Former NOAA Meteorologist David Dilley Suspects Suppression Of Science At The AMS!

Two days ago David Dilley wrote about the widespread suppression of alternative scientific views on climate change at the academic level, even though these skeptical views are far more in line with observations than the climate model projections.

Today he comments on the apparent suppression of science at the American Meteorological Association (AMS).

The American Meteorological Society (AMS) – Living Up to Their Mission – or Suppressing Vital Climate Information?

By David Dilley (former NOAA meteorologist)

Suppression of science is not only going on at universities and academic institutions, but also at societies and government operated agencies.

The American Meteorological Society (AMS) mission statement claims they are “a prestigious membership scientific society that promotes the development, dissemination and education on the atmospheric, oceanic and hydrologic sciences – and the advancement of their professional applications”. Is there a play on words here – maybe advancement of “their” professional applications? Does this mean they promote only “their” views and not others? Could this mean they are obstructing some advances in science by refusing to consider certain aspects of climate change research, such as natural cycles?

This very well may be the case, especially their statement gives the appearance of a final conclusion: “Warming of the climate system now is unequivocal” and “is beyond what can be explained by the natural variability of the climate”. Further into their mission statement they talk only about warming during the past century, and absolutely nothing about prior climate cycles. Have they taken sides with the aim of promoting only anthropogenic grants and dismiss natural cycle research entirely? Indications that this is so are hard not to notice. How will history judge an institution that excludes the huge factor of solar activity from the climate equation?

AMS Suppression of Science Concerning Natural Climate Change – and Other Views

In my last post we saw that according to Dr. William Gray of the University of Colorado, and other researchers, if you are associated with a university and believe in cyclical climate change rather than anthropogenic induced change, you’ll have to wait until after retirement to publish science that supports alternative views. And then you will still hit major snags, among them cut-off grant money, journals that will you jump through hoops, unreasonably nitpicky editors and reviewers,who often refuse papers simply because they do not like your view.

And the same holds true for private researchers. I submitted a proposed natural cycle paper to the AMS Journal of Climate back in 2007 and promptly received a curt reply by the editor: “not in this journal”. As a result of the obstacles encountered in publishing natural cycle research, I took an alternative route and proceeded online by publishing the EBook “Global Warming-Global Cooling, Natural Cause Found”, which was peer-reviewed by three meteorologists and published online in 2009. It was later updated online in 2012. A video update was published on the NoTricksZone on 12 August 2015: “We Are Now Starting To See A Dramatic Cooling In The Arctic”, Says Former NOAA Meteorologist … “Extremely Cold From 2025 To 2050!

And finally, a few years after my manuscript was rejected by the AMS in a very curt manner, I submitted a membership request in 2010 for my Global Weather Oscillations Incorporated (GWO) to become a corporate member. GWO fulfilled all of the AMS guidelines for membership, yet the board voted membership down 5-0. Prior to the vote the AMS office looked through the GWO web site, and especially our views on climate change. This heightened my curiosity concerning membership denial, so I wrote to the AMS asking why the corporate membership was denied. Their response came about 3 months later: “do not know why“.  I then found out through an AMS employee that during the past 30 years – only 3 corporations had ever been denied membership. So again I tried to find out why by calling the Executive Director of the AMS. His reply: all 5 board members voted not to grant membership and that there were “no records regarding the decision“.   Really? No records or recollection? Does this seem odd?

What are they trying to hide?

5 responses to “Former NOAA Meteorologist David Dilley Suspects Suppression Of Science At The AMS!”

  1. Eduardo Ferreyra

    The American Meteorological Society praises itself as “a prestigious membership scientific society”. They could be somewhat humbler and erase the term “prestigious” from that statement. It is not up to themselves to self praise, but leave the qualifying to other people. As we have seen in the last years, the AMS has been losing its prestige and seriousness thanks to the supression of opposing -and valuable- opinions.

  2. Paul Vaughan

    “How will history judge an institution that excludes the huge factor of solar activity from the climate equation?”

    History will judge most harshly the submissive morons that allowed this.

  3. DirkH

    It looks like the warmunist Enviromafia both sides of the Atlantic tries a GIANT shakedown of the German car industry! What they managed with BP they now try with ALL German carmakers, of course using CO2 as the bludgeon. Well who’s surprised when US / Soros covert ops are running a migration attack on Germany, Obama and his government motors subsidiary via EPA and the German NGO “DUH” (Deutsche Umwelthilfe) at the same time are trying to drive a stake through the heart of the German Diesel engine empire. USA is desparate and wants a total Machtergreifung all across the empire before they go the way of modern times Greece. Trying to scrape every billion of HONESTLY earned money from anyone they can fleece.

    This is ZEIT, an SPD (or CDU, which is today the same) organ:
    “Die DUH will nun vor deutschen Gerichten ein Fahrverbot für Diesel-Pkw erstreiten.”
    “DUH” wants to enforce a total ban on driving Diesel cars in Germany!
    (for allegedly running software in their cars that detect emissions tests profiles and emitting less CO2 during such a test)

    Normally I’d recommend to the ZEIT writers to quit the mushrooms at this point but this is an official outlet of the Empire’s propaganda complex! So this is a serious Obama shakedown via the fake theories of warmunism!

    1. DirkH

      German press release by the DUH goons.

    2. sod

      VW has admitted the manipulation. This is a major fraud and should end with serious punishment for the company and the management.

      And to bring this into context with the original topic here: Supression of science and the truth is constantly happening, but the majority is done by big companies and in the interest of big companies.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy