Over 440 Scientific Papers Published In 2019 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm

Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

In 2019,  more than 440 scientific papers were published that cast doubt on the position that anthropogenic CO2 emissions function as the climate’s fundamental control knob…or that otherwise serve to question the efficacy of climate models or the related “consensus” positions commonly endorsed by policymakers and mainstream media sources.

Image Source: Collins et al., 2019

Image Source: Lüning et al.,2019

Image Source:  Yan et al., 2019

Image Source: Pereira et al., 2019

Image Source: Duvat, 2019

Image Source: Gao et al., 2019

Over 440 scientific papers published in 2019 affirm the position that there are significant limitations and uncertainties inherent in our understanding of climate and climate changes, emphasizing that climate science is not settled.

More specifically, the papers in this compilation support these four main skeptical positions — categorized here as N(1) – N(4) — which question the climate alarm popularized in today’s headlines.

N(1) Natural mechanisms play well more than a negligible role (as claimed by the IPCC) in the net changes in the climate system, which includes temperature variations, precipitation patterns, weather events, etc., and the influence of increased CO2 concentrations on climatic changes are less pronounced than currently imagined.

N(2) The warming/sea levels/glacier and sea ice retreat/hurricane and drought intensities…experienced during the modern era are neither unprecedented or remarkable, nor do they fall outside the range of natural variability.

N(3) The computer climate models are neither reliable or consistently accurate, the uncertainty and error ranges are irreducible, and projections of future climate states (i.e., an intensification of the hydrological cycle) are not supported by observations and/or are little more than speculation.

N(4) Current emissions-mitigation policies, especially related to the advocacy for renewables, are often ineffective and even harmful to the environment, whereas elevated CO2 and a warmer climate provide unheralded benefits to the biosphere (i.e., a greener planet and enhanced crop yields, lower mortality with warming).

In sharp contrast to the above, the corresponding “consensus” positions that these papers do not support are:

A(1) Close to or over 100% (110%) of the warming since 1950 has been caused by increases in anthropogenic CO2 emissions, leaving natural attribution at something close to 0%.

RealClimate.org: “The best estimate of the warming due to anthropogenic forcings (ANT) is the orange bar (noting the 1𝛔 uncertainties). Reading off the graph, it is 0.7±0.2ºC (5-95%) with the observed warming 0.65±0.06 (5-95%). The attribution then follows as having a mean of ~110%, with a 5-95% range of 80–130%. This easily justifies the IPCC claims of having a mean near 100%, and a very low likelihood of the attribution being less than 50% (p < 0.0001!).”

A(2) Modern warming, glacier and sea ice recession, sea level rise, drought and hurricane intensities…are all occurring at unprecedentedly high and rapid rates, and the effects are globally synchronous (not just regional)…and thus dangerous consequences to the global biosphere and human civilizations loom in the near future as a consequence of anthropogenic influences.

A(3) The climate models are reliable and accurate, and the scientific understanding of the effects of both natural forcing factors (solar activity, clouds, water vapor, etc.) and CO2 concentration changes on climate is “settled enough”, which means that “the time for debate has ended”.

A(4) The proposed solutions to mitigate the dangerous consequences described in N(4) – namely, wind and solar expansion – are safe, effective, and environmentally-friendly.

To reiterate, the 440+ papers compiled in 2019 support the N(1)-N(4) positions, and they undermine or at least do not support the “consensus”A(1)-A(4) positions.  These papers do not do more than that.   In other words, it is not accurate to claim these papers prove that anthropogenic global warming (AGW) positions are invalid, or that AGW claims have now been debunked”.

Below are the three links to the list of scientific papers for 2019 as well as an outline to their categorization.

Skeptic Papers 2019 (1)

Skeptic Papers 2019 (2)

Skeptic Papers 2019 (3)

1. Climate Change Observation, Reconstruction (189)

A Warmer Past: Non-Hockey Stick Reconstructions (63)
No Net Warming Since Mid/Late 20th Century (25)
Lack Of Anthropogenic/CO2 Signal In Sea Level Rise (19)
Sea Levels Multiple Meters Higher 4,000-7,000 Years Ago (24)
Nothing Unusual Occurring With Glaciers, Polar Ice (46)
Mass Extinction Events Caused By Glaciation, Sea Level Fall (5)
Ice Sheet Melting In High Geothermal Heat Flux Areas (4)
Abrupt, Degrees-Per-Decade Natural Global Warming (3)

