Dire News About COVID 19 Vax Emerging...Far Worse Than Imagined

Dire News About COVID 19 Vax Emerging…Far Worse Than Imagined

Share this...

Unusually aggressive cancers in children and people in their 20s and s 30s…possible damaged immune system cancer surveillance… 

Truly, I’m really glad I stood my ground and resisted getting sucked into taking what we today know was a risky, untested, slipshod experimental medicine.

Definitely worth watching

The following High Wire video interview hosted by Del Bigtree has oncologist and cancer researcher, Dr William Makis as a and where he sounds the alarm on the sudden rise in “turbo cancers”, where a wave of incredibly fast growing cancers allegedly is currently spreading among COVID vaccinated individuals.

Image cropped here.

Then problem appears to stem from the spike protein, which your cells are instructed to produce by the mRNA vaccine. It seems that no one knows how long these toxic spikes remain in your body and that it is in some cases profoundly disrupting the body’s natural immune system, with fatal consequences.

Since the rollout, young people are dying “suddenly and unexpectedly”, some of heart failure and others of “turbo cancer”. And every booster seems to be making it worse.

Please watch the entire video and share it. Let’s end the pandemic of vaccine adverse effects denial.


 

Share this...

New Study: ‘Atmospheric CO2 Is Not The Cause Of Climate Change’ … The Next Glaciation Has Begun

Share this...

CO2 “only affects a small range of long-wave re-radiation from the surface of the Earth,” and there “seems to be no connection between carbon dioxide and the temperature of the Earth.” − Harris, 2023

New research published in the MDPI journal atmosphere by Dr. Stuart A. Harris asserts past and modern climate changes are natural and not driven by variations in atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

Some key points from the paper include:

• Past and modern climate change is driven by solar cycle (Milankovitch) variations and their affect on ocean circulation and heat transport.

• Throughout the last hundreds of thousands of years, temperature changes precede the lagging changes in CO2.

• The UN IPCC position that atmospheric CO2 is the cause of the warming since the onset of the Industrial Revolution is only an assumption that is “not consistent with studies involving changes in temperature in rural areas of the northern [NH] hemisphere.”

• The natural 23 thousand year (23 ka) Milankovitch cycle has begun to reduce insolation in the NH “starting in 2020,” and this “heralds the start of the next glaciation.”

• CO2 is essential for life on Earth (photosynthesis), and a reduction in CO2 would be harmful to the biosphere. On the other hand, there “seems to be no connection between carbon dioxide and the temperature of the Earth.”

Image Source: Harris, 2023
Share this...

Swiss Cardiologist’s Request: “Entire mRNA ‘Vaccine’ Platform Must Be Banned”

Share this...

The long sinister shadow of the mRNA induced spike protein

Dr. Thomas Binder wrote a letter to the editor of the Swiss Medical Journal in the response to an interview of Prof Christoph Berger and President of the Federal Commission for Vaccination Issues #EKIF, explaining why the entire mRNA ‘vaccine’ platform must be banned.

Dr. Thomas Binder. Image cropped here

Firstly, Binder writes, “The effective dose of the expressed foreign protein is unknown and varies greatly between individuals, mRNA ‘vaccines’ should never have been approved.”

Secondly, “The cells that express the protein foreign to the body and then present it on their surface are falsely recognized by the immune system as being foreign or infected by an alien, thus are destroyed in an autoimmune attack similar to transplant rejection.”

He continues: “If it was only expressed by skeletal muscle cells capable of regeneration, this would not be problematic. But the LNPs [lipid nanoparticles] are chosen in such a way that they introduce the mRNA into any body cell, including those of the heart, brain, embryo and fetus. Worse: As physiological doses did not induce a relevant immune response, a horrendous dose of mRNA was chosen, which can lead to the destruction not only of a few, but of so many cells that this can cause serious illness and death. Worse: The chosen antigen and LNPs are themselves toxic.”

He notes: “Kevin McKernan found contamination with up to a third of functional bacterial plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process, which explains the spike expression over years detected by pathologists.” Finally, it has not been ruled out yet that the DNA can be integrated into the genome and even be inherited by offspring.”

Read entire letter here.


 

Share this...

Arctic 2023 Refuses To Melt…German Scientists Blame “Unusual Weather Phenomenon”

Share this...

16 years of no decline

Arctic summer minimum sea ice extent refuses to drop further, surprising and frustrating the alarmist media.

Image: National Snow and Ice data Center (NSIDC), Boulder, Colorado. 

Hat-tip: Klimanachrichten

German research vessel Polarstern of the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) is currently underway again in the Arctic. where a decrease in sea ice had been expected there, or, probably more accurately said, hoped for.

But this year the minimum Arctic sea ice extent has turned out differently, as Germany’s widely viewed (climate-alarmist) Tagesschau news had to report:

In view of the extreme summer, the question arose in advance: Will the Arctic also see a new negative record in melting ice this year? This time, the Arctic has been spared. AWI director and expedition leader Antje Boetius tells Tagesschau that an unusual weather phenomenon prevented a record melt of Arctic sea ice this summer. According to Boetius, a sequence of low-pressure systems has led to an entirely different ice movement. The so-called transpolar drift, which describes the drifting of ice along certain routes, took a different course this year, she said. Ice from the Siberian region has been held together and compressed instead of drifting out and melting. For the AWI director, this shows that weather phenomena determine the development of sea ice, and that forecasting is more difficult than ever. The Arctic, with its sea ice and life, has been lucky once again, says the biologist. But things could go the other way. “If we are unlucky, if weather phenomena play unfavorably, we can also be affected by large ice-free parts much sooner than expected,” Boetius adds.”

We notice that when the opposite happens, e.g. heat, storms or more melt happens, then it’s all because of climate warming. But when it goes the other way, then it’s weather!


 

Share this...

New Research: Relative Sea Level Along The Coasts Of Japan Has Fallen Nearly A Meter Since The 1800s

Share this...

More evidence emerges suggesting modern relative sea level (RSL) is among the lowest in several millennia. About 7000 years ago coasts were rapidly submerged beneath the sea at rates of up to 22 meters per year.

Ancient shoreline elevation evidence indicates RSL along the coasts of Central Japan has fallen ~0.82 m since the 1800s (Shishikura et al., 2023).

RSL was ~4.2 m higher than present approximately 3000 years ago and still ~2.8 m higher than present about 1500 years ago.

Image Source: Shishikura et al., 2023

From about 8000 to 6000 years ago sea level rise and warming were so rapid that coastlines retreated landward at rates of 22 m per year (Sydor et al.,, 2023). Per the charts shown in the study, there is more coastal land area above sea level today than anytime in 7000 years.

“In the period 8000–6000 yr b2k, the coastline migrated southwards (landwards), initially at a rate of up to 22 m/yr and later up to 2 m/yr. The main driving forces at that time were climate warming and rapid sea level rise.”

Image Source: Sydor et al.,, 2023

Sea levels used to be 4 m higher than today along the coasts of the Yellow Sea about 6500 years ago, or when CO2 was 265 ppm (Yang et al., 2023). 

“RSL [relative sea level] increased quasi-linearly to approximately +4 m [above present sea level] 6.5 ky BP before decreasing to the current sea level (0 m) at a much slower rate.”

Image Source: Yang et al., 2023
Share this...

“A Cleverly Staged Hoax.” …Former German TV Meteorologist Slams “Climate Hysteria”

Share this...

German meteorologist Thomas Globig. Screenshot AUF1

While the system media conjure up the allegedly impending climate catastrophe from morning to night, Austrian alternative media AUF1 reveals the system behind the propaganda.

Hat-tip: PI here

Five top-class studio guests discuss the question: “Deindustrialization, car bans, CO2 dictatorship: Where is the climate hysteria leading?”

In the process, they reveal what is really behind the climate hysteria: a cleverly staged hoax, behind which lie tangible political and economic interests of the globalists.

Thomas Globig was a meteorologist at Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk (MDR) for 20 years. During the premiere broadcast of the new show “Lagebesprechung AUF1,” the meteorologist expressed his critical views on climate hysteria for the first time on television. In the round, Globig explains how weather is misused it for scaremongering.

