It is claimed Earth’s surface has warmed by 1°C in the last 140 years – which is a supposedly rapid climate change. But a new study suggests the Northern Hemisphere surface naturally cooled by 1°C in 8 or 9 years, then warmed up again by 1°C within decades during the Late Antique Little Ice Age.
Scientists have determined there were “catastrophic volcanic eruptions that took place in 536, 540 and 547 A.D.” Sulphate aerosols consequently scattered the Sun’s radiance, dramatically cooling the Earth’s surface for decades. This global cooling period, referred to as the Late Antique Little Ice Age (LALIA), resulted in crop failures, famines, disease epidemics, and societal unrest. After the cooling event, Earth’s climate naturally returned to its previous warmth.
Using proxy records from 20 Northern Hemisphere (NH) locations, Peregrine, 2020 specifies that it cooled by about 1°C in less than a decade in the 530s and 540s A.D. By the 570s, however, the NH climate had warmed back up again (by 1°C).
These rapid climate changes easily exceed the pace of modern temperature changes (about 1°C total warming since 1880) assumed to be of anthropogenic origin.
Image Source: Peregrine, 2020
Extensive volcanism is also said to explain the Little Ice Age (LIA) centennial-scale global cooling (McGregor et al., 2015).
Image Source: McGregor et al., 2015
Modern warmth can thus be interpreted as a return to the climate “normal” – much like the abrupt return to pre-LALIA temperatures after that global cooling period ended.
Since the return to “normal” temperature after the LALIA cooling was necessarily a natural warming, the 1900s-to-present warming could also be interpreted as a natural event. After all, this is the null hypothesis – and at no time has it been falsified using real-world scientific evidence.
If we look at temperatures coming out of the Ice Ages we see extremely rapid warming taking place.
Its a nonsense for alarmists to claim that temperatures are heating up at the “fastest ever” rates.
I would note that alarmists never consider satellite measurements, or raw temperature data when they make the above assertions. They always rely on the tampered data graphs from NASA or other compromised organisations – ie. their conclusions are false as they are based on false or manipulated data
Keep in mind that when you encounter the use of “ever,” you have to request what amounts to the same thing that goes on in patent litigation – claim construction. How is “ever” defined? Based on what? How far back does it go?
Funny how often “ever” only goes back 30 or so years, to when some measurement technique was first deployed.
It’s pretty clear that when the last Ice Age ended, it did so with extremely rapid warming that has not been seen since then. But that’s read out of being “ever” for tactical reasons.
very interesting article. thanks