Phytoplankton Are Not Starving (Correction)

Ed Caryl likes to research, and a short time ago wrote an essay about phytoplankton, see here. Some readers pointed out a flaw, and so Ed has insisted on posting a correction – as is appropriate in science. Happens to the best of us. (We’re not Penn State or CRU here).

The Phytoplankton are not Starving
By Ed Caryl

In a comment to the original article, The Phytoplankton are Starving, R. de Hann made the following comment:

 So I have big trouble accepting the loss of plankton for fact.

In regard to the claim of over-fishing and fishing methods (by other reports), which is a serious problem in several places, we see the gap of lost volume filled up with other species very quickly.

We know for example that tuna eat jellyfish and in those waters where the tuna numbers have been reduced the numbers of jellyfish have exploded, compensating for the “loss of mass”.

So one species is quickly replaced by another.

Willis Eschenbach made this comment:

Humans catch and remove about 70 million tonnes of mostly big fish from the ocean annually. But the amount of mass at each trophic level reduces by about 90%. Tuna are four trophic levels up from phytoplankton. This means that for every kilo (pound) of fish that we eat, there are about 10,000 kilos (pounds) of phytoplankton that are supporting that fish.

That means that we are removing something on the order of one ten-thousandth (0.01%) of the nutrients that the phytoplankton that fed those tuna depend on …

However, that’s not all. Much of the phytoplankton goes to feed things that are generally not eaten by humans. As a result, the reduction in phytoplankton nutrients is even smaller than 0.01%. Much of it is never seen by humans in any form.

As a result, your hypothesis (reduction in plankton results from human usage of the required nutrients) fails by a number of orders of magnitude. We simply don’t remove enough nutrients to make a difference.

These comments forced me to re-think my position. I went back to the literature.

The total autotrophic biomass production in the oceans is about 48 billion tons carbon per year. We are currently harvesting about 80 million tons of fish and shellfish per year. The harvest has averaged over 70 million tons per year for the last 30 years, and over 40 million tons per year for the 30 years before that. Over the last 60 years we have harvested about 3.5 billion tons. The total biomass production in the ocean is circulating production. The fish we pull out removes that mass from circulation. So the reduction in phytoplankton nutrients is in fact small. Willis is correct; this doesn’t explain the 40% reduction in phytoplankton. As Willis correctly states, the food web in the oceans has several trophic levels, each about 10% of the level below it.

So thanks to R. de Hann and Willis Eschenbach for their comments.

4 responses to “Phytoplankton Are Not Starving (Correction)”

  1. DirkH

    O/T Pierre, Look here:
    Vattenfall plans test of sequestering CO2 in old mine in Eastern Germany. Locals are protesting.

  2. R. de Haan

    Thanks for the compliments.
    As I have stated before, it’s time for common sense to return and take on those who serve political agenda’s aimed to undermine our wonderful civilization.

    We are screwed with our own tax money and it has to stop immediately:

    The New Colonialits

  3. R. de Haan

    I appreciate Ed Car Caryl’s posts.
    We are all in a learning process and hopefully this will never stop.

    If we stop learning, we stop living.

    No politics here, just science and common sense.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy