Scientists Now Confirm mRNA Vaccines Produce NEGATIVE Effectiveness Against Omicron

Multiple scientific studies and testing data compiled by national health centers expose the harrowing truth: injection with COVID-19 vaccines actually increase the likelihood of infection with the Omicron variant.

There were 1.61 million new COVID cases confirmed on 29 December. This is hundreds of thousands more than any other single day since the pandemic began.

Over 1 million of these new cases occurred in 5 highly vaccinated countries: USA, France, UK, Spain, and Canada.

Image Source:

Data compiled by the Ontario government show that fully vaccinated individuals have 28% higher COVID-19 infection rates (64 per 100,000) than the unvaccinated (50 per 100,000). On 29 December there were 8,221 new cases in fully vaccinated Ontarians versus 1,514 in the unvaccinated.

Image Source:

An Omicron study from Denmark tells us that within 91 to 150 days after receiving the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots the vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection with the Omicron variant is decisively negative: -76.5% and -39.3%, respectively.

In other words, fully vaccinated individuals are about 40 to 75% more likely to be symptomatically infected with COVID-19 – the Omicron variant – than individuals who have not been vaccinated.

The effectiveness of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines plummets from about 40-50% during the first month to just above 0% 61 to 90 days after the last dose. After 90 days, the vaccines enhance the likelihood of infection.

Image Source: Hansen et al., 2021

The UK government COVID data compiled between 27 November and 17 December show a similarly disappointing pattern in an analysis of 68,489 Omicron cases.

Vaccine (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca) effectiveness against Omicron hovers around 40-60% during 5-9 weeks after the second dose, but then effectiveness rapidly declines to 0% and below (-5% to -15%) by weeks 20-24.

Image Source: UK Health Security Agency

Seventeen scientists published a pre-print analysis online on 15 December reporting the Omicron variant is “remarkably resistant to neutralization by serum” from the widely-used COVID-19 vaccines.

The scientists warn:

“Even serum from persons vaccinated and boosted with mRNA-based vaccines exhibited substantially diminished neutralizing activity against [Omicron].”

“The Omicron variant presents a serious threat to many existing COVID-19 vaccines and therapies” as it “seemingly flattens the antibody therapy landscape for COVID-19.”

“[A] substantial decrease in neutralization of [Omicron] was observed, with mean drops of >6.0-foldand >4.1-fold for the fully vaccinated group and boosted group, respectively.”

Image Source: Liu et al., 2021

Earlier this month scientists publishing in The New England Journal of Medicine (including the USA’s notorious Dr. Anthony Fauci) seemed to concede that Omicron changes the pandemic-response landscape.

They insisted there is already an “urgent need” for new vaccines because mRNA vaccines “elicit transient and incomplete protective immunity” and they are “unable to prevent ‘breakthrough’ infections.” And, due to these “sobering facts,” COVID-19 will “continue to circulate indefinitely”.

Image Source: Morens et al., 2021

The question is why would that be so? A weakened immune system? Let’s hope not because that is the last thing a generally poorly nourished population would need if there’s an influenza outbreak this winter. -PG

31 responses to “Scientists Now Confirm mRNA Vaccines Produce NEGATIVE Effectiveness Against Omicron”

  1. Scientists Now Confirm mRNA Vaccines Produce NEGATIVE Effectiveness Against Omicron – Climate-

    […] Scientists Now Confirm mRNA Vaccines Produce NEGATIVE Effectiveness Against Omicron […]

  2. Mike

    I am continually amazed that information against the vaccines are found on sites that are also against man-made global warming. The two seem to be linked at several points, but I don’t really understand why.

    Somehow, the distrust of governments and their scientists seems to be a common factor, along with the censorship of alternative views on both subjects.

    Where is this going?

    1. P Gosselin

      It’s because the science used in both issues is very shoddy and faulty. Besides, distrust of governments that want to restrict, surveil and tax more and more is a healthy thing. Don’t cry to us – we’re just the messengers of the unmentioned science.

      1. oebele bruinsma

        Very well stated Pierre.

