Scientists Now Assert Natural Mechanisms Have Driven The Recent Retreat Of The Greenland Ice Sheet

Scientists are increasingly concluding that changes in low level cloud cover, not CO2, are what govern the surface radiation budget in the polar regions, driving and determining the retreat of the ice sheets. 

Image Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate3363

It is considered “established science” that  “the greenhouse effect of clouds may be larger than that resulting from a hundredfold increase of the C02 concentration of the atmosphere” (Ramanathan et al., 1989, 1,647 citations to date).

Indeed, satellite observations indicate that the Earth’s “radiation budget changes are caused by changes in tropical mean cloudiness” (Wielicki et al., 2002), not CO2 concentration changes.

Consequently, scientists have increasingly concluded that the driving mechanism that has governed and determined the melt of the polar ice sheets during recent decades has been the natural decadal-scale changes in cloud cover.

Hofer et al., 2017

Decreasing cloud cover drives the recent

mass loss on the Greenland Ice Sheet

“The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) has been losing mass at an accelerating rate since the mid-1990s. … We show, using satellite data and climate model output, that the abrupt reduction in surface mass balance since about 1995 can be attributed largely to a coincident trend of decreasing summer cloud cover enhancing the melt-albedo feedback. Satellite observations show that, from 1995 to 2009, summer cloud cover decreased by 0.9 ± 0.3% per year. Model output indicates that the GrIS summer melt increases by 27 ± 13 gigatons (Gt) per percent reduction in summer cloud cover, principally because of the impact of increased shortwave radiation over the low albedo ablation zone. The observed reduction in cloud cover is strongly correlated with a state shift in the North Atlantic Oscillation promoting anticyclonic conditions in summer and suggests that the enhanced surface mass loss from the GrIS is driven by synoptic-scale changes in Arctic-wide atmospheric circulation. … Th[e] strong correlation between summertime NAO index and the MAR-based cloud cover could be used to forecast whether the observed reduction in cloud cover during summer, and the associated increase in GrIS melt, is likely to continue.”

“[Our results] also indicate that the sudden decline in Greenland’s (surface) mass balance is not primarily a direct response to the local increase in atmospheric temperature, because anomalies in downwelling longwave radiation have contributed less energy to the increase in melt of the GrIS than SWD [summertime shortwave forcing] anomalies. This is contradictory to previous analyses that have focused on the increase in temperature as the main cause of GrIS melting (15, 16), as well as on the longwave warming effect of clouds (10). Climate warming is instead altering large-scale circulation patterns.”

Wu et al., 2018

The radiative effect of clouds has attracted increasing attention; for example, it was found that decreasing cloud cover drives the recent loss of mass from the Greenland ice sheet by enhancing the melt-albedo feedback (Hofer et al., 2017). Thus, enhanced albedo effect from increasing cloud cover in southwest China during the early Holocene could have caused a reduction in summer temperature. …  From 1960 to 2005, total cloud cover decreased over southwest China, including Yunnan Province (Zhang et al., 2011b) … [as] summer temperature increased [1961-2007] (Liu et al., 2010). This negative relationship between cloud cover and summer temperature was also found in India during the period 1931-2002 (Roy and Balling, 2005).”

Perovich, 2018

The surface radiation budget of the Arctic Ocean plays a central role in summer ice melt and is governed by clouds and surface albedo. … Longwave and shortwave radiation are primary drivers in the surface heat budget during summer melt (Persson et al., 2002). The surface radiative balance consists of contributions from incoming shortwave radiation, reflected shortwave radiation, incoming longwave radiation, and outgoing longwave radiation. Clouds have a major impact on both incoming longwave and shortwave radiative fluxes. … Future impacts on net radiative balances will depend on both ice and cloud conditions. As the sea ice cover evolves towards more first year ice, greater melt pond coverage, and more open water, the area-averaged albedo will be less than the break-even albedo for much of the summer. This implies less melting under cloudy conditions than sunny. However, the net radiative balance will still likely be less under sunny skies at the beginning of the melt season in May and early June.”

Nicolas et al., 2017

“During the short Antarctic summer, strong onshore winds may by themselves raise the ice sheet’s surface temperature (Ts) up to the melting point(through exchange of sensible heat), especially at low elevations. However, Ts [surface temperature] is ultimately controlled by the full surface energy budget (SEB), being the net of radiative (short- and longwave) and turbulent (sensible and latent) heat fluxes. Clouds exert an important influence on the SEB by modulating the radiative fluxes, primarily by enhancing downwelling longwave radiation and attenuating incoming solar radiation. In particular, low-level liquid-bearing clouds can have a determinant role in either causing or prolonging melting conditions over ice sheets.”