“In 1911, there were temperatures of 38 degrees and more in Germany. Nobody called for a heat lockdown then. The high temperatures have always been there,” Globig says.

Today, satellites measure ground temperatures from space. “Of course, the ground temperature is much higher when the sun is beating down on it. Weather stations, on the other hand, are mounted two meters above the ground. As a result, significant deviations are possible.”

CO2 is part of the earth and nature

Historian Dr. Holger Thuß is president of the “European Institute for Climate & Energy” (EIKE), which fundamentally questions the thesis of man-made climate change. He is convinced that nature alone is responsible for global climate change. “CO2 is nothing harmful, but belongs to the earth and to our solar system. When politicians fight against CO2, they are actually fighting against nature.”

“Orchestrated scare tactic”

Economist Dr. Eike Hamer von Valtier is a board member at the Mittelstandsinstitut Niedersachsen (Medium Size Companies Institute, Lower Saxony) and editor of “Wirtschaft aktuell” (Business Today), the renowned information letter on the background of politics and economics.

He sees the climate hysteria as an orchestrated scare tactic, behind which lie tangible power interests of global networks: “As always, it’s about power and money.” The CO2 trick is ultimately intended to create planned economic structures like those in the Soviet Union, which are intended to guarantee the globalist circles total control and thus the retention of power.

AUF1 journalist Kornelia Kirchweger, former press officer at the Austrian Federal Chancellery, tells how state officials there are “brought into line.” A longtime observer of international climate change propaganda, she says politicians today  only live in a bubble: “They don’t care about the people.”


 

Share this...

German Professor: Part Of Warming Last 150 Years Due To Measurement Station Siting Changes

Share this...

Urban regions a good 2°C warmer than rural regions

Among other factors, German professor Fritz Vahrenholt looks at the urban heat island effect.
==============================================

By Fritz Vahrenholt

In August 2023, the deviation of the global temperature from the 30-year average of the satellite-based measurements of the University of Alabama (UAH) continued to increase slightly compared to July. The value is 0.69 degrees Celsius and represents the second highest deviation from the long-term average since 1979.

The temperature increase has averaged 0.14 degrees Celsius per decade since 1979. A further rise of this magnitude is no cause for concern, certainly not for panic. The increase in ocean temperature has been 0.12 degrees Celsius per decade; the increase in land temperature has been 0.19 degrees per decade. We will elaborate on why land temperatures are rising.

The heat island effect results when measuring stations that were once located in purely rural areas now find themselves surrounded by populated areas due to urbanization.

Rural vs urban

An example is the Frankfurt Airport measuring station, which 80 years ago had rural areas as its surroundings, but is now influenced by heat-storing and heat-emitting runways, highways, buildings and traffic.

The study concludes that 65% of the 1850-1900 rural monitoring stations are now fully urbanized. Why is this important? The difference in temperature between urban and rural areas is serious; if rural areas become urbanized over time, the respective local monitoring stations will record the higher temperature of the urbanized environment. Accordingly, the locations of the measuring stations have a more important role in the assessment of the global temperature increase than previously thought.

Yearly mean temperatures in rural regions of Munich (gray) and Munich City (blue). Source: Lüning/Vahrenholt Unerwünschte Wahrheiten (Unwanted Truths) 2021.

Since the ratio of measuring stations in the countryside and in the city has shifted by 65% in favor of the cities due to growing cities, this also has an influence on the causes of the global temperature development.

Therefore, part of the warming of the last 150 years in Europe, the USA and, above all, China is due to changes in the environment and not solely to rising CO2 concentrations.

The study concludes that the effect is 0.34 degrees Celsius per century. This does not absolve CO2, but the degree of warming on land would be almost 40 % lower without the heat island effect.


 

Share this...

New Study: Earth Will Cool By 1°C Over The Next Decades Due To The Upcoming Grand Solar Minimum

Share this...

“The first modern GSM1 [Grand Solar Minimum] occurs in 2020 – 2053 with the cycle amplitudes reduction to 80% in cycle 25, to 30% in cycle 26 and to 70% in cycle 27 from the maximum amplitude of cycle 24.” − Zharkova et al., 2023

Per a new study, Earth’s Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) has increased by about 1 to 1.5 W/m² from its depths in 1700 to its “maximum amplitude” in cycle 24 (2020). This resulted in a global temperature increase of about 1.5°C during this span.

“[T]he monthly TSI variations (case a) show the increase of TSI by about 1 – 1.3 W/m² in 2020 compared to 1700. This TSI increase found from the S-E distance ephemeris is close to the magnitude of 1 – 1.5 W/m² reported from the current TSI observations.”

But over the next 30 years (2020-2053) Earth will experience a period of significantly reduced solar activity and a consequent “mini ice age” climate that is “similar to the Maunder Minimum” (1645-1715 CE) that characterized the much-colder-than-today Little Ice Age period.

Temperatures will be reduced by about 1°C during the next few decades; Earth will then be only 0.5°C warmer than it was in 1700.

“Because solar irradiance and the terrestrial temperature already increased since the MM [Maunder Minimum] as is clearly recorded from the terrestrial temperature variations, the terrestrial temperature during the first modern GSM1 is expected to drop by about 1.0˚C to become just 0.5°C higher than it was in 1700.”

Image Source: Zharkova et al., 2023

In the study, no anthropogenic or carbon dioxide concentration contribution to terrestrial temperature change is mentioned.

Share this...

New Study: The Rising-CO2-Causes-Warming Perception Not Supported By Real-World Observation

Share this...

“Oddly, while the principal direction suggested by the models is ΔIn[CO₂] → ΔT, the explained variance is impressively low (10-15%) in this direction and impressively high (reaching 90%) in the opposite direction, at ΔT → ΔIn[CO₂].”  − Koutsoyiannis et al., 2023

One of the most basic concepts in physics is that causes precede effects and effects follow causes. Determining the directionality sequence is thus essential in any causality analysis.

The assumed CO₂→T causality direction cannot be scientifically supported

The assumption in climate models is that CO₂ causes changes in temperature, or T. More specifically, it is assumed modern global warming has been caused by increases in anthropogenic CO₂ emissions.

However, scientists (Koutsoyiannis et al., 2023) have now expanded upon last year’s 2-part study on stochastics-formulated causality published in The Royal Society (Koutsoyiannis et al., 2022 (1) and Koutsoyiannis et al., 2022 (2)) where they notably contend:

“Clearly the results […] suggest a (mono-directional) potentially causal system with T as the cause and [CO₂] as the effect. Hence the common perception that increasing [CO₂] causes increased T can be excluded as it violates the necessary condition for this causality direction.”

A year later these same authors have again conspicuously demonstrated the assumed CO₂→T causality direction cannot be scientifically supported because observations clearly show that variance in T leads or precedes growth rate variance in CO₂ by 6 or more months.

“All evidence resulting from the analyses suggests a unidirectional, potentially causal link with T [temperature] as the cause and [CO₂] as the effect.”

Observational evidence overrules modeled assumptions, regardless of how compelling or mainstream the conventional wisdom.

Image Source: Koutsoyiannis et al., 2023

Cross-correlation analysis reveals CO₂-causes-warming trend alignment depictions are spurious

Because it is widely assumed human CO₂ emissions are the cause and temperature changes are the effect, tendentiously adjusting the axes on graphs to make it appear that the CO₂ and T trends align (i.e., curve-fitting, as shown in the left-side chart below) has become a popular pursuit for those advancing the anthropogenic global warming narrative.

It can be shown, however, that these trend alignments are spurious. Why? Because in the industrial era there have been periods when temperatures have risen rapidly with negligible CO₂ emissions (1700-1750), and decreasing temperatures while CO₂ emissions were rising (1880-1900, 1950-1970). When including all these counter-alignments together and differencing the time series (cross-correlation), the CO₂→T trend alignment disappears. These non-correlations are clearly shown in the right-side charts below. If there are non-correlations, or if the correlations are spurious, causation cannot be established.

Image Source: Koutsoyiannis et al., 2023

Natural CO₂ emissions induced by warming can be shown to be responsible for rising CO₂ concentrations

Fossil fuel emissions amount to 9.4 GtC/year, which is only 4% of the total CO₂ emissions from all sources. In contrast, nature (respiration, freshwater outgassing, fire, volcanism, etc.) produces CO₂ emissions amounting to 216 GtC/year.