    2. Richard Greene

      The common thread is our recognition of junk science.
      Now encouraged with censorship of opposing views.
      Conclusions reached, and predictions made, based on
      junk science, are not meaningful. We have no idea
      whether they are correct or false.

      I am someone who reports the COVID vaccines are much
      less effective after the first few months,
      and much more dangerous, than promised.

      The claim that some amount of climate change is man made
      is reasonable, but the exact effect of CO2 is unknown.
      Especially unproven claims that CO2 causes all the warming.

      The always wrong predictions of a coming climate crisis
      are not based on data. There are no data for the future.
      The predictions are just speculation, not science.

      Trying to find the truth does not mean one
      is “against” something.

      1. Sommer

        Richard Greene, would you be willing to consider that in both climate change alarmism and in the response to covid, mass formation psychosis has been/is a factor?

  3. Graeme No.3

    Yes, well put Pierre. You might have added that the censorship is in those sites “approved by Mike”.
    Wishing you a Happier New Year.

    1. Mike

      You inadvertently put your finger on a real problem. You made an incorrect assumption about my position and then commented on it. This is the heart of tribalism, and failure to engage in real questions.

      Pierre is amazing, and the AGW narrative is clearly a sham. The vaccine question is pertinent and lots of questions need to be asked.

      My question in this thread stands, and although Pierre made a correct statement (in my view), it still does not answer the question.

      Let us not be afraid of asking questions in 2022, and not jump to conclusions and be guilty of friendly fire!

      Happy new year to all, especially Pierre.

  4. Phil Salmon

    fully vaccinated individuals have 28% higher COVID-19 infection rates (64 per 100,000) than the unvaccinated (50 per 100,000)

    The issue as always with this data is age. Old are hundreds of times more susceptible to covid than young, and vaccination does not completely cancel this out.

    So the above data on vaccinated / non vaccinated groups can’t be interpreted with out knowing the mean or median age of the two groups. Generally the unvaccinated are a lot younger. So the data can be true, but not imply that the vaccines are ineffective.

    Covid vaccine outcome data need to be interpreted in narrow age groups.

    1. William Astley


      The issue is not age but rather the Vit D deficiency of the cohort.

      The data I have seen is the first version vaccines start to fail (vac start to have worse outcome than unvac) for those over 61 years of age and fail worse based on age. Severe Vit D deficiency increases with age.

      The first version vaccines are invoking an immune response that is less effective than an unvaccinated old person.

      The aged are extremely Vit D deficient so their immune systems cannot function normally/optimally. This explains the seasonality of endemic diseases. All cohorts are more Vit D deficient in the winter.

      The body’s cells all make biochemicals to protect the cell and organ from cancer, inflammation, to build muscle, to protect the brain, and so on as well as for other cell functions. The recipe to make the chemicals is found in the copy of our DNA that every cell has in it. Vit D is required to enable the cell to access the DNA. It is used once and then is destroyed in the cell.

      Rather than vaccine again and again, the alternative is to correct the Vit D deficiency, and 71% of the population is also deficient in Vit A.

      Logically correcting all of the deficiencies would stop covid viruses, cancer, and other endemic diseases.

      1. Richard Greene

        Why would Vitamin D deficiencies effect vaccinated people more than unvaccinated people in the winter, when it’s cold outside for everyone, both young and old, so people cover almost all their skin when outdoors.

        I’ve been taking 4,000 IU Vitamin D for over 20 years, and not getting much sunlight in any season. So I’m not against Vitamin D supplements.

    2. Richard Greene

      Age correlated with severity of symptoms, hospitalizations and deaths.
      Not much with infections case counts.
      Case counts correlate well with the number of tests.

    3. Paul Stevens

      The other factor that needs to be examined is the behaviour of fully vaccinated people. Do they make assumptions about their immunity and therefore act in ways they previously wouldn’t? I would suggest, based on casual observation, that they do. Does this behaviour expose them more to a more easily transmissible form of the virus. I would imagine it does. Are the changes in their activities and the ease of transmission sufficient to contribute significantly to the rise in cases? I don’t have the data, but it seems likely.

  5. John R Walker

    The fully ‘vaccinated’ are more gullible therefore more likely to continue being tested. There are now c. 8 times more ‘vaccinated’ than un’vaccinated’ in the UK, USA, and other western countries.

