Modest Or No Warming Western US Stations Altered By NASA, Now Show Stronger Warming

Today we look at the mean annual temperatures of western USA stations that have a Brightness Index (BI) of 0, meaning they are not subjected to urban heat island impacts.

Many people are claiming that temperatures worldwide are rising due to greenhouse gas emissions from human activities.

First we begin with the station located at the town of Fort Bragg in California. Using NASA data, we plot the annual temperatures going back to 1935!

Data source: NASA GISS

Above we plot the V4 unadjusted versus the V4 adjusted data. Neither show any warming since 1935. The adjusted data, however, turns a cooling trend into one of no cooling.

Recently I tweeted an animation that compares the v4 unadjusted data to the V4 adjusted data for the Beowawe station in the state of Nevada:

Note how the Beowawe data of the past was substantially altered (reduced) in order to create a warming trend from a previously cooling trend. Here the warming is man made – but statistically by researchers at NASA.

The story is similar for 4 other stations located in the western US.

At the Manti station in Utah, modest warming was adjusted to created more warming:

Data source: NASA GISS

The same is true for the Seligman, Arizona station:

Data source: NASA GISS

The mean annual temperatures measured by the Cheesman, Colorado station used to show a cooling trend since 1903, before NASA tampered with the data and changed them into a warming trend: 

Data source: NASA GISS.

Finally we look at the data from the station for Hachita, New Mexico:

Data source: NASA GISS.

Here for Hachita, NASA changed the data so that modest warming was changed to produce greater warming.

Why do the new, adjusted data plots always end up warmer and never cooler? This seems to be Deep State science, and not real science which the public expects to get and is owed.




11 responses to “Modest Or No Warming Western US Stations Altered By NASA, Now Show Stronger Warming”

  1. TimoSoren

    The manti comment is wrong based on the graph.
    Unadusted has a higher trendline slope (faster warming)
    and a higher trendline endpoint (final adjusted tempurature warmer).

    It is not an example of every area has the same result.
    Perhaps they do that just to argue, they aren’t politcal?

  2. Modest Or No Warming Western US Stations Altered By NASA, Now Show Stronger Warming — NoTricksZone | Climate- Science.press

    […] über Modest Or No Warming Western US Stations Altered By NASA, Now Show Stronger Warming — NoTricksZone […]

  3. TONY

    FYI FT BRAGG IN NORTH CAROLINA ??/

  4. Aussie

    Keep flagging this. With the new solar minimum underway eventually they will simply be unable to adjust things and it will be very clear that the trend is cooling.

  5. Brooks Hurd

    ありがと, Kirye,

    You are providing more examples of how NASA has been adjusting stations which have long term flat or decreasing trends so that they match UHI impacted stations which have an increasing rate. Much of the western US is very sparsely populated, thus it makes no sense to adjust rural stations which are representative of 95%+ of the western part of continent so that they can match <5% of area that is UHI impacted.

    I live in a rural part of California, thus I am not guessing about the population density.

  6. Mervyn

    We’ve known for many years the temperature data was being manipulated (always favouring a greater warming trend) thanks to individuals like John Coleman on KUSI News:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHbMzBpmmyA

  7. Tom Anderson

    TONY: There are two Fort Braggs, both named after the Confederate Civil War General Braxteon Bragg. At the outbreak of the war Bragg was stationed on the Mendocino County, CA, Coast where present Fort Braggs. The story is that his command was so impressed by him that they named their post after him.

    Indeed, Bragg was an exemplary military commander whose punctilious military bearing was so legendary that one story has him disobeying his own command because it violated military protocol. The Fort Bragg in North Carolina was named after he achieved distinction in the war.

    P.S. It is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. 2071 for the custodian of official U.S. records to manipulate or otherwise alter the data in his charge. The penalty is up to 3 years in prison or $250,000, making it a felony.

  8. Tom Anderson

    Correction: Braxton Bragg.

  9. pochas94

    I won’t be happy with NASA until they recover the original unadjusted data.

  10. Modest Or No Warming Western US Stations Altered By NASA, Now Show Stronger Warming — | Climate- Science.press

    […] https://notrickszone.com/2020/05/13/modest-or-no-warming-western-us-stations-altered-by-nasa-now-sho&#8230; Modest Or No Warming Western US Stations Altered By NASA, Now Show Stronger Warming NoTricksZone: Not here to worship what i… / by P Gosselin / 6d By Kirye (photo) and Pierre Gosselin Today we look at the mean annual temperatures of western USA stations that have a Brightness Index (BI) of 0, meaning… […]

  11. scott

    I do not understand why NASA needs to adjust the modern temperature records.
    If there was a “time of observation” bias in older data, I may accept that adjustment. What I don’t accept is the modern adjustment in the data (ok outside their wanting more warming) how do they justify that? Were the people in 2000 or 2010 to stupid to read their digital thermometers, did their computers misread the numbers or what?

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy

Close