It is assumed that the carbon cycle is, in its natural state (without human interference), in perpetual equilibrium, with emissions from natural sources almost perfectly balanced by natural sinks. This presumption is flawed, however, because nature’s sinks don’t decide to only absorb the 216 GtC/year from natural sources as they simultaneously fail to absorb the 9.4 GtC/year from human activities. The 216 GtC/year from nature and 9.4 GtC/year from fossil fuels are instantaneously combined, and nature’s sinks absorb emissions proportionately from the total, ~225 GtC/year.

In their new paper’s appendix, Koutsoyiannis and colleagues have used basic chemistry to show that outgassing from warming and respiration can be biochemically shown to produce emissions rates of 31.6 GtC/year. This is 3.4 times more than the annual emissions from fossil fuels (9.4 GtC/year). Thus, the observation that temperature may potentially a cause of rising CO₂ concentrations appears to be observationally supportable. A substantial portion of modern CO₂ rise may thus be natural.

Image Source: Koutsoyiannis et al., 2023

Natural mechanisms for warming may include the natural increase in sunshine duration

If rising CO₂ concentrations cannot explain modern warming due to the violation of the requisite causality direction, what can?

As has been detailed extensively in many other observational studies, the recent decline in Earth’s planetary albedo (clouds, aerosols) has been reflecting less solar radiation and increasing sunshine duration in recent decades. This, in turn, warms the surface.

A 0.01 change in planetary albedo can induce a radiative forcing of ±3.4 W/m² (Wielicki et al., 2005).

Koutsoyiannis and colleagues cite CERES data that depict a falling linear trend of -0.0019 per decade in planetary albedo since 2000. This can be shown to have elicited a +1.4 W/m² positive imbalance from incoming shortwave, which is sufficient to explain the modern radiative forcing associated with rising temperatures.

So the warming in recent decades may be natural. The CO₂ increases resulting from the natural warming may be substantially natural too. And these results are observationally supportable.

Given the evidence presented in this new study, the claim that human CO₂ emissions are the cause of modern warming is not observationally supportable.

Image Source: Koutsoyiannis et al., 2023
Share this...

Have Sea Level Rise Data Been Faked? Altimetry ‘Corrects’ Non-Trends To Show Rapid Acceleration

Share this...

A stable current global sea level record has apparently been “corrected” to show accelerated rise since the 1990s.

A few months ago we highlighted a new study indicating satellite observations reveal Antarctic-wide ice shelves gained +661 Gt of mass from 2009 to 2019.

Instead of reporting on these actual observations, agenda-driven scientists have long been using an approach relying on assumptions of an unrealistic “steady state” or fixed calving flux (instead of real-world time-variable observations). An assumption-based assessment approach allows estimates a net Antarctic ice shelf change to go from a +661 Gt mass gain to a -20,028 Gt mass loss over this 11-year period (Andreasen et al., 2023).

This is a more than 30-fold distortion of what actual observations indicate.

“Correcting” stable sea levels to show accelerated rise

A few years ago Australian scientists exposed a similar assumption-based assessment approach in estimating trends in global sea level change.

According to long-term global tide gauge data (from the 100 tide gauges with more than 80 years of continuous data), sea levels have been gradually rising at rates of about +0.25 mm/year with no perceptible acceleration since the early 20th century.

Likewise, when satellite altimeters were originally deployed in the 1990s to early 2000s they consistently did “not show any sea level rise.”

A lack of sea level rise didn’t advance the narrative, of course.

So instead of reporting on what the actual satellite observations showed, arbitrary, subjective assumptions were employed to “correct” the data to show sea levels have been rising at rates of 3.2 mm/year instead.

The GMSL satellite altimeter data showed no rising trend for the first 5 years of the record. The first 5 years were then “corrected” to show +2.3 mm/year of sea level rise.

The GRACE satellite data showed the was a -0.12 mm/yr sea level fall trend from 2003 to 2008. After “correction,” this was changed to a +1.9 mm/year sea level rising trend.

