New Study: Sea Level Rise Doesn’t ‘Spell Doom’ – Little To No Loss Of Coastal Wetlands Projected By 2100

Another new false-alarm paper reveals that coastal wetlands may not only persist well into the 21st century despite present rates of sea level rise, but the coasts may expand and even prosper due to the natural ability for soil to “build up vertically by sediment accretion”.  

Headline/image source: Sciencenews.org

“Coasts are growing all over the world”

Two years ago, a ground-breaking paper was published in the journal Nature Climate Change indicating that the Earth’s shorelines have been growing overall since the mid-1980s (Donchyts et al., 2016).

In other words, because “coasts are growing all over the world”, there is more land area above sea level today than there was 30 years ago.

This conclusion has again been confirmed by a new paper (Luijendijk et al., 2018) that indicates only 24% of the world’s beach shorelines are eroding, whereas 76% of the world’s beach shorelines are either growing (28%) or stable (48%).

Supposedly “vulnerable” Pacific islands are expanding 

Hisabayashi et al., 2018 found that 15 of 28 studied atoll islands in the southwest Pacific grew in shoreline area during 2005 to 2015.

Kench et al., 2018 examined “101 islands in Tuvalu over the past four decades (1971–2014)”, a period in which local sea level has risen at twice the global average.  They found a “land area increase in eight of nine atolls.”

“Surprisingly, we show that all islands have changed and that the dominant mode of change has been island expansion, which has increased the land area of the nation. … Using remotely sensed data, change is analysed over the past four decades, a period when local sea level has risen at twice the global average [<2 mm/yr-1] (~3.90 ± 0.4 mm.yr−1). Results highlight a net increase in land area in Tuvalu of 73.5 ha (2.9%), despite sea-level rise, and land area increase in eight of nine atolls.” (Kench et al., 2018)

Coastal marsh area has been stable or expanding

Kirwan et al., 2016 reported that coastal marshes and their “vulnerable” ecosystems are not only persisting despite present-day sea level rise, coastal marsh area has generally been stable or expanding.

In fact, it was claimed that sea level rise rates of 10-50 mm/yr (1 to 5 meters per century) during the 21st century would not be substantial enough to submerge the globe’s coastal marshes.

“Coastal marshes are considered to be among the most valuable and vulnerable ecosystems on Earth, where the imminent loss of ecosystem services is a feared consequence of sea level rise. However, we show with a meta-analysis that global measurements of marsh elevation change indicate that marshes are generally building at rates similar to or exceeding historical sea level rise, and that process-based models predict survival under a wide range of future sea level scenarios. We argue that marsh vulnerability tends to be overstated because assessment methods often fail to consider biophysical feedback processes known to accelerate soil building with sea level rise, and the potential for marshes to migrate inland. … In summary, dynamic models of marsh vertical accretion indicate that marshes will generally survive relative SLR rates of 10–50 mm yr−1 during the twenty-first century, depending on tidal range and suspended sediment availability.” (Kirwan et al., 2016)

Coastal wetlands may not be threatened by sea level rise

Adding yet another layer to the strengthening conclusion that global sea levels aren’t rising fast enough to “spell doom” to “vulnerable” coastal ecosystems and communities, Schuerch et al. (2018) find that the natural ability of coastal wetlands to “build up vertically by sediment accretion” could potentially lead to “wetland gains of up to 60 per cent of the current area“.

More and more, scientists are undercutting alarmist proclamations of catastrophic 21st century sea level rise brought on by anthropogenic global warming.


Rising sea levels don’t have to spell doom for the world’s coastal wetlands. A new study suggests salt marshes and other wetlands could accumulate soil quickly enough to avoid becoming fully submerged — if humans are willing to give them a little elbow room. … The new study builds on previous work that suggests rising seas will increase sediment buildup in some parts of coastal wetlands. This increased sediment, as well as human adaptations to allow wetlands to move inland as the seas rise, could allow the coastal fringes to not only survive but to increase their global area by as much as 60 percent.” (Sciencenews press release for Schuerch et al., 2018)

On the basis of our simulations, we find that, globally, rather than losses, wetland gains of up to 60 per cent of the current area are possible, if more than 37 per cent (our upper estimate for current accommodation space) of coastal wetlands have sufficient accommodation space, and sediment supply remains at present levels.”
[M]ost large-scale assessments have overestimated the vulnerability of coastal wetlands to SLR [present-day sea level rise]. These differences highlight a major knowledge gap in our understanding of the responses of coastal wetland areas to global environmental change. It has been argued that the reason for the observed discrepancy is that large-scale assessments have so far failed to consider the well understood biophysical feedback mechanisms that are typically included in local-scale models. These mechanisms include the ability of coastal wetlands to build up vertically by sediment accretion, which is enhanced with increasing inundation heights and frequencies, triggered, for example, by accelerating SLR [present-day sea level rise], and which enables coastal wetlands to persist or even prosper with SLR [present-day sea level rise].”
[W]e project that until 2100, the loss of global coastal wetland area will range between 0 and 30 per cent, assuming no further accommodation space in addition to current levels. Our simulations suggest that the resilience of global wetlands is primarily driven by the availability of accommodation space, which is strongly influenced by the building of anthropogenic infrastructure in the coastal zone and such infrastructure is expected to change over the twenty-first century. Rather than being an inevitable consequence of global sea-level rise, our findings indicate that large-scale loss of coastal wetlands might be avoidable, if sufficient additional accommodation space can be created through careful nature-based adaptation solutions to coastal management.”
“[O]ur calibrated model, which includes mangroves as well as tidal salt and freshwater marshes, correctly predicts observations of present-day vertical wetland change, obtained from large meta-datasets from all over the world (Crosby et al., 2016; Kirwan et al., 2016; Lovelock et al., 2015), for 78% of all coastal areas where data are currently available (N=46).”
Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

32 responses to “New Study: Sea Level Rise Doesn’t ‘Spell Doom’ – Little To No Loss Of Coastal Wetlands Projected By 2100”

  1. Brian G Valentine

    Island nations such as Tuvalu will need to invent a new excuse for the West to send them “climate money” – which they actually use to buy Mercedes Benz Limousines, Palaces, and Weaponry

    1. Newminster

      They don’t need climate money. Aren’t they making big bucks out of the .tv domain suffix?

