Pacific Ocean Tide Gauges Of 100+ Years: ‘Both The Relative Rate Of Rise And Acceleration Are Negative’

Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

As the sea levels have been oscillating, but not accelerating, in the long-term-trend tide gauges of Japan since the start of the 20th century, the same as all the other long-term-trend tide gauges of the world, it is increasingly unacceptable to base coastal management on alarmist predictions that are not supported by measurements.” – Parker, 2019

Image Source: Parker, 2019

I. A Pacific Ocean-induced sea level rise catastrophe by 2100?

The Pacific Ocean encompasses more than half of the Earth’s water volume.

Consequently, measured relative sea level trends in Pacific Ocean have important implications in analyzing the climate-modeled projections of future sea level rise.

Anywhere from about an additional meter (IPCC, 2013) to multiple meters (Garner et al., 2017; University of Hawaii, 2018) of sea level rise by 2100 is assumed in climate modeling due primarily to the exponential rise in anthropogenic CO2 emissions since the late 19th century.

To achieve these catastrophic sea level rise amplitudes, however, both the rate of increase and overall acceleration will need to be elevated dramatically – by more than an order of magnitude – from that which has been observed in the last century.

“Our analyses do not indicate acceleration in sea level in U.S. tide gauge records during the 20th century. Instead, for each time period we consider, the records show small decelerations that are consistent with a number of earlier studies of worldwide-gauge records. The decelerations that we obtain are opposite in sign and one to two orders of magnitude less than the +0.07 to + 0.28mm/yr accelerations that are required to reach sea levels predicted for 2100 by Vermeer and Rahmsdorf (2009), Jevrejeva, Moore, and Grinsted (2010), and Grinsted, Moore, and Jevrejeva (2010). Bindoff et al. (2007) note an increase in worldwide temperature from1906 to 2005 of 0.74 C.  It is essential that investigations continue to address why this worldwide-temperature increase has not produced acceleration of global sea level over the past 100 years, and indeed why global sea level has possibly decelerated for at least the last 80 years.”  (Houston and Dean, 2011)

II. Due to natural variability, relative sea level changes may only be gauged with long-term records

Pacific tide gauges sited in the same location for a century or longer (with consistent rates of subsidence or uplift) can qualitatively assess the overall rate or acceleration of sea level changes.

Shorter-term (less than 80 years) measurements may easily compromise the accurate computation of rate or acceleration trends due especially to the prominence of 60-year cycles of natural origin (Chambers et al., 2012).

Separating an alleged anthropogenically-forced sea level rise trend from natural variability has been a well-documented problem that has been intensively debated in the scientific literature.

• “Global sea levels have been rising through the past century and are projected to rise at an accelerated rate throughout the 21st century. This has motivated a number of authors to search for already existing accelerations in observations, which would be, if present, vital for coastal protection planning purposes. No scientific consensus has been reached yet as to how a possible acceleration could be separated from intrinsic climate variability in sea level records. This has led to an intensive debate on its existence and, if absent, also on the general validity of current future projections.” (Visser et al., 2015)
• Previous research has shown that sea-level acceleration determined from individual tide gauge records has remarkably large scatter as record lengths decrease due to decadal variations in sea level. We extend previous data sets to the present time and find even greater acceleration scatter. Using analytic solutions, sinusoidal oscillations with amplitudes and periods of typical decadal variations are shown to basically account for the relationship between record length and both acceleration and trend difference. Data show that decadal variations will obscure estimates of underlying accelerations if record lengths of individual gauges are not greater than at least 75 years. Although worldwide data are less affected by decadal variations than individual gauge data, decadal variations still significantly affect estimates of underlying accelerations, in particular for record lengths less than about 60 years. We give two examples of recent studies that use record lengths of about 30 to 60 years to determine acceleration or related trend difference. Previous authors dismissed the importance of decadal variations on their results and, as a result, reached invalid conclusions.”  (Houston and Dean, 2013)
• “A proper coastal management requires an accurate estimation of sea level trends locally and globally. It is claimed that the sea levels are rising following an exponential growth since the 1990s, and because of that coastal communities are facing huge challenges. Many local governments throughout Australia, including those on the coast, have responded to the various warnings about changes in climate and increases in sea levels by undertaking detailed climate change risk management exercises. … It is shown here that the exponential growth claim is not supported by any measurement of enough length and quality when properly analysed. The tide gauge results do not support the exponential growth theory. The projections by the relevant state bodies should therefore be revised by considering the measurements and not the models to compute the future sea level rises for the next 30 years following the same trend experienced over the last 30 years.” (Parker et al., 2013)

III. Long-term negative Pacific Ocean sea level rise rates and acceleration belie a human influence

It has already been suggested that an anthropogenic fingerprint has yet to be detected in Pacific Ocean measurements of sea level change due to the overriding presence of natural variability.