“…the untampered results, not showing the desired sea level rise, were replaced by ‘corrected’ results. [U]ntil August 4, 2011 the European Space Agency’s Envisat satellite was showing less than +0.976 mm/year sea level rise since 2004. A few months later, thanks entirely to further corrections, the same data set showed +2.97 mm/year of sea level rise.”

Image Source: Parker and Ollier, 2016

Satellite data reveal coastal land area has been expanding seaward since 1984

A 2021 study (Mao et al., 2021) lends support to what the untampered satellite altimetry data indicated − prior to the assumption-based corrections.

Today there are high resolution satellite images available from Google Earth clearly demarcating global-scale decadal shoreline change since the 1980s. And, despite the “accelerating sea level rise” claims, the 1984-2019 satellite data show coastlines have been expanding by a net +0.26 m/year.

According to Mao and colleagues, Australia’s coasts have been growing at a rate of +0.10 m/year since 1984. Asia’s coasts have been expanding +0.64 m/year. Europe’s coasts are accreting +0.45 m/year. And the African continent has been observed expanding at a +0.31 m/year clip.

The only two continents where coasts have not been observed expanding in recent decades are South America, 0.00 m/year, and North America, -0.29 m/year.

Image Source: Mao et al., 2021

A 2019 global-scale analysis of 709 islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans revealed 89% were either stable or growing in size, and that no island larger than 10 ha (and only 1.2% of islands larger than 5 ha) had decreased in size since the 1980s (Duvat, 2019).

Likewise, the globe’s beaches been growing by 0.33 m/year since 1984 (Luijendijk et al., 2018).

In a press release for 2016 paper on coastal land area changes from 1985 to 2015, scientists acknowledged this:

“We expected that the coast would start to retreat due to sea level rise, but the most surprising thing is that the coasts are growing all over the world – BBC

Claims of dangerously accelerating sea level rise posing an imminent global threat to coasts in the satellite altimetry era may not just be inaccurate. They may be fake.

Share this...

No One Talks About It: Solar System “Climate Change”… Happening Beyond Planet Earth

Share this...

Mysteriously, warming is happening across the solar system. The one common factor is at the center of it all: the sun. 
Artist's Concept of Solar Storm Hitting MarsThe solar system’s powerful sun. Artist’s image of a solar storm hitting Mars, stripping ions from the planet’s upper atmosphere. Image: NASA, public domain. 

Because man is burning fossil fuels, our planet is allegedly becoming increasingly covered by a blanket of “heat-trapping” greenhouse gases, scientists like to make people believe. The recent global warming simply couldn’t have anything to do with the sun, they insist.

They’re likely way off the mark.

Today German prof. Stefan Homburg tweeted a summary of warming that’s happening at other places within our solar system, suggesting the sun is behind it.

“Global warming isn’t only happening on earth,” he tweets.

Triton has warmed 3°K

For example, warming is happening on Triton, Neptune’s moon. According to Germany’s wissenschaft.de: “Neptune’s giant moon Triton is the first body in the solar system where global warming could be detected.”

According to measurements, the atmospheric pressure doubled and the temperature rose 3 degrees Kelvin. “The cause is probably higher solar irradiation of the nitrogen ice cap at Triton’s south pole.”

Mars warmed 0.65°K since 1970s

German online news weekly Stern also reported in 2007: “The average temperature on Mars has risen by about 0.65 degrees Celsius since the 1970s,” citing American astronomers. Blamed here, though, are Martian dust storms. Why would dust storms on Mars be getting stronger? It’s likely linked to increased solar activity.

The Moon 3°C warmer, due to man!

Newly analyzed temperature data show the surface temperature of the moon raised by about three degrees Celsius, reported Germany’s Business Insider here in 2018. But NASA blames the astronauts!  “By walking around and poking at the lunar surface.”

“Climate change” on Pluto

According to www.wissenschaft.de here, Pluto’s atmosphere has warmed to being 40°K warmer than the temperature at the surface (-220°C). The reason for this temperature gradient is the “absorption of sunlight [by methane] reflected from Pluto’s surface into the atmosphere.”

Methane makes up only half a percent of Pluto’s  atmosphere. This small fraction heats the atmosphere in sunlight.