  2. Bitter&twisted

    Golly gosh. Another example of “settled science”.

    DNCWTRT 😬

  3. sasquatch

    Pacifica California: Icon of Coastal Erosion & Natural Climate Change

    The oceans have been rising ever since the end of the last ice age.

    When a new ice age arrives, humans won’t be blamed, they’ll seek refuge into warmer climes. There will be no choice. If you are too far north to make the trip, you’ll be an Eskimo. There will be nothing that you can do except accept the hard cold facts of the matter.

    A new ice age will dictate what happens with natural forces.

    A new Lake Missoula will form.

    Coastal wetlands will follow, the wetlands will subside at higher elevations and grow at new lower sea level areas.

    1. Hivemind

      Try reading Fallen Angels by Larry Niven, et al. It is very instructive on the mental attitude of the green blob.

    2. Denis Ables

      The oceans have been rising ever since the last ice age BEGAN to melt, not when it ended.

  4. Dee
  5. spike55

    A bit OT

    But it looks like Arctic sea ice extent via MASIE has bottomed out at around 4.6 Wadhams, just above the 12 year average. (Just under 13 Germanies.)

    NSIDC probably has a day or so to go, but will be around 4.5 Wadhams.

    DMI volume has definitely turned. Low volume was 6.213 Mkm³ against a 12 year average low of 5.872 Mkm³

    1. SebastianH

      It only takes 1 spike55 to ignore the “hot” pocket below the Arctic that scientists found. It also takes only 1 spike55 (that ought to be a unit now) to imagine the current extent to be above a 12 year average.

      http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/

      It’s about 1 million km² below the 2001-2010 average and not one year after 2010 was above that average … so what are you talking about, unit man?

      1. spike55

        Current level is above 2007, 2011, 2012, 2015, 2016 for this day seb.

        NOTHING UNUSUAL IS HAPPENING at all, just the NORMAL AMO cycle.

        Seb STILL DENIES the FACT that Arctic sea levels are FAR higher than most of the last 10,000 years.

        And that the late 1970s was the HIGHEST EXTENT since the climb out of the LIA.

        Why are you such a CLIMATE CHANGE DENIER, seb ???

        No more Arctic death spiral.. Poor little seb.

        I suppose you mean the hot pocket from volcanic activity seb, there is certainly NO KNOWN MECHANISM for it to be caused by anything human.

        I suppose you could FANTASIES, if you wanted to, but whatever you came up with would be IRRELEVANT, just like the rest of your cackling.

      2. Newminster

        We might be interested in your 10-year average in another context, Seb, but since spike55 was talking about a 12-year average we don’t really care what you think.
        Was his DMI figure right or wrong? If wrong, prove it. If right, shut up.

    2. spike55

      Seb, my statement is 100% correct.

      You are unable to provide evidence to counter any of the FACTS posted.

      You know that.. so GROW UP, and stop your juvenile trolling attempts.

      No “ice-free” Arctic this year, little troll.

      No passage through the Larsen route (1944) this year or any year since 1944 as far as I can find.

      One HECK OF A LOT OF SEA ICE up there, Far more than for some90% of the current interglacial. !

      Wouldn’t you agree, seb..

      .. or would you DENY the facts, yet again.

  6. SebastianH

    In other words, because “coasts are growing all over the world”, there is more land area above sea level today than there was 30 years ago.

    Great article … “The largest increase in water has been on the Tibetan Plateau, while the Aral Sea has been the biggest conversion of water to land.”

    That’s really something the sea level rise or sediment accretion did, right?

    Coastal wetlands may not be threatened by sea level rise

    Who lives in coastal wetlands?

    And to make Yonason happy, I provide a link to Google Scholar where readers interested in science can find papers about economic effects sea level rise has:
    https://scholar.google.de/scholar?q=economic+effect+sea+level+rise

    That’s more science than the 7 comments before mine managed to contribute to this discussion. Happy?

    1. spike55

      Sorry seb, a link to a SEARCH on costs of sea level rise is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT since sea level rise is constant, and coastal areas are actually expanding.

      You have FAILED MAGNAMINOUSLY, yet again !!

      1. SebastianH

        Sea level rise is not constant, I prefer pointing people to tools to make up their own mind instead of cherry picked papers that I imagine support my view of the world and coastal areas expanding (where?) doesn’t really mean that an increasing sea level will not be a problem for lots of places.

        If you had left out the last sentence and refrained from capitalizing words your comment would have been almost a normal reply even though it does only disinform. Keep trying!

        1. spike55

          Sea level rise has actually been decelerating over the last while years.

          https://i.postimg.cc/cJ2kcp03/Sea_leve_slowsPuls_2.jpg

          Again, you have ABSOLUTELY ZERO SCIENCE to back up anything you say, just mindless cackling.

          There is absolutely ZERO EVIDENCE of human caused sea level rise.

          You continue to FAIL, UTTERLY and COMPLETELY.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy

Close