    The un’vaccinated’ do not feel the need to be continually tested for the same reasons they don’t feel the need to take ‘vaccines’ which do not prevent infection or onward transmission and were not designed to do so. The jury is out on whether they provide the stated prophylactic benefit against symptom severity, hospitalisation, or death. In the clinical trials the bars for safety and efficacy were both set VERY low.

    Personally, I fear the sub-optimal leaky ‘vaccines’ more than the virus. Happy to let my immune system make its own comprehensive responses to the whole SARS2 virus rather than rely on transient sub-optimal antibodies against just the spike proteins.

    1. Adam Gallon

      The unvaccinated have a high proportion of nutters amongst them, who deny the very existence of Covid-19, think it’s due to 5G, an evil plot by Bill Gates and a host of other equally lunatic ideas.
      These people can usually be found amongst the equally lunatic fringe, who still believe Trump’s the real POTUS, the answer to gun crime is more guns and God’s real.

      1. P Gosselin

        I guess that the vaccine fails to protect after a few months and boosters are required over and over are just fantasy

      2. spike55

        “and God’s real.”

        Yes Bill Gates is a catholic, and believes God is real….

  6. Richard Greene

    I’m going out on a limb, without reading more
    than the summary of the studies here:

    In my opinion the conclusion is baloney
    (malarkey for the Irish)

    Based on common sense and first hand experience
    with friends:

    Vaccinated people stop, or reduce, their
    social distancing, making them more vulnerable
    to infections.

    That’s why the vaccinated are more likely to get infected.

    There is no evidence that vaccines have any direct positive or
    negative effect on the infection rate. But social distancing
    practices sure do, especially with the very easy to spread Omicron.

    I may be wrong about this,
    but that is not on the top
    of my list of possibilities.
    ha ha

    Everyone have a safe New Year’s Eve.

    1. Fran

      Here in BC Canada, there is no evidence that vaccinated are more socially active and therefore more likely to get infected. They seem more scared of the virus and more enthusiastic about wearing masks, even outdoors. They are also the ones who rush to get boosters.

      1. Richard Greene

        Here in Michigan it is not a close call.
        The vaccinated / boostered are not avoiding indoor parties
        and other crowded venues, but the unvaxxed are,
        almost without exception for dozens of people I know,
        including me and the wife.

        Masks don’t do anything so wearing them
        or not wearing them is meaningless.

        Both the vaccines and boosters do not stop infections.
        There is no evidence so far that they cause more infections
        although that’s a possibility.

  7. Miguel

    “The negative estimates in the final period arguably suggest different behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This was likely the result of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through single (super-spreading) events causing many infections among young, vaccinated individuals.“

    This post is very unserious and I would say that it is also pretentious (it casts doubt on the criteria of the blog’s main content).
    It makes no sense to claim that vaccines can be counterproductive, and even less to claim that scientists say so. the conclusions reached by the researchers are very different: “In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.”

    1. Richard Greene

      “In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.”

      Very consistently the “researchers” for COVID have proven they have no idea what they are talking about. Just like climate science “researchers”. If you want to believe the “government truth”, don’t waste your time here. We are interested in real science, not junk science and politics, and fake government “experts” like Fauci.

      In real science there are a lot of “we don’t knows”
      In junk science there are none — just trust the government
      bureaucrat “experts”, who are only experts in their own minds.

      Meanwhile, more American died with COVID in 2021, with vaccines, than in 2020, with no vaccines, and new cases are setting records. The vaccines have the worst side effects of any vaccines in US history. They have failed to deliver what was promised in late 2020. If that is a success, I’d hate to see a failure.

      There is no evidence the vaccines have any effect on Omicron infections.
      The vaccines have no effect on infections, whether Alpha COVID, Delta COVID or Omicron.

      Omicron is not COVID
      The 30 mutations of the spike protein mean the vaccines will be worthless, or nearly worthless. The unusually mild symptoms are equivalent to any coronavirus common cold, and that’s what it is.