• “Sea level rates up to three times the global mean rate are being observed in the western tropical Pacific since 1993 by satellite altimetry. From recently published studies, it is not yet clear whether the sea level spatial trend patterns of the Pacific Ocean observed by satellite altimetry are mostly due to internal climate variability or if some anthropogenic fingerprint is already detectable. We show that subtraction of the IPO contribution to sea level trends through the method of linear regression does not totally remove the internal variability, leaving significant signal related to the non-linear response of sea level to El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO). In addition, by making use of 21 CMIP5 coupled climate models, we study the contribution of external forcing to the Pacific Ocean regional sea level variability over 1993–2013, and show that according to climate models, externally forced and thereby the anthropogenic sea level fingerprint on regional sea level trends in the tropical Pacific is still too small to be observable by satellite altimetry.”  (Palanisamy et al., 2015)
• “The tropical Pacific has featured some remarkable trends during the recent decades such as an unprecedented strengthening of the Trade Winds, a strong cooling of sea surface temperatures (SST) in the eastern and central part, thereby slowing global warming and strengthening the zonal SST gradient, and highly asymmetric sea level trends with an accelerated rise relative to the global average in the western and a drop in the eastern part. These trends have been linked to an anomalously strong Pacific Walker Circulation, the major zonal atmospheric overturning cell in the tropical Pacific sector, but the origin of the strengthening is controversial. Here we address the question as to whether the recent decadal trends in the tropical Pacific atmosphere-ocean system are within the range of internal variability, as simulated in long unforced integrations of global climate models. We show that the recent trends are still within the range of long-term internal decadal variability.” (Hadi Bordbar et al., 2016)

Further supporting the conclusion that an anthropogenic fingerprint has not yet been detected in sea level data, a compilation of records from 30 long-term Pacific Ocean tide gauges has been made available in a new paper (Parker, 2019) published in the journal Ocean and Coastal Management.

The averaged measurements from these 30 tide gauge instruments reveal a negative trend in both the rate of sea level rise (-0.02 mm/yr) and acceleration (-0.00007 mm/yr2) since the early 20th century.

Observations of negative sea level trends for the Earth’s largest ocean basin while CO2 concentrations rose from about 300 ppm (1900 C.E.) to well over 400 ppm obviously do not support the narrative that says anthropogenic CO2 emissions are a driver of relative sea level changes.

Climate model-based projections of meters of sea level rise by 2100 promulgated by proponents of human-induced climate alarm may therefore be categorized as both speculative and dubious.


