Scientists continue to affirm the critical role of clouds in modulating the Earth’s energy budget, and, hence, the climate.
The total net forcing of the entirety of the CO2 influence on climate has been less than 2 W/m² since 1750 (Feldman et al., 2015).
Image Source: Feldman et al., 2015
On a per-decade basis, a 22 ppm rise in CO2 – realized about every 10 years in recent decades – is associated with a forcing of just 0.2 W/m² (Feldman et al., 2015), but only when the sky is clear of clouds. And cloud-free skies are rarely ever observed in the real world atmosphere, as “less than 10 percent of the sky is completely clear of clouds at any one time” (NASA, 2015).
The Cosmic Ray-Cloud-Radiation Budget Link Affirmed
In a new study published in a Nature journal climate scientists Dr. Svensmark and colleagues have determined that cosmic rays, or variations in ionization, are strongly linked to the formation of aerosols and clouds, and that “low liquid clouds are mainly responsible for the change in net radiative forcing.”
The decreases in ionization during cosmic ray minima have been observed to occur over 80% of the globe in a matter of days, with the primary responses over the Earth’s oceans. Thus, the response is global in scope.
The magnitude of the effect of solar activity is large, as “Earth absorbs almost 2 W/m2 extra energy within 4 to 6 days of the cosmic-ray minimum” according to the press release for this study. That is the same total net forcing impact in a few days that it takes CO2 270 years to exert.
Image Source: Svensmark et al., 2021
In polar regions, the impact of clouds is even more profound. Within just a few days the downwelling shortwave radiation can vary by as much as ±150 W/m² due to changes in cloud conditions (Djoumna et al., 2021).
Image Source: Djoumna et al., 2021
“Clouds may be the most important parameter controlling…the Earth climate”
Many more scientific studies published in 2021 affirm changes in cloud cover exert the most dominant impact on climate by modulating the Earth’s energy budget. Some of these papers are listed below.
“The clouds represent a key element within the terrestrial climate system. In fact, clouds may be the most important parameter controlling the radiation budget, and, hence, the Earth climate (Hughes, 1983). This is related to the fact that clouds have a paramount importance in the radiation balance at global scale, especially due to their albedo (Ohring and Clapp, 1980).”
“Cosmic rays affect cloud cover variation. Clouds reflect both the incoming solar radiation flux upward and the earth’s thermal radiation back to it. Thus clouds control thermal energy input to the lower atmosphere and establishes a link between cosmic rays and the terrestrial temperature.”
“Clouds play an important role in modulating the heat budget of the lower atmosphere. We know that clouds acting as an opaque medium control thermal energy input to the lower atmosphere. So, one can expect a link between cosmic rays and cloud cover over the earth.”
“Model runs corresponding to past climate show a substantial decrease in low clouds and hence planetary albedo compared with present, which contributes 40% of the required forcing to offset the faint Sun. Through time, the climatically important stratocumulus decks have grown in response to a brightening Sun and decreasing greenhouse effect, driven by stronger cloud-top radiative cooling (which drives low cloud formation) and a stronger inversion (which sustains clouds against dry air entrainment from above). We find that systematic changes to low clouds have had a major role in stabilizing climate through Earth’s history, which demonstrates the importance of physical feedbacks on long-term climate stabilization, and a smaller role for geochemical feedbacks.”
“[T]he presence of cloud-radiative effects shapes the circulation in the present-day climate in many important ways, including the width of the tropical rain belts and the position of the extratropical storm tracks. Cloud locking, in contrast, identified how clouds affect internal variability and the circulation response to global warming. This includes strong, but model-dependent, shortwave and longwave cloud impacts on the El-Nino Southern Oscillation, and the finding that most of the poleward circulation expansion in response to global warming can be attributed to radiative changes in clouds. We highlight the circulation impact of shortwave changes from low-level clouds and longwave changes from rising high-level clouds, and the contribution of these cloud changes to model differences in the circulation response to global warming. The review in particular draws attention to the role of cloud-radiative heating within the atmosphere.”
“Clouds are a prime control of Earth’s energy balance, as they scatter and absorb shortwave radiation originating from the sun, absorb longwave radiation emitted by Earth’s surface and the cloud-free atmosphere, and themselves emit longwave radiation.”
“Overall, cloud-radiative effects play important roles in shaping intraseasonal, interannual, and decadal modes of tropical climate variability. … Clouds, via their interactions with radiation, shape the atmospheric circulation and, consequently, regional climate.”
