In a new interview, a former senior Pfizer toxicologist describes the Comirnaty vaccine as a shoddily tested medicine, rushed out with no regard to safety, and administered to billions worldwide…
The former Pfizer Europe toxicologist confirms that the standard safety protocols for a medical product intended for the general population were bypassed or ignored.
Also read here: Toxicologist Dr. Helmut Sterz Tells Bundestag Hearing Vaccine Should Have Never Been Approved
In the following Sven Böttcher Youtube video (German), Dr. Helmut Sterz, a toxicologist with 35 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry (including at Pfizer), makes several shocking claims regarding the development and safety of the Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine.
The list of safety failures is long and potentially tragic on a massive scale:
1. Failure to Conduct Essential Safety Studies
Dr. Sterz claims that the pre-clinical (animal) testing phase was “completely incomplete” and that the manufacturer skipped studies that are legally and ethically required for vaccines not targeting life-threatening diseases like Ebola:
Genotoxicity and mutagenicity
In the interview, Dr. Sterz asserts that no mutagenicity studies were ever conducted to check for changes to genes or chromosomes. He emphasizes that these tests are typically required even before Phase 1 human trials to protect volunteers. This stepped was skipped. [05:31].
Carcinogenicity
He notes that no 3-year carcinogenicity studies (to check for cancer risks) were performed. While he acknowledges the time pressure, he argues that alternative short-term tests should have been done instead. [05:01].
I can also state—and it’s not just a claim, it’s a finding—that carcinogenicity studies were not carried out. I can understand that a carcinogenicity study in rats takes three years, and they didn’t have that time. But they could have conducted alternative trials instead. The simplest and shortest would have been a series of mutagenicity studies… to get the first indications of whether such a risk exists.” [00:04:51]
Reproductive toxicity
In rat studies, Dr. Sterz points to signs of increased abortion rates that he claims were “brushed aside”. [42:04]
2. The “Human Experiment” and Control Group Destruction
Next, Sterz describes the mass vaccination campaign as a “large human experiment” and criticizes the handling of clinical data:
Elimination of the control group
He highlights that Pfizer allowed the placebo group to be vaccinated shortly after authorization. This effectively “neutralized” the control group, making it impossible to distinguish long-term vaccine side effects from other conditions. [20:42]
Inadequate monitoring
He also notes that the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) was overwhelmed by the volume of reported side effects and suggests that internal experts may have been pressured to remain silent about the rising numbers. [25:49]
The safety [of the vaccine]—there were already signals just a few months after the authorization. The side effects increased to such an extent that the individual pharmacovigilance centers—the PEI—couldn’t even keep up with registering them. And it should have been obvious to the employees of the Paul Ehrlich Institute that something was running differently here than with normal vaccinations.” [00:25:07]
3. Inherent Risks of the mRNA Technology
Moreover, Dr. Sterz argues that the specific technology used in the mass-produced vaccine is “inherently dangerous”:
Process change (DNA contamination)
He claims that while the initial clinical material was “clean,” the production process was changed for mass manufacturing to save costs. This involved using bacteria (E. coli) to produce the mRNA, which he claims leads to bacterial DNA fragments being packaged into the lipid nanoparticles and injected into humans. [58:38]
Cellular damage
He warns that if this foreign DNA enters a human cell nucleus during cell division, it can cause “massive devastation”. [59:43]
The lipid nanoparticles take up the bacterial DNA in exactly the same way, and thus the DNA is injected into the person. And that can lead to massive devastation in the cell nucleus when the cell divides and this bacterial DNA enters the cell nucleus. People should be told that this technology is to blame for these risks arising.” [00:59:24]
4. Specific Health Risks and “Turbo Cancer”
He discusses several severe health outcomes he associates with the vaccine:
Myocarditis and permanent scarring
He mentions that even “mild” cases of myocarditis in young people result in permanent heart muscle scarring, which can lead to sudden death during physical exertion. [46:18]
Turbo cancer
He suggests there is evidence of a rapid increase in aggressive cancers and the recurrence of previously stable cancers, which he attributes to the vaccine’s impact on the immune system’s ability to suppress tumor cells. [30:00], [52:09]
The observations of really good people are frightening: patients who had survived a cancer suddenly have a relapse. Such things were not observed before.” [00:52:09]
Impact on fertility
He claims that reported menstrual cycle disturbances and a significant drop in birth rates across Europe (averaging 17%) are signals of an impact on fertility that was not properly investigated. [41:34], [50:49]
On the influence on fertility—one could have guessed that without even being a specialist. There were already indications in the study on pregnant rats that it led to an increased rate of abortions. That was simply brushed aside… They said, ‘Well, we’ve seen that in control groups before,’ even though it wasn’t seen in this specific control group.” [00:41:57]”
Dr. Sterz concludes by stating that the rapid approval was a “massive oversight” (or “shambles”) and warns against the continued use of this specific mRNA platform for other vaccines in the pipeline.
I have a close friend who is in his 70’s who gets vaccinated regularly. When he got his last Covid Vaccine 18 months ago (which also contained a 2nd flu vaccine) he became very ill. His immune system and his nervous system shut down putting him in the hospital for 3 months. He is at home now but still has great difficulty walking.
I don’t know which of the vaccines is responsible for his adverse reaction but the FDA seems to have taken the position that there are no risks until proven otherwise, making us all guinea pigs.