Parker, 2019

Sea level oscillations in Japan and China

since the start of the 20th century

“Japan has strong quasi-20 and quasi-60 years low frequencies sea level fluctuations. These periodicities translate in specific length requirements of tide gauge records. 1894/1906 to present, there is no sea level acceleration in the 5 long-term stations. Those not affected by crustal movement (4 of 5) do not even show a rising trend. … In Japan tide gauges are abundant, recording the sea levels since the end of the 19th century. Here I analyze the long-term tide gauges of Japan: the tide gauges of Oshoro, Wajima, Hosojima and Tonoura, that are affected to a lesser extent by crustal movement, and of Aburatsubo, which is more affected by crustal movement. Hosojima has an acceleration 1894 to 2018 of +0.0016 mm/yr2. Wajima has an acceleration 1894 to 2018 of +0.0046 mm/yr2. Oshoro has an acceleration 1906 to 2018 of −0.0058 mm/yr2. Tonoura has an acceleration 1894 to 1984 of −0.0446 mm/yr2. Aburatsubo, has an acceleration 1894 to 2018 of −0.0066 mm/yr2. There is no sign of any sea level acceleration around Japan since the start of the 20th century. The different tide gauges show low frequency (>10 years) oscillations of periodicity quasi-20 and quasi-60 years. The latter periodicity is the strongest in four cases out of five.”
As the sea levels have been oscillating, but not accelerating, in the long-term-trend tide gauges of Japan since the start of the 20th century, the same as all the other long-term-trend tide gauges of the world, it is increasingly unacceptable to base coastal management on alarmist predictions that are not supported by measurements.”
“Recently the Japan Meteorological Agency (2018) reported an analysis of the measured sea levels around Japan in the stations less affected by crustal movement. It showed substantial stability of sea level since the early 20th century.”
The Japan Meteorological Agency (2018) has shown that the relative rise in sea level on the coast of Japan has stabilized since the beginning of the 20th century and has not accelerated. The analysis presented here has further strengthened this result. We have also shown that the only accelerating record, the one of Hamada, is an artifact ofcoupling of the long-term tide gauge record of Tonoura, discontinued in 1984, with the short, recent tide gauge record of Hamada II, established in 1984. This latter result is consistent with the findings of Okunaka and Hirahara (2016). They verified by correcting by GPS data the tide gauge results at 3 stations, that a sea level rise of Japan was estimated largely due to the subsidence at Hamada.”
“At least 60 years of data collected by the same location without any perturbing event are needed to compute a reasonably accurate sea level rate of rise by linear fitting, and almost double that length, at least more than 100 years, are needed to compute a reasonably accurate sea level acceleration by parabolic fitting. In Japan, with its short time window, it may be wrongly concluded that the sea levels have been accelerating since the 1980s. By considering the data since 1906, as done by Japan Meteorological Agency (2018), or by considering the data since 1894 for Hosojima, Wajima, Aburatsubo and Tonoura, and since 1906 for Oshoro as done here, the sea levels are perfectly stable.”
“The relative sea level rise measured by a tide gauge has a sea and a land component. The relative sea level may rise, or fall, not only because the volume of the water is increasing, or reducing. It may also rise, or fall, because the tide gauge instrument is sinking, or uplifting. The sea component has important multi-decadal periodicities of quasi 60 years. Hence, not less than 60 years of data are needed to infer a rate of rise, and many more years, not less than 100 years, are needed to infer an acceleration. … Only where the land component is characterized by a stable pattern of subsidence or uplift, an absolute sea level rise can be computed. In Japan, only few areas are relatively stable, with the rest affected by crustal movements strongly variable in time and space.”
“The East coast of Asia has the five long-term tide gauges, Oshoro, Wajima, Hosojima and Tonoura affected to a lesser extent by crustal movement, and Aburatsubo, that is affected by crustal movement, all in Japan. Without Aburatsubo, “Japan-4” data set, the average relative rate of rise is +0.08 mm/yr, and the average acceleration is negative, −0.01105 mm/yr2. With Aburatsubo, “Japan-5” data set, the average relative rate of rise is +0.79 mm/yr, and the average acceleration is still negative, −0.01016 mm/yr2.”
“Oceania has similarly five long-term tide gauges, Fremantle, that is however in the Indian Ocean, and Sydney in Australia, Auckland and Dunedin in New Zealand, and Honolulu, in the Hawaii Islands. With Fremantle, ‘Oceania-5’ data set, the average relative rate of rise is +1.306 mm/yr, and the average acceleration is +0.00490 mm/yr2. Without Fremantle, the average relative rate of rise is +1.209 mm/yr, and the average acceleration is +0.00469 mm/yr2.”
“Along the West Coast of North America, by also accepting tide gauge records with more than 80 years of data to properly cover all the Pacific coast from Alaska to Panama, in the 20 long term stations of Ketchikan, AK, USA; Sitka, AK, USA; Juneau, AK, USA; Unalaska, AK, USA; Prince Rupert, Canada; Point Atkinson, Canada; Vancouver, Canada; Victoria, Canada; Tofino, Canada; Friday Harbor, WA, USA; Seattle, WA, USA; Neah Bay, WA, USA; Astoria, OR, USA; Crescent City, CA, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA; Santa Monica, CA, USA; Los Angeles, CA, USA; La Jolla, CA, USA; San Diego, CA, USA, and Balboa, Panama, the average rate of rise is −0.47 mm/yr, and the average acceleration is +0.0015 mm/yr2, ‘West Coast of North America-20’ data set.”
“The Pacific Ocean covers about 46% of Earth’s water surface, and more than 50% of the Earth’s water volume. Thinking even more global[ly], even larger data sets also including segmented records, do not show accelerations larger than a few micrometers per year squared (Parker and Ollier, 2017a, b). By considering the average of the tide gauges included in the Japan5, Oceania-4 and West Coast of North America-20 data sets, both the relative rate of rise and the acceleration are negative, −0.02139 mm/yr and −0.00007 mm/yr2 respectively. These values compare very badly with the models’ projections and speculations adopted for coastal management such as
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) models’ projections of 850 mm by 2100 require an acceleration of +0.1268 mm/yr2 to come true.
• the speculation by Garner et al. (2017) of 2650 mm by 2100 that requires an even larger acceleration of +0.5556 mm/yr2 to come true. This is 5 times more than the already exaggerated IPCC values.
• the speculation by University of Hawaii (2018) of 3 feet, or914.4 mm, by 2050 that requires an even larger acceleration of +1.525 mm/yr2 to come true. This is 15 times more than the already exaggerated IPCC values.
The measured values of sea level rate of rise and acceleration are much smaller than the models’ predictions and the speculations.”