“Cloud acts as an important and uncertain factor in climate change prediction and simulation (Duan and Wu, 2006). It plays crucial roles in the Earth–atmosphere energy and radiation budgets. Warren et al. (2007) reported significant negative correlations between the summer total cloud amount and surface temperature in the North Hemisphere. The decreased total cloud amount contributes to warming over Tibet (Duan and Wu, 2006; Guo and Wang, 2012). Tang and Leng (2012) emphasized that clouds are an important local factor that adjusts the temperature variation in Eurasia.”
“Clouds are an important factor that influence summer temperature via the energy budget and global hydrological cycle (Tang and Leng, 2013; Yang et al., 2020).”
“The correlations between summer skin temperature and cloud amount reveal that the summer skin temperature has an evident dependence on the cloud amount and varies in different clouds.”
“[S]ummer cloud amount is an important indicator for temperature variations, especially the MHCC. The decreased precipitation matches the reduced TCC. The summer precipitation in Tibet is primarily influenced by the cloud amount, especially HCC and MHCC.”
“Warming and decreased precipitation in the past two decades are primarily related to cloud amount changes.”
“COD [cloud optical depth] variations therefore have a non-negligible impact on the surface radiative balance. For 0-60∘, for example, there is an approximately 200 W/m² difference in SWd [downwelling shortwave] between the optically thinnest and thickest clouds. This translates into a total shortwave cloud forcing that ranges between −20 and −60 W/m², assuming an albedo of 0.8 (typical of the N-ICE campaign April–June period). This range is significant when it is contrasted to the typical longwave forcing of ≈60 W/m²: even for 0-60∘, only the optically thickest clouds could contribute to cool the surface during the April–June N-ICE2015 campaign period.”
“The surface impact of Arctic clouds is also seasonally variable. In October and November, clouds warm the surface: 2 m temperatures associated with cloudless profiles are up to 8 K colder than those associated with profiles containing at least one low cloud.”
11 responses to “In A Few Days Clouds Affect Earth’s Radiation Budget By More Than CO2 Does In 270 Years”
Climate ‘down-welling’ radiation hysteria is caused by a primitive lurch –
Solar Radiation is OUR radiation, and Galactic Radiation is NOT:
but all Radiation is BAD, except OURS course.
A bit like terrorism is bad – except for OUR terrorists.
Such is arbitrary Rules Based Order. A complete rejection of science, a la Huxley.
Meanwhile 25,000 politicians, hangers-on, journalists and maybe a couple of scientists will be flying from across the world to Scotland. They will be burning thousands of tons of hydrocarbon fuel, to fly to Glasgow, releasing thousands of tons of CO2 gas into the atmosphere in the process to attend a meeting meant to convince us not to burn hydrocarbon fuels because this releases tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.
Hypocrisy rules OK within the climate cabal.
This shouldn’t be a surprise, and makes sense.
Recall that I tried a few months back to explain (unsuccessfully) the difference between “solar irradiance” and “solar insolation” to some troll who didn’t know how to be educated…
We should ban clouds now.
We are eating less meat to avoid heating by CO2 😉
Thanks for reminding us of the sane science.
[…] Related: In A Few Days Clouds Affect Earth’s Radiation Budget By More Than CO2 Does In 270 Years […]
Hey Indomitable Snowman, did that guy who who imposed self-uneducation upon himself understand ‘solar’ in the first place? I meet people like him everyday. Their scientific knowledge is below that of an ant.
So, solar max associates with cosmic ray minimum, and an additional 2 W/m^2 of surface warming from more clouds. Do I have this right? If so we need to put to rest the idea that cloud albedo causes cooling. Clouds create a blanket effect and warming instead.
Congratulations to Svensmark(s), Enghoff and Shaviv, who after years of frustrating work, have finally managed to prove that their intriguing hypothesis was correct.
The Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory is finally dead, and this time completely – Not only that it has been proven to be false by countless scientists in countless papers over the past decades, now the alternative theory has been been proven to be right, empirically. This makes a big difference – a difference between a beautiful idea and a real-world, measured and documented physical fact.
Burying AGW will take years, possibly decades, since too many financial and political interests depend on it. But we, humans, know more about the world that we live in, and this is truly a great moment for science.
Simply go to U of Chicago MODTRAN and alter the cloud cover. The impact on W/^2 is astronomical when compared to CO2. A simple cloud layer will alter the energy balance by 80 W/M^2 or more. Doubling CO2 alters it by about 1.6 W/M^2. Also, the oceans are warming, Visible Radiation, mostly blue light, warms the oceans, not LWIR between 13 and 18 microns. Those are the only wavelengths CO2 radiates relevant to the GHG effect.
[…] In A Few Days Clouds Affect Earth’s Radiation Budget By More Than CO2 Does In 270 Years […]