2. Natural Mechanisms Of Weather, Climate Change (131)

Solar Influence On Climate (73)
ENSO, NAO, AMO, PDO Climate Influence (11)
Modern Climate In Phase With Natural Variability (25)
Cloud/Aerosol Climate Influence (3)
Volcanic/Tectonic Climate Influence (2)
The CO2 Greenhouse Effect – Climate Driver? (17)

3. Unsettled Science, Failed Climate Modeling (121)

Climate Model Unreliability/Biases/Errors (26)
Urban Heat Island: Raising Surface Temperatures Artificially (8)
Failing Renewable Energy, Climate Policies (13)
Wind Power Harming The Environment, Biosphere (3)
Corals Thrive In Warm, High CO2 Environments (6)
Elevated CO2, Warmth, Does Not Harm The Biosphere (7)
No Effect Of Elevated CO2 (5000-15,000 ppm) On Human Cognition, Health (2)
Elevated CO2: Greens Planet, Higher Crop Yields (27)
Fire Frequency Declining As CO2 Rises (3)
Global Warming Reduces Mortality. Cold Kills. (7)
No Increasing Trends In Intense Hurricanes/Storms (3)
No Increasing Trend In Drought/Flood Frequency, Severity (4)
Natural CO2 Emissions A Net Source, Not A Net Sink (3)
Miscellaneous (9)

Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

31 responses to “Over 440 Scientific Papers Published In 2019 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm”

  1. Zoe Phin

    I love your annual list. I’ve seen the 2016,7,8,9 list but don’t recall a 2015 or 2014 or 2013 list. I’d like to add it to the poptech list so we have as long a list for all time as possible.

    Maybe you already have something like this?

    On another note, who can solve the mystery of two hemispheres?

    https://phzoe.wordpress.com/2020/01/30/north-and-south-hemisphere/

    1. P Gosselin

      Maybe later I’ll add them – when I get the time.

  2. Marshall Lynn Littleton

    I am helping get the message out there. It seams that some of the MMGW (Man-made Global Warming) lies are getting so convincing that even some “Conservatives” are caving, such as Ben Shapiro. I know that MMGW is a major part of the Communist Globalist agenda to dominate the world, but many still do not.
    Here is one I have been hammering. Why is no one noting the oxymoron that, they want to exterminate 6 to 7 Billion people ASAP in order to save people from MMGW? They say it, write about it, it’s even chiseled in stone! The Georgia Guide Stones, first thing on the list! No thanks I will take my chances with the fiction of man-made Global Warming! My chances are astronomically better!

    1. Zoe Phin

      You’re even better off with Thanos 🙂

    2. raygun

      All we skeptics can do is have faith and lots of activism (political and otherwise) with reading of like info. I have been collecting temp data for the Dallas/Fort Worth (Texas USA) for the last several years and it seems that the early/mid 1900s had the most hot/cold recorded variances with a few since 2000. Definitely not a trend for GW. If anything, some GC and random CC. Regards, retired mechanical engineer, Physicist, Astronomer and petroleum geologiat.raygun

  3. RoHa

    ‘In other words, it is not accurate to claim these papers prove that anthropogenic global warming (AGW) positions are invalid, or that AGW claims have now been “debunked”.’

    Thanks for stressing this. It is important to be accurate when arguing against those who peddle inaccuracy.

  4. Gerald the Mole

    I have just read a book about meteorology that was published in 1962 and was written by the then head of the UK Met Office. The green house effect is discussed and almost completely attributed to water vapour. CO2 is said to have a minor effect on the world’s climate. It would be interesting to know when and why this view was changed.

  5. Hermar

    Two German book recommendations from 2019 that deal with the climate change religion.

    Hans-Jörg Schmidt
    “CO2: Fakten-Check zum Klimawandel: Eine Übersicht zum Klimawandel, dessen Ursachen und den in Deutschland erzielbaren Ergebnissen zum Klimaschutz”
    A master of science explains scientific facts in an easy to understand way for professionals and laymen.

    Michael Grandt
    “Kommt die Klima-Diktatur?: Eine faktenreiche Analyse des grünen Klimawahns”
    A book debunking lies of the climate sectarians and it researches the people behind FFF -> rich investors and greenwashing corporations.

    A nice music video about the leader of the church of climatology:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9GwTbz3b4I

  6. Mark

    Gerald, what is the book called?

