There Has Been No ‘Global’ Warming In The Southern Hemisphere, Equatorial Regions

Half The Planet Has Not Cooperated

With The ‘Global’ Warming Narrative


According to overseers of the long-term instrumental temperature data, the Southern Hemisphere record is “mostly made up”.  This is due to an extremely limited number of available measurements both historically and even presently from the south pole to the equatorial regions.

Below is an actual e-mail conversation between the Climate Research Unit’s Phil Jones and climate scientist Tom Wigley.  Phil Jones is the one who is largely responsible for making up the 1850-present temperature data for the Met Office in the UK (HadCRUT).



According to Peterson and Vose (1997), in 1901 the representation of maximum/minimum instrumental temperature stations in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) up through the equatorial regions (South Asia, North Africa, Central America) was negligible.  Only coastal Australia had substantial instrumental representation in the early 20th century.   The rest of the temperature data for the SH and equatorial regions needed to be made up to extend “global” instrumental temperature data back to 1850.

 

To measure the historical temperature record for the bottom half of the planet, then, scientists use proxy evidence from such sources as ice cores or alkenones to reconstruct past climates.  When they do that, a common theme emerges.  The proxy evidence used in temperature reconstructions suggests that there has been no significant changes in temperature from Antarctica to the regions near or just above the equator in the last few centuries.  In other words, half the globe has not been following along with the anthropogenic “global” warming narrative.

Listed below are about 3 dozen graphical reconstructions indicating no obvious warming trend during the last few hundred years of assumed anthropogenic influence on surface temperatures.


Delong et al., 2012


Ault et al., 2013

 


Wei et al., 2015


Rosenthal et al., 2017




Fischel et al., 2017


Shevenell et al., 2011


South America


de Jong et al., 2013


von Gunten et al., 2009


De Jong et al., 2016

“[T]he reconstruction…shows that recent warming (until AD 2009) is not exceptional in the context of the past century. For example, the periods around AD 1940 and from AD 1950–1955 were warmer. … [B]ased on tree ring analyses from the upper tree limit in northern Patagonia, Villalba et al. (2003) found that the period just before AD 1950 was substantially warmer than more recent decades.”


Silveira and Pezzi, 2014



Sepúlveda et al., 2009 


Shevenell et al., 2011


South Africa


Tyson et al., 2000

“The climate of the interior of South Africa was around 1°C cooler in Little Ice Age [AD 1300 to 1800] and may have been over 3°C higher than at present during the extremes of the medieval warm period [AD 1000 to 1300].”

“It was variable throughout the millennium, but considerably more so during the warming of the eleventh to thirteenth centuries.  The lowest temperature events recorded during the Little Ice Age in South Africa are coeval with the Maunder and Sporer Minima in solar irradiance.  The medieval warming is shown to have coincided with … the Medieval Maximum in solar radiation.”


Sánchez-Sesma, 2015


Zinke et al., 2014



Dupont et al., 2004


Weldeab et al, 2005


Australia, New Zealand


O’Donnell et al., 2016


Tyson et al., 2000


de Frietas et al., 2015

 


South Asia


Sunkara and Tiwari, 2016


Yan et al., 2015


Fan et al., 2009 


Munz et al., 2015


Zinke et al., 2016


Thapa et al., 2015

[T]emperature in Central Asia and northern Hemisphere revert back towards cooling trends in the late twentieth century.”


Southern Ocean


Jones et al., 2016



Markle et al., 2017


Bostock et al., 2013


Foster et al., 2016


Antarctica


Stenni et al., 2017


Schneider et al., 2006


Miles et al., 2013


Mayewski et al., 2017


Turner et al., 2016


Fudge et al., 2016

39 responses to “There Has Been No ‘Global’ Warming In The Southern Hemisphere, Equatorial Regions”

  1. sunsettommy

    Warmists keep saying CO2 is a well mixed gas in the atmosphere, yet only the Northern Hemisphere has any warming in it.

    1. sod

      ” yet only the Northern Hemisphere has any warming in it.”

      the south has a lot of ocean…

      1. sunsettommy

        Sod,

        does that you mean it was never GLOBAL warming?

        How come CO2 effect which is an ATMOSPHERE effect, doesn’t work in the Southern Hemisphere?

        1. ewing caldwell

          It was Northern Hemisphere Warming. It’s never been Global Warming.

          It’s all because the Southern Hemisphere has Antarctica. The Northern Hemisphere doesn’t. There is little land between Antarctica and the rest of the Southern Hemisphere, just open ocean. So Antarctica is literally the weather factory.

      2. Rosco

        And CO2 transmits >90% of the wavelengths of IR emitted by ambient earth temperatures at close to 100% – it is basically irrelevant at the tiny concentrations present in the atmosphere.

        The NH suffers from UHI effect.

