The cracks in the facade of the global climate science are getting wider, more glaring as a significant group of experts chooses to break rank.
Modern Galileos are increasingly challenging the alarmist IPCC climate dogma. (Illustrative image generated by Grok AI).
According to a recent report by the German online TKP, a movement is gaining momentum within the scientific community that threatens to dismantle the official IPCC narrative from the inside out. This rebellion is led by 46 scientists, many of whom have direct experience working with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, who are now publicly challenging the foundational claims that have dictated global policy for decades.
The heart of their argument lies in the fundamental failure of current climate models.
These prestigious researchers – among them Dr. Robert Balling, Dr. Lucka Bogataj, Dr. John Christy and Dr. Judith Curry – contend that the IPCC has relied on simulations that are heavily biased toward human-induced CO2 while systematically ignoring or downplaying natural variables. By prioritizing political consensus over raw data, these models have consistently overestimated global warming, creating a gap between alarmist predictions and the actual temperature trends observed over the last several years.
The scientists suggest that the “climate emergency” is less a scientific reality and more an ideological construct designed to drive the Net Zero agenda.
Power natural factors ignorerd by IPCC
Furthermore, this group highlights the critical role of natural drivers that are often missing from the mainstream conversation. They point to solar activity, atmospheric water vapor, and complex cloud cycles as the true drivers of Earth’s climate. By looking back at historical periods like the Medieval Warm Period, they argue that the planet’s current warming is well within the bounds of natural variability and is not the unprecedented catastrophe it is often portrayed to be.
Culture of scientific suppression
Perhaps most concerning is the article’s depiction of a scientific community under pressure. The rebelling scientists describe a culture of suppression where dissenting opinions are sidelined through the loss of funding, career gatekeeping, and media blackouts. This internal collapse suggests that the “science is settled” mantra is no longer sustainable.
Dogmna coming to an end
As these 46 voices come forward, they signal a shift toward a more skeptical, data-driven approach that prioritizes objective reality over the prevailing political narrative, suggesting that the era of unquestioned climate dogma may be coming to an end.
This will also interest. RCP8.5 is retired!
https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/rcp85-is-officially-dead
From the link.
Big news: The new framework has eliminated the most extreme scenarios that have dominated climate research over much of the past several decades — specifically, RCP8.5, SSP5-8.5, and SSP3-7.0. This is an absolutely huge development in climate science which will have lasting impacts across research and policy.
Why now? What took so long?
All the nonsense in the Gulf has gingered everyone up; in the cold light of dawn all those windmills and solar panels are a poor substitute for the real power generation required for the next money-making opportunity – AI.
Thousands of scientists contribute to the IPCC, with hundreds serving as lead authors and thousands more as reviewers for each assessment report.
Dr. Robert Balling, Dr. John Christy and Dr. Judith Curry are not members of the IPCC
climate models from the 1970s when programmed with actual CO2 growth did predict 0.2° C warming per decade and that is exactly what happened with the surface temperatures. conservatives have lied about that fact since 2013
bubble warming since 1975 was caused by a CO2 emissions reduction in air pollution and a reduction in percentage of cloudiness
the models placed too much blame on CO2
the only evidence of natural warming is to assume that the change in cloudiness is a natural climate forcing but many scientists think it is a climate feedback
global warming not “bubble warming”
A bit late no?
They are spraying chemicals in our skies, killing insects, wild life, plants (bees, silk worms, trees, crops) and every form of life on earth. They pretend it is to block the sun to cool down the planet. It’s not true, they spray barium, aluminum and other extremely toxic substances, it has nothing to do with ‘climate’.
https://geoengineeringwatch.org/the-dimming-full-length-climate-engineering-documentary/
https://chemtrailsexposed.com/
Verry good Content For Reading , thanks for sharing with us
[…] No Tricks Zone: 46 IPCC Scientists Break Rank, Publicly Challenge Long-Standing Dogmatic Climate Claims […]
[…] Image: 46 IPCC Scientists Break Rank, Publicly Challenge Long-Standing Dogmatic Climate Claims […]
The Medieval Warm Period was highly localized happening only in psrys of northern North America and northern Europe. Most of the planet did not warm
A close reading will disclose only some of the 46 were actually IPCC connected scientists.
This year about 650 scientists will be presenting at IPCC
[…] *** 46 IPCC Scientists Break Rank, Publicly Challenge Long-Standing Dogmatic Climate Claims […]
[…] Global Warming — The Science:*** 46 IPCC Scientists Break Rank, Publicly Challenge Long-Standing Dogmatic Climate Claims*** Another Climate Activist Trojan Horse Gets […]