarely agree with adults on most things… 😉
If anything, the kind of critical thought that arises in smart children upon hearing adults spout rubbish is exactly the kind of questioning those people would like to prevent with their lies and brainwashing.
In essence, I think that this generation, just like every other generation will make it’s elders whinge about tempora and mores — kids have a habit of turning out exactly the opposite of what parents are striving for… 😀
“For example: Do we have some proven failures, ie, a number of boys with a high IQ who dropped out? ”
Evelyn. The IQ distribution of boys vds girls is VASTLY different.
The reason for this is that genes responsible for intelligence reside mostly on the X chromosome, of which women have two, men only one.
When you have two chromosomes each cell of your body will deactivate one of them. Which one is driven by chance.
So what does this result in?
The performance of the 2 chromosomes in women evens out – resulting in only 1 % of the women being idiots; and only 1 % being geniuses.
Opposed to that, in the male population, 15% are idiots, 15% are geniuses.
This explains the globally male-dominated prison population as well as the male-dominated Nobel prize winners.
Our schools are designed so that they can easily be passed with an IQ of 100.
As 15% of the male population won’t pass this test, overall, less males make it through.
Earlier, when there were schools with a higher standard, only the geniuses would pass those; leading to a total domination by males on that elite level.
You can see this today in every EE course. There are next to no females there.
Young people are not stupid. Teachers and others that supply false information will suffer the inglourious future of having all (that’s – all) their teaching questioned.
The “no need for males” theme entered the literature (fantasy) many years ago. And as my first two lines suggest, I can’t cite any author or title.
Since the truth is that CO2 is good for the environment, enabling all plants to grow faster, healthier, stronger, bigger, richer, more fruitfully (see http://www.co2science.org) – and has caused world plant growth to increase by 10% over the past 30 years – we men should get the credit!
Dr Goebbels’ heirs appear alive and kicking with their AGW Gleichschaltung practices (and not only in Germany). Definitions, illustrations athttp://t.co/vZKx895Hty , and a comment. Apart from that, nobody has demonstrated a ‘climate model’ yet, viz http://cleanenergypundit.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/snippets-questions-2-climate-models.html.
In Australia, adult Asian and African refugees and migrants get their brains washed with left/green propaganda coincidentally (?!) supplied for “reading comprehension”.
As if the
indoctrination to social dependencyabundant advertising of generous social security offerings weren’t enough.In the future; the newmen™ won’t want washing machines, clothes dryers, dishwashers, vacuum cleaners, modern detergents, daytime TV, steam irons, hair dryers, hot baths, 87 pairs of shoes, lawnmowers, pesticides, chocolate, scented candles with essence of orangutan, shiny decorations made from metals and rare rocks, … nor care at all about their personal well being because women are (paraphrasing Alber; or is that Albern?) accustomed to thinking for others.
Here is the website of Frau Gotelind Alber (yeah it’s a female name; didn’t know that either. And sounds a lot like Alberich, the sourcerer dwarf from Parzival; “Siehe, Hier Wird Zeit Zu Raum”.[Wagner])
http://www.gotelind-alber.eu/
Here in New Zealand the Labour Party which is not in government is proposing to have some parliamentary seats only contested by women in the next election in order to even up the ‘gender’ balance in Parliament.
So male candidates of equal or more ability will not be allowed to stand.
Yay for hippydom!
Nietzsche must be turning in his grave. It couldn’t happen to a more warlike people… Now if we can only get the Russians, Chinese, and the world’s Arab and Muslim countries on board…
Nietzsche said “Everything the state says is a lie, and everything he has he has stolen”.
I’m not sure you’ve read or understood Nietzsche; and I don’t know where you stand. Maybe you’re a socialist, I can’t tell.
[…] Here […]
[…] https://notrickszone.com/2013/07/23/indoctrination-at-schools-in-germany-reaches-new-level-children-t… […]