But not only Triton, Pluto and Mars are warming in our solar system, as Prof. Homburg suggests, other planets are warming as well. And there’s only one common denominator: The Sun. Global warming scientists do all they can to ignore this rampaging elephant in the room.

Jupiter’s “planetary heat wave”

Scientists last year found “an unexpected ‘heat wave’ of 700 degrees Celsius, extending 130,000 kilometers in Jupiter’s atmosphere.”

What’s behind it? Jupiter experiences variable intensity auroras around its poles as an effect of the solar wind.

Saturn heating

The surface of Saturn has been “slowly heating up” as well, reports Popular Science here. But NASA blames Saturn’s rings for the recent phenomenon.

According to the paper, the most feasible explanation is that icy ring particles raining down onto Saturn’s atmosphere cause this heating. writes Popular Science. “A few things could be driving this shower of particles, including the impact of micrometeorites, bombardments with particles from solar wind, solar ultraviolet radiation, or electromagnetic forces picking up electrically charged dust. Additionally, Saturn’s gravitational field is pulling particles into the planet while this is all occurring.

Note how it’s never the sun’s solar activity and variability. It’s always some mysterious explanation.

Yet, there’s a reason why it’s called the “solar” system. It’s because the sun is at its center, and so its solar storms and variability impact all the bodies in it.


 

Share this...

Lab Experiment Shows A 2500-Fold CO2 Increase Delivers Surface Cooling, Not Warming

Share this...

In a modified experiment, where IR emission from the heating source is present, no heating but a slight cooling of a black object is found when air is replaced by CO2. The modified experimental situation is also more like the earth/atmosphere situation.”  – Seim and Olsen, 2023

Scientists Hermann Harde and Michael Schnell published a paper in 2021 entitled “Verification of the Greenhouse Effect in the Laboratory.” The study purported to experimentally determine that the atmospheric CO2 greenhouse effect not only exists, but functions in concert with physical laws.

“To our knowledge we present the first demonstration of the atmospheric greenhouse effect in a laboratory experiment, which also allows quantitative measurements under conditions as in the lower troposphere. We use an experimental set-up consisting of two plates in a closed housing, one plate in the upper position heated to 30°C, the other at the bottom and cooled to -11.4°C.”

Thorstein Seim and Borgar Olsen (2023) have analyzed their experimental setup in further detail. They discover that in the Harde and Schnell (2021) greenhouse effect experiment, when the CO2 is increased 500-fold, or from 0.04% (400 ppm) to 20% (200,000 ppm), the plate temperature increases by just 1.18°C. Further, raising CO2 from 20% to 100% (1,000,000 ppm) adds just 0.4°C additional warming (1.6°C).

Since it is assumed that the 100 ppm (0.01%) atmospheric CO2 increase since 1950, from ~310 to 410 ppm, has been the primary cause of 1950-to-present global warming, an experiment that shows increasing CO2 2500-fold (0.04% to 100%) only produces a warming of 1.6°C would hardly appear to support the “verification” of the CO2 greenhouse effect.

Image Source: Seim and Olsen, 2023

But it may be worse than that. Seim and Olsen modify the Harde and Schnell experiment to better simulate “the earth/atmosphere situation.” Instead of modestly increasing the plate temperature by a degree and a half, the modified experiment shows that increasing CO2 from 0.04% to 100% actually cools the blackbody (plate) by about -0.2 to -0.3°C.

The temperature stabilizes at 1.1°C after 150 minutes of heating when only air (78% N2, 21% O2, 0.04% CO2) is used in the container. But when the air is replaced by CO2 (100%), the temperature stabilizes at 0.8°C − a few tenths of a degree cooler. The average cooling when 0.04% CO2 is replaced with 100% CO2 is determined to be -0.22°C.

An observation that shows increasing CO2 by a factor of 2500 elicits cooling in a laboratory is characterized as an “unexpected surprise” by the authors.

Either way, experimental results that show only modest temperature changes occur when CO2 is dramatically increased do not lend support to the “verification” of the CO2 greenhouse effect. And it especially does not validate the popular viewpoint that CO2 is a driving factor in modern global warming.

Share this...

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy

Close