      3. Stosh

        Africa at 11,608,000 Sq. Miles (30,065,000 Sq. Km) is about 20% of the earth’s land mass, and historically has had about 2 weather stations…not substantially more today

    2. SebastianH

      Are they really saying this? Or are they not saying that it’s well mixed … i don’t know, let’s watch a youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1SgmFa0r04

      Kenneth, so there is some small cooling from 1940 until 1970 in the northern hemisphere: http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4nh/mean:36/plot/hadcrut4sh/mean:36/plot/hadcrut4nh/from:1940/to:1970/trend

      Does the graph look like warming never happened? Is the seasonal cooling in the northern hemisphere also a sign of warming not happening? Every year it gets cold for some months, doesn’t it? 😉

      1. sunsettommy

        Seb,

        HadCrut like GISS has corrupted their data with adjustments.

        Here is what looked like BEFORE climate science fraud came along:

        https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Image-011.gif

        1. sunsettommy

          This one with 2017 GISS overaid the 1974 NCAR data:

          https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/PaintImage78.gif

      2. AndyG55

        In most un-tampered data, the 1940 period was much warmer than the 1970’s in the NH.

        Forced by the ocean currents, particularly the AMO

        DENY facts using massively tainted and maladjusted data, seb

        Its what you do. Lie and Farce, in every post you make.

        1. AndyG55

          Seb DENIES that data has been adjusted to favour the AGW scam, when the evidence is obvious and very blatant.

          He is most definitely a “Climate Change™” Denier.

      3. SebastianH

        Ah, the classic “but the data was adjusted” skeptics card has been played again. If the adjustments don’t fit in your narrative than claim they are fraud, right?

        1. P Gosselin

          No. The problem is that the adjustments were made in one direction only. Can you guess which one?

    3. AndyG55

      Gees Kenneth.. I’m going to need a bigger hard drive to save all these graphs and REAL DATA ! 🙂

  2. David Johnson

    Marvelous and very revealing data

  3. tom0mason

    Brazilian are upset because like last year winter has started early, except this year it’s even earlier.

    Ummm, just a bit more cool weather getting to the SH early again.
    https://www.climatempo.com.br/noticia/2017/04/28/abril-termina-com-geada-e-temperatura-abaixo-de-zero-no-br-2258

  4. tom0mason

    As I said on some blogs back in 2014 —
    Consider if the Arctic sea-ice extended south as much as the Antarctic sea-ice has gone north, then you would be able to walk (or preferably snowmobile or skidoo) on the ice from the East coast of Labrador (in Canada) to the west coast of North Scotland or South Norway.

    Since then very little has changed.

  5. Gabriel Lopes

    Most of the countries of SH had never had many trouble with extreme weather conditions except maybe for the hurricanes in South Pacific near Australia and NZ. Weather forecast was mostly due to agricultural interest. Tornadoes were not fully acquainted maybe till recently the movie film ‘Twister’ brought it to the people’s attention. So it’s very unlikely that temperatures would have been taken with scientific accuracy almost everywhere around the SH. And the personal experience of everyone says the weather remains quite the same thru the decades. That’s why the AGW has very little interest all around these countries and in fact it’s mostly confused with ‘pollution’ or ‘deforestation and fauna extinction’ for most of the population.

  6. Anders Valland

    I wonder why, in the two first figures of this post, there are no stations in Scandinavia?

  7. AndyG55
    1. SebastianH

      Don’t know if the link will work here:

      https://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=ltjib1m1uf3pf_&ctype=l&met_y=tpes_t1#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=tpes_t1&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=country_group&idim=country_group:oecd:non-oecd&idim=country:DEU:USA&ifdim=country_group&hl=de&dl=de&ind=false

      Also, the argument that it is ok to emit more CO2 if your economy grows is a little bit irritating. The absolute emissions increase the CO2 concentration. If the goal were to stabilize the CO2 output per GDP unit, we would still double the output every few decades …

      1. AndyG55

        It is ALWAYS ok to emit CO2.

        It is totally and absolutely BENEFICIAL to all life on this glorious CARBON BASED planet we are so fortunate to live on.

        It is absolutely MARVELOUS that CO2 levels will continue to climb, no matter what the AGW cretins try to do.

        Doesn’t it make you feel like you WASTING YOUR TIME, seb.

        We all know you are. 🙂

        Maybe time for you to WAKE UP TO REALITY!

    2. sod

      “A little something for seb-sob to read.

      Enjoy, AGW stooges.”

      again, you have nothing but insults. The wuwt article is simply wrong. Germany is exporting more electricity and it is moving out of nuclear power. It is a perfect example of lying with numbers.

      the main progress of “energiewende” was in electricity sector. Looking at total CO2 output is just a trick to confuse the uneducated. It is fake news at best!

      renewables:

      https://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=ltjib1m1uf3pf_&ctype=l&met_y=tpes_t1#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=rnewable_t1&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=country_group&idim=country_group:oecd:non-oecd&idim=country:DEU:USA&ifdim=country_group&hl=de&dl=de&ind=false

      and electricity production:

      https://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=ltjib1m1uf3pf_&ctype=l&met_y=tpes_t1#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=welecgen_t1&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=country_group&idim=country_group:oecd:non-oecd&idim=country:DEU:USA&ifdim=country_group&hl=de&dl=de&ind=false

      1. sod

        oh, and thanks for your nice introduction on wuwt. You are a troll and nothing else.

