Germany’s enviro-nannies may be getting even loonier. Not only is CO2 a threat to humanity, they claim, but so is wood-heating and the fine particulates that get emitted.
Germany looking at woodstove-operating license for users. Image: P. Gosselin
According to Blackout News here, woodstove owners may soon need to get a “stove operating license” – in order “to learn how to use their fireplace properly.”
Granted what’s planned is not a new regulation, but will be a “voluntary training course” offered by local authorities – at least for the time being. But most of us know where this eventually leads: to more bureaucratic harassment.
According to Blackout News, the aim of a stove operating license is primarily to teach stove owners “how to operate their stoves more efficiently and in a more environmentally friendly way” and to “reduce emissions, especially particulate matter”.
Strict regulations already in place
German wood-burning stoves are already subject to among the toughest standards in the world, where today only clean-efficiently burning units are allowed. Professional chimney sweepers regularly check stoves, chimneys and stove pipes to make sure only proper firewood is being burned and that the stove is up-to-date. Violators risk fines and having their stove shut down.
Moreover, firewood must be properly dried before burning in an approved proper woodstove. Moreover, citizens wishing to cut their own firewood must either do it by hand, or complete a chainsaw operating safety course, and don regulated protective gear like chainsaw-protective pants & workshoes, faceshield, hearing protection and helmet.
The up-front costs of a stove, chimney, installation, and equipment can easily run over 10,000 euros before burning your first log. Absolutely forget jerry-rigging your own system using an old drum on a cinder block with a stove pipe going through the wall!
Voluntary training for the time being
For now, as already mentioned, the stove operating license in a voluntary measure and no one is forced to take part in the training courses. However, Blackout News warns: “This voluntary nature is met with skepticism by some: Is there a subliminal pressure being built up here that chimney owners feel obliged to take part in such training in order to be on the ‘safe side’ socially?”
Others criticize that the measure is completely unnecessary as most stove owners already know how to operate their stove safely and have years of experience doing so.
Blackout News comments further: “While it is positive that the training courses are offered free of charge, the question arises as to whether all stove owners really need this help. Many local authorities want to reduce particulate emissions through education and at the same time increase safety in households. However, it remains to be seen whether the voluntary stove license will actually have the desired effect or whether it is just another symbol of excessive regulation.”
“Free of charge” means MORE COSTLY for society;-(
My backyard chiminea is not used for space heating, but for warming my toes when I am outside. And I burn “found wood,” tree limbs that have fallen and debris from renovation projects that are constantly in progress in the city. I think my uses would not pass muster in Germany.
In Oxford the local (labour) council is banning most woodburners from 1 Dec. They are obviously working in cahoots with the (labour) government to “reduce the surplus population”. (The first thing the new (labour) government did was to abolish the winter fuel allowance for pensioners)
[…] From NoTrickZone […]
Not one iota devoted to the central allegation…is there any measurable, detectible, verifiable, reproducible, and irrefutable, evidence that the “fine particulates” emitted in any German wood burning stove have any measurable, detectible, verifiable, reproducible, and irrefutable, significant negative bearing on the health of German citizens?
In a word–no.
Steve Milloy has done yeoman’s service in debunking the ever-expanding mythological harms surrounding 2.5 micron particulate matter.
https://junkscience.com/2023/03/pm2-5-mass-killer-or-mass-fraud/
IMHO, the “go-to” issue:
https://junkscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Sugar-punchline.png
For a mental image of what this means, a nonsmoker will inhale approximately two sugar packets worth of PM2.5 over the course of his 80-year life expectancy. A limited smoker, on the other hand, will inhale about a 4-pound bag of sugar’s worth of PM2.5. But both the nonsmoker and the limited smoker will have the same life expectancy of 80 years! If PM2.5 is a killer, as per EPA, how can that possibly be?
https://junkscience.com/2023/03/epa-and-pm2-5-no-science-no-bodies-just-fraud/