  7. Oltre 440 articoli scientifici pubblicati nel 2019 supportano una posizione scettica sull'allarme climatico

    […] Fonte: No Tricks Zone […]

  8. Wird der Februar 2020 kälter und winterlicher als der Januar? – wobleibtdieglobaleerwaermung

    […] Over 440 Scientific Papers Published In 2019 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm […]

  9. Gerald the Mole

    Mark, I am away from home but will get back to you early next week with the full name etc. Rgds Gerald

  10. What Have You Done For The Climate Today? | American Elephants

    […] the other hand, Kenneth Richard of NoTricksZone notes […]

  11. Gerald the Mole

    Mark 31, the book is:

    The Challenge of the Atmosphere

    O G Sutton, former head of UK Met Office

    Hutchinson & Co

    published 1962

    pp12-22 deal with the greenhouse effect

    Regards Gerald

  12. Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #397 | Watts Up With That?
  13. Weekly Local weather and Power Information Roundup #397 – Daily News
  14. Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #397 -

    […] Over 440 Scientific Papers Published In 2019 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm […]

  15. 440 scientific papers last year disputed climate alarm - WND

    […] The papers show that climate science is not "settled," the NoTricksZone blog reported. […]

  16. Von wegen menschengemachter Klimawandel: Mehr als 440 wissenschaftliche Studien belegen das Gegenteil – Die Wahrheitspresse

    […] einschließlich höherer Ernteerträge so das Fazit der wissenschaftlichen Studien, die der Blogs NoTricksZone, zusammenfasste und […]

  17. The Global Warming Fraud | theglobalwarmingfraud

    […] Over 440 Scientific Papers Published In 2019 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm […]

  18. ‘Journalists’ Against Free Speech | No B-S here (I hope)

    […] Footnote:  The would-be censors never specify what it is that “deniers” deny. “They deny the science,” these people claim, unaware or ignoring that “the science” includes annually many hundreds of peer reviewed studies favouring the sceptic case (last year, more than 440). […]

  19. GLOBAL WARMING: “440 scientific papers last year disputed climate alarm” | GachiYellow

    […] The papers show that climate science is not “settled,” the NoTricksZone blog reported…” […]

  20. US bishop Robert J. McElroy says ‘climate change’ more deadly than abortion: Threatens ‘very future of humanity’ | PagadianDiocese.org

    […] year, over 440 scientific papers were published that cast doubt on climate alarmism and the claim that man-made carbon emissions […]

  21. Människofientlig politik kan inte rädda klimatet | KLIMATSANS

    […] den gamle miljöpartisten Peter Groth (PG) i ett inlägg 31/1. Nåväl, här hittar PG över 440 vetenskapliga arbeten, publicerade under 2019 och som på något sätt ifrågasätter den av politiker, media och PG […]

  22. Bishop McElroy: so many issues other than abortion - California Catholic Daily

    […] story, Bishop McElroy’s assertion on climate change was challenged: “Last year, over 440 scientific papers were published that cast doubt on climate alarmism and the claim that man-made carbon emissions are […]

  23. Shades Of “Atlas Shrugged” In Real Life – iftttwall

    […] minds made up for us, and doesn’t want us to consider the possibility that—in light of “over 440 scientific papers published in 2019 [that] support a skeptical position on climate alarm”—she could be spectacularly […]

  24. Shades Of “Atlas Shrugged” In Real Life | Newsessentials Blog

    […] minds made up for us, and doesn’t want us to consider the possibility that—in light of “over 440 scientific papers published in 2019 [that] support a skeptical position on climate alarm”—she could be spectacularly […]

  25. Life site:US bishop says ‘climate change’ more deadly than abortion: threatens ‘very future of humanity’ – chaos

    […] year, over 440 scientific papers were published that cast doubt on climate alarmism and the claim that man-made carbon […]

  26. NoTricksZone:Over 440 Scientific Papers Published In 2019 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm – chaos

    […] Over 440 Scientific Papers Published In 2019 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm […]

  27. 440 Scientific Papers Speak | Thunder on the Right

    […] The papers show that climate science is not “settled,” the NoTricksZone blog reported. […]

  28. Brian James

    February 19, 2020 NOAA warns of risks from relying on aging space weather missions

    WASHINGTON — The head of NOAA’s space weather office used a recent hearing to caution that a failure of an aging spacecraft in the next few years could leave the agency “hurting a little bit” in its ability to monitor solar activity.

    https://spacenews.com/noaa-warns-of-risks-from-relying-on-aging-space-weather-missions/

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy

Close