      The vaccines are designed to reduce serious symptoms of a very different
      virus. Omicron rarely has serious symptoms, So there are rarely any serious symptoms to be reduced. Boosters may be somewhat worthwhile but data are very preliminary.

      Forget the science for a moment:
      Omicron is spreading like wildfire and there is no evidence COVID vaccines are helping. Omicron evolved to EVADE vaccine induced antibodies and even natural COVID antibodies.

      This evolution to a much less deadly variant has happened repeatedly in the history of virus pandemics over the past 100 years.

      The viruses mutate to survive.
      They need a live human or animal host to survive.
      They need to evade antibodies.
      History is repeating itself.

      1. Miguel

        I do not believe in governments, I believe in the academic training that I have had as a pharmacist…

        After exposure to an antigen, it is impossible for the infection to be favored with that same antigen. Studies can have meaningless results for multiple variables that have not been correctly measured, raised, and so on.

        In my country, the incidence is breaking records but not the deaths or the ICU admissions, this is happening right after the vaccines. This suggests that the reason is these. If the reason is that Omicron is less virulent, I don’t know. But, the other variants are still present. On the other hand, Omicron is thought to come from Africa, I suppose that the antibodies that he may have had to evade are mostly natural

  8. Scientists Now Confirm mRNA Vaccines Produce NEGATIVE Effectiveness Against Omicron – Infinite Unknown

    […] – Scientists Now Confirm mRNA Vaccines Produce NEGATIVE Effectiveness Against Omicron […]

  9. richard
  10. Sam

    Why focus on the “science” of Covid when it’s all about politics?

    A perceptive 10 year old can see, and could see FROM THE START, that Covid-19 has nothing to do with real science (ie, it’s a s c a m).

    YET… most people –including scientists, academics, doctors, and other formally educated folks– are rather profoundly perplexed and befuddled by the various absurdities of the Covid disaster (e.g., the back-and-forth shifting of scientific decrees, the censorship of valid data, the fraudulent fabrication of exaggerated numbers of “covid cases,” etc.). They cannot really make sense out of it all. At best, they can DESCRIBE the absurdities but they cannot explain WHY it is happening and explain WHAT the governing authorities truly are.

    Why is that? It is because they lack pieces of vital knowledge, a lack that hinders and disables accurate coherent full understanding (therefore, it impairs the proper decision-making process and the potential for profound constructive action).

    Those “missing” pieces of knowledge right in front of our noses are described in a comprehensive article called “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room –The Holocaustal Covid-19 Coronavirus Madness: A Sociological Perspective & Historical Assessment Of The Covid “Phenomenon”” at

    Without a proper understanding, and full acknowledgment, of the true WHOLE problem and reality, no real constructive LASTING change is possible for humanity.

    If your employer (even educational or federal employers) wants you to take a Covid vaccine give him/her one of these form letters of exemption found at or

    “2 weeks to flatten the curve has turned into…3 shots to feed your family!” — Unknown

  11. Yonason

    Dr Malone addresses that and lots more in this excellent podcast

  12. Yonason

    Dr Malone addresses that and lots more in this excellent podcast

    Very informative.

  13. Vědci teď potvrzují, že mRNA vakcíny vytváří vůči Omikronu NEGATIVNÍ účinnost -
  14. Billy

    It has been obvious for some time, from the case and death data from UK, Canada and others that there is no protection from infection. That was never claimed and not tested for. Only reduced symptoms, and now we see that that was data fraud in the Pfizer study.

  15. Phil Salmon


    You are a vigorous antivax blogger and as I have said to others on climate blogs, the antivax position is an embarrassment to climate skepticism and threatens to utterly discredit it. To say “vaccines are ineffective” you need to examine the detailed findings of clinical trials and real world vaccine outcome data and specifically identify the flaws, if any. Not just brandish some social media circulating factoid which, as discussed above, usually amounts to just the failure to adjust covid outcomes to age. Pensioners are a thousand times more susceptible to covid than teenagers. Non vaccinated people tend to be younger. All the “vaccines don’t work” factoids are based on failing to notice the difference between a teenager and a pensioner. An outcome of darkness and alcohol but not science! Please stop – you’re smarter than that.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy