In the German video titled “Klima-Hysterie wissenschaftlich widerlegt?” (Climate Hysteria Scientifically Refuted?), Dr. Bernd Fleischmann presents a critical view of current climate policies and the scientific consensus on climate change.
Overuse of already refuted climate models
Firstly, Fleischmann questions the reliability of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and the IPCC, accusing them of using “alarmist models” to influence political decisions, such as the German Federal Constitutional Court’s climate ruling [01:40].
Positive climate findings get buried
On the subject of “tipping points”, Dr. Fleischmann argues that the concept is statistically and historically refuted. He claims that original tipping points, like the greening of the Sahara (which he views as positive), were removed from updates because they weren’t “alarmist enough” [03:53].
Moreover, Fleichmann asserts that climate models are based on “ignorance,” citing the wide range of temperature predictions (1–6°C) as proof that scientists do not actually know the impact of CO2 [05:30].
CO2 is an overall benefit
On the subject of CO2, Fleischmann argues that CO2 has a marginal effect on temperature (maximum 1°C increase if doubled) and is primarily beneficial for plant growth, leading to a “greening” of the planet, especially in the Sahel zone [05:51], [25:15].
Change mainly driven by more powerful, natural factors
Fleischmann attributes recent warming not to greenhouse gases, but to changes in absorbed solar radiation (less reflection) and natural oceanic cycles like El Niño [09:58]. He points out that historical temperature data (from 1850) is unreliable because there were almost no measurement stations in the Southern Hemisphere or Africa at that time, making high-precision global temperature claims “propaganda” [19:02].
Wind farms causing far more damage than benefit
Fleischmann further argues that wind farms actually cause local warming and soil drying by disrupting air layers and preventing the ground from cooling at night [31:02]. He explains how infrasound from wind turbines can make people ill by affecting “piezo channels” in human cells and the brain [34:55]. He also claims they kill thousands of tons of insects and numerous birds/bats annually [40:43].
Mass wealth redistribution scheme
Citing PIK Director Ottmar Edenhofer, Fleischmann shows that climate policy is actually a tool for the redistribution of global wealth from the middle class to the “super-rich” [36:46], [39:02].
Concertning the media, he accuses them (ARD, ZDF, Süddeutsche Zeitung) of spreading lies and failing to report scientific facts that contradict the climate narrative [21:07], [27:46].
“No climate crisis”
In summary, Fleischmann concludes that there is no “climate crisis,” warming is generally better for humanity than cooling (citing fewer deaths from heat than cold), and the “energy transition” is a scientific and economic mistake [40:19].
Solar farms also create their own warming when the panels get hot, while taking good farmland out of food production.
Mission accomplished: After Germany ruined its industry, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has retracted its key doomsday predictions
For years, “RCP8.5” was the central apocalyptic horror scenario of climate ideology. Extreme global warming and, as a result, a whole catalog of disasters—such as droughts, crop failures, floods, famines, wars, millions upon millions of “climate refugees,” and so on—were predicted as inevitable if the world did not bow to the climate sect’s insane demands. Governments—especially German ones, of course—the entire mainstream media, and even the Federal Constitutional Court made this nonsense the basis of their policies, reporting, and jurisprudence.
But now the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) has simply removed this very scenario from its collection of climate projections and replaced it with milder, more realistic assumptions. RCP8.5 is “implausible,” 44 climate researchers from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have now concluded.
The model had assumed fossil fuel emissions that were far too high, particularly from coal use. To meet those projections, more than one coal-fired power plant would have to be built every day, coal combustion would have to increase fivefold, and annual CO2 emissions would have to double. In reality, global CO2 emissions have been stagnating at around 40 billion tons per year for the past ten years. All indicators suggest that the RCP8.5 scenario was wildly exaggerated and will not even come close to being realized. Criticism of it emerged as early as 2014. Climate scientist Justin Ritchie noted that it assumed a coal boom for which there was not even the slightest sign at the time. Ritchie spoke of “systematic errors.” Of course, he was ignored. The international climate frenzy gained full momentum; as late as 2022, then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson allowed himself to be talked into accepting the fundamentally flawed model. “Adapt or die,” the British Environment Agency now proclaimed.
Immeasurable damage has been done
The damage caused by this utterly grotesque prediction is immeasurable. The 1.5-degree target of the Paris Climate Agreement, which is the Holy Grail of the climate cult; the EU’s disastrous “Green Deal,” which is destroying the European economy with ever-new absurd measures intended to reduce CO2 emissions; the goal of wanting—or rather, having to—be “climate-neutral” by 2050; this and other such madness was based largely on the RCP8.5 model, which has now been quietly buried. The entire climate craze is based on such more or less outrageous projections, which rely on countless parameters and simplistic assumptions that are far too imprecise for long-term forecasts. They are fundamentally unsuitable for accurately identifying long-term trends because there are far too many uncertainties. But none of this bothered the gigantic climate industry. The few profiteers of this far-fetched hysteria have raked in billions, if not trillions, while entire economies—especially in Germany, where this idiocy was, of course, carried out with particularly fanatical zeal—have been destroyed.
Here, too, they simply continue to base their assumptions on the RCP8.5 scenario. In March, Bärbel Bas’s Ministry of Labor commissioned the Prognos Institute to prepare a report on climate-related risks to the labor market, which concluded that RCP8.5 “most accurately reflects current climate trends.” So here, too, Germany will continue down the path to its own ruin with full determination. They even aim to be “climate-neutral” as early as 2045. By then, the country will look much like it did in 1945.
https://archive.is/hAN6j
Oh, only one grey cell, remained alive in her head, is eventually screaming!
🙂