Image Source: Parker, 2019
Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

23 responses to “Pacific Ocean Tide Gauges Of 100+ Years: ‘Both The Relative Rate Of Rise And Acceleration Are Negative’”

  1. Ron Clutz

    The huge gap between climate models predictions and observed sea levels at tidal gauges is exemplified by a comparison at San Francisco

    https://rclutz.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/sf-ca-past-projected.png

    Other examples are here: https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2018/06/21/uscs-warnings-of-coastal-floodings/

    1. tom0mason

      Thank-you Ron a most impressive blog post at your site (yes Science Matters).

      Of course there are some that frequent this site that insist the warm atmosphere can heat-up the oceans, and that the poles are loosing ice at an unprecedented rate. But as he is just another (and probably paid) cAGW advocate no one rational takes him or his nasty and irrelevant comments very seriously.

  2. Sapaud

    “… it is increasingly unacceptable to base coastal management on alarmist predictions that are not supported by measurements…”

    Indeed: During the last ice age the sea levels were 400 feet below what we have today.

    But are they doing? “Coastlines Under Attack: Storm Surges Artificially Created” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJ1ja1MBhpc

    The past: “Shocking! Governments Are Preparing For A Mini Ice Age!” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ0nQR9m3OI&t=15m50s

    “In 1997 there was a project called GRIP (Greenland Ice Core Project) where they drilled deep cores into the ice in central Greenland. They went down as much as two miles deep and pulled the cores up so that they could look at ice that had formed as much as two hundred and fifty thousand years ago, and they determined that every Ice Age in the last quarter million years, every single Ice Age began in less than 20 years, beginning in less than twenty years. It went from temperatures and climate as warm as today into full-fledged glacial severity in less than twenty years.”
    – Robert Felix

    Our next future:

    “Ice Age Near” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krJ0dx9eIk8
    “❄ We MUST PREPARE! John L Casey Presentation 2012 Global Cooling ☀” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhYjlLFRwyo

    The climate sect makes it even worse: “David Keith’s Sun Dimming Experiment SCoPEx Possibly Coming Spring 2019 – ALL THE FACTS” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx-KYNy9_5o

    And yet a carbon tax?

    “Starting next spring, it’ll no longer be free to pollute in Canada” und ” Canada passed a carbon tax that will give most Canadians more money – By rebating the revenue to households, disposable income rises, which can be a boon for the Canadian economy” – https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/oct/26/canada-passed-a-carbon-tax-that-will-give-most-canadians-more-money also discussed in this video: “Northern Hemisphere is Not Warming (781)” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yExR2VTAaOg
    Notice: CO2 = pollution

    The climate tax will surely be a boon.

    “Coldest Montreal Snowstorm for a Century and the Mainstream Media’s Embarrassing “Explain-Away”” – https://electroverse.net/coldest-montreal-snowstorm-for-a-century-and-the-mainstream-medias-embarrassing-explain-away/
    ““Life-Threatening” -50F to Impact 200 Million in the US this Week” – https://electroverse.net/life-threatening-50f-to-impact-200-million-in-the-us-this-week/

    “Grand Solar Minimum News with Lee Wheelbarger interviewing Charles Scott” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HasMPE_uhm4

    “Professor Valentina Zharkova Confirms “Super” Grand Solar Minimum [Edited}” – https://nextgrandminimum.com/2018/11/22/professor-valentina-zharkova-breaks-her-silence-and-confirms-super-grand-solar-minimum/

    “Ice Age Now” – https://www.iceagenow.info/
    “New Ice Age Ahead” – http://ice-age-ahead-iaa.ca/
    “Adapt 2030” – https://www.youtube.com/user/MyanmarLiving/videos
    “Ice Age Farmer” – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCI-Am0t4qQaP_Do9FwMWw3Q/videos

    1. Yonason

      Well, that should keep me busy for a while. Thanks, Sapaud

  3. Gus

    Just by looking briefly at the paper, I notice that the author does not calculate standard deviations, neither for the rate, nor for the acceleration. Just looking at the data scatter in his graphs, I reckon, the errors would make the actual numbers overlap with zero.

  4. SebastianH

    it is increasingly unacceptable to base coastal management on alarmist predictions that are not supported by measurements

    Language like this should be unacceptable in any scientifc publication. What kind of review did this go through?

    Pacific trends and especially Japanese trends are positive btw:
    https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/

    Some trends from Japan:
    https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=642-061
    https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=642-091
    https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=642-141

    They seem to be higher than the global average …

    And yes, there are stations that show oscillation and even a negative trend:
    https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=645-011

    Did the author only look at those to make his unaccaptable point?

  5. Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #346 | Watts Up With That?
  6. Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #346 - Sciencetells

Leave a Reply

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy

Close