Scott et al., 2017   

Clouds are an essential parameter of the surface energy budget influencing the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) response to atmospheric warming and net contribution to global sea level rise.  … Owing to perennial high-albedo snow and ice cover, cloud infrared emission dominates over cloud solar reflection and absorption leading to a positive net all-wave cloud radiative effect (CRE) at the surface … The annual-mean CRE [cloud radiative effect] at the WAIS [West Antarctic Ice Sheet] surface is 34 W m−2, representing a significant cloud-induced warming of the ice sheet. … In summer, clouds warm the WAIS by 26 W m−2, on average, despite maximum offsetting shortwave CRE.”

26 responses to “Scientists Now Assert Natural Mechanisms Have Driven The Recent Retreat Of The Greenland Ice Sheet”

  1. Yonason

    And all that dark dirt on the ice surface (see photo above) has NOTHING to do with it.

    I wonder where that photo was taken, and where all those ice-melt ashes or whatever they are came from. See photo in this article for similar effect.
    http://farmingmama.blogspot.com/2011/02/reusing-ashes-from-our-woodstove.html

    It’ll work even with clouds, though not as well.

  2. Bitter&twisted

    More evidence to undermine the alarmist concept of “consensus” and “settled science”.
    P.S. DNCWTRT

  3. SebastianH

    Kenneth, you didn’t reply to my question about what is causing cloud cover to change. Is it still GCRs in your belief system or has that changed?

    Or could it be something like this?
    https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0734.1
    “Decreases in subtropical low cloud cover (LCC) occur in climate model simulations of global warming.”

    Or is that bad science because it’s model based? 😉

    Maybe this helps?
    https://isccp.giss.nasa.gov/role.html#ROLE
    “The trouble is that clouds are produced by the climate, specifically the atmospheric motions (winds) that are produced by the radiative and latent heating influenced by clouds. This connected loop of relations is called a feedback loop.”

    Also, to be fair, the last site is full of “we need much better observations” warnings. Apparently, the cloud feedback isn’t settled science and the question seems to be open whether they will dampen or amplify the temperature response to more GHGs. But your argument isn’t that of a feedback, it’s making cloud cover changes the cause. Completely contrarian to established science.

    By quoting this (Nicolas et al., 2017):

    Clouds exert an important influence on the SEB by modulating the radiative fluxes, primarily by enhancing downwelling longwave radiation and attenuating incoming solar radiation.

    Do you think that more clouds warm Antarctica by enhancing downwelling longwave radiation and less clouds that increase incoming solar radiation also warm Antarctica … so in any case the clouds just cause the warming? A decrease in the tropics warms, an increase at the poles warms … clouds always cause warming 😉

    And why is it now more frequent El Ninos in the 21st century that will cause major melt events? I thought it’s volcanoes according to spike55?

    1. spike55

      “you didn’t reply to my question”

      Seb, You haven’t EVER replied to those two simple questions with anything but mindless evasion and empty rhetoric

      WAITING..

      1. SebastianH

        What questions AndyG55? I only see a constant demonstration that you are not willing to accept reality. You expect others to do the homework for you and when somebody falls for it you ignore them putting work into explaining something to you that you won’t accept anyway. Troll on, my vile fan.

        1. spike55

          OMG now you are in DENIAL of the two simple questions that you continually run away from

          You really have reached the depths of PATHETIC CHILDISHNESS in your manic evasion strategies.

          Unable to support even the most basic farce of the AGW meme.. and you wonder why everyone considers you nothing but a serial pest and a TROLL.

          Q1. In what way has the climate changed in the last 40 years, that can be scientifically attributable to human CO2 ?

          Q2. Do you have ANY EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE at all that humans have changed the global climate in ANYWAY WHATSOEVER?

          You KNOW that you are INCAPABLE of answering these two questions with anything resemble REAL SCIENCE..

          .. because the evidence DOES NOT EXIST.

          .. hence your continued pointless headless-chook avoidance routines.

  4. Steven Fraser

    I wonder to what the authors would attribute last year’s ice mass gain?

    1. Bitter&twisted

      Santa Claus?
      No seriously, Global warming!

  5. spike55
  6. spike55

    A video forecast for the NH VERY COLD winter…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V9qM-lFMh8

  7. Skeeezoid Chronicles; Schooling the Climate Sophist Part Quatro – CO2 is Life

    […] (Source) […]

Leave a Reply

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy

Close