        ” AndyG55
        May 2, 2017 at 2:08 am

        I have directed two low-info twerps from NoTricks to come and argue against this.

        I doubt they will have the courage to appear.. but if they do, please treat them with the hilarity they deserve.

        1. sunsettommy

          AndyG55,doesn’t know you were banned there a long time ago.

          Snicker……

          Meanwhile why can’t you address it anyway, here?

        2. AndyG55

          “You are a troll and nothing else.”

          And why are you here EXCEPT as a low-level low-information AGW troll.

          GET REAL sob-sob, you don’t even know what YOU are.

      2. AndyG55

        The WUWT article is simply CORRECT..

        you have NOTHING, expect baby troll yapping, as usual

  8. If All You See… » Pirate's Cove

    […] blog of the day is NoTricksZone, with a post noting the absence of warming in the Southern […]

  9. Data Analyses Show Rapid Global Surface Cooling, Growing Arctic Ice Thickness

    […] just days ago, Kenneth Richards here showed that there hasn’t been any warming over the entire southern hemisphere at all. The warming of […]

  10. The history of Climate Change - Page 96 - Historum - History Forums

    […] There Has Been No ?Global? Warming In The Southern Hemisphere, Equatorial Regions According to overseers of the long-term instrumental temperature data, the Southern Hemisphere record is “mostly made up”. This is due to an extremely limited number of available measurements both historically and even presently from the south pole to the equatorial regions. Below is an actual e-mail conversation between the Climate Research Unit’s Phil Jones and climate scientist Tom Wigley. Phil Jones is the one who is largely responsible for making up the 1850-present temperature data for the Met Office in the UK (HadCRUT). so when it's asserted that something occured 1901 or previous to then, it's not based on any temperature readings, but attempts to figure it out by ice core or other proxies. […]

  11. CO2isLife

    Ceteris Paribus; Less is More, Use Only Data Sets That Don’t Require “Adjustments.”

    CO2 blankets the globe at 400 ppm, so as far as any cross-sectional multivariable model it is considered a constant. In other words, at any one period in time, CO2 can not explain regional differences in temperature. CO2 is 400 ppm at the N. Pole, S. Pole, and the Equator. You can’t explain a variation with a constant, especially one that traps outgoing, not incoming radiation.
    https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/04/09/ceteris-paribus-less-is-more-use-only-data-sets-that-dont-require-adjustments/

  12. There Has Been No ‘Global’ Warming In The Southern Hemisphere, Equatorial Regions | Un hobby...

    […] Kenneth Richard, May 4, […]

  13. CO2 Can’t Cause the Warming Alarmists Claim it Does – CO2 is Life

    […] The oceans are rather uniform emitters of radiation, whereas the land isn’t. As man has turned fields into cities, forests into farmland, rivers into lakes, and dirt into asphalt roads, man has altered the heat absorption of the land. He has no similar impact on the oceans. Therefore, to identify the CO2 “signature” we should focus on the Southern Hemisphere, instead of the corrupted Northern Hemisphere. The above chart does just that, and demonstrates that the Southern Hemisphere has much lower temperature volatility, did not surpass the previous peak set in 1998, and has increased 0.2 Degree C less than the Northern Hemisphere since records began in 1979. Both Hemispheres, however, show that they closely track the changes in the ocean temperatures. Once again, CO2 is 405 ppm, so CO2 can’t be the cause of the temperature differential between the two hemispheres. Clearly, there is warming that is not due to CO2. This observation is also supported by other research as well. […]

  14. CO2isLife

    CO2 Can’t Cause the Warming Alarmists Claim it Does

    In conclusion, if you break the data down to isolate the impact of CO2 on atmospheric temperatures, there simply isn’t a strong case to be made that CO2 is the cause of the warming. Yes the oceans are warming, yes temperatures have been warming, but that doesn’t mean CO2 is the cause of that warming. If you isolate the impact of CO2 by removing the impact of the oceans, the urban heat island effect, and atmospheric water vapor, the result is that those areas show no warming what so ever. CO2 increased from 335 ppm to 405 ppm in Antarctica, and it had no impact at all, none, nada, zip.

    https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/05/10/co2-cant-cause-the-warming-alarmists-claim-it-does/

    1. SebastianH

      “How increasing CO2 leads to an increased negative greenhouse effect in Antarctica”: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015GL066749/full

      Nice try …

      1. AndyG55

        So, extra cooling in the poles, and absolutely no warming anywhere else (as you have well proven)

        Are you now becoming a GLOBAL COOLING ALARMIST ????

        Or do you just have too many feet in your mouth at the moment !