Net Benefit: Rising CO2 Improves Essential Crop Yields 3% Per Year – Critical to Feeding The World

Share this...

The elevated CO2 fertilization effect is driving global greening trends, pushing back deserts, enhancing photosynthesis by 30 to 50%, improving water use efficiency, and boosting crop yields by about 3% every year since 1961. 

Recently atmospheric CO2 has been rising at a rate of about 3 ppm per year. While activists claim this is an existential problem for the climate, there will be a critical need for food production as the world population grows by another billion in the coming decades.

The good news heralded by a new study finds gross primary production increased by over 30% over the 2oth century, and the global maize, rice, soybean, wheat yields have increased by ~3% per year since 1961.

There are 2 main reasons for the rapid increase in crop yields in recent decades: “technological progress and CO2 fertilization” (Altimonti et al., 2022). Likewise, the root of the modern global greening phenomenon “pushing back deserts around the world” and improving water-use efficiency is “the increase of atmospheric CO2.”

Image Source: Alimonti et al., 2022

Another new study documents a 30 to 50% increase in photosynthesis with elevated CO2 (eCO2, 451 to 720 ppm) and a ~25% increase in crop yield. The authors cite results indicating grain yield may increase 54% when CO2 concentrations rise from 400 to 700 ppm. In the study the highest temperatures (21-25°C) were associated with the best yields, whereas the lowest temperatures (<15°C) were linked to the worst yields.

Image Source: Gardi et al., 2022

Gardi et al., 2022

An increase in atmospheric CO2 generally exerts beneficial effects on plant biomass by increasing net photosynthesis by 30 to 50% and reducing photorespiration (Drake et al. 1997; Poorter and Navas 2003; Schapendonk et al. 2000). This has been studied for cereals including barley, wheat, rice, oat, and rye (Conroyac et al. 1994; Kimball et al. 2002; Long et al. 2006). For instance, in a meta-analysis comprising 79 crops and wild species, Jablonski et al. (2002) documented an increase in yield of 28% averaged across crops and wild species due to elevated CO2 (eCO2). A climate chamber experiment with 700 ppm CO2 on barley reported an increment of grain yield by 54% compared to 400 ppm (Alemayehu et al. 2014), while 47% enhancement of grain yield averaged across two genotypes was reported by Schmid et al. (2016) under eCO2 level of 550 ppm. Moreover, Manderscheid and Weigel (2006) evaluated the effects of eCO2 on barley using Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) at 550 ppm, and obtained yield increases of 7 and 15% under the combination of eCO2 with low and high N supply respectively.”
CO2 enrichment increased aboveground biomass (23.8%), grain number (24.8%), and grain yield (27.4%). The magnitude of the responses to eCO2 was affected by genotype, temperature, nitrogen, and CO2 exposure methods. Genotype “Anakin” shows the highest CO2 response of aboveground biomass (47.1%), while “Bambina” had the highest grain number (58.4%). Grain yield response was observed to be higher for genotypes “Alexis” (38.1%) and “Atem” (33.7%) under eCO2. The increase of aboveground biomass and grain yield was higher when plants were grown under eCO2 in combination with higher N (151–200 kg ha−1). The interaction between eCO2 and three different temperature levels was analyzed to identify the impacts on barley yield components. The results revealed that the CO2-induced increase in grain number and grain yield was higher in combination with a temperature level of 21–25 °C as compared to lower levels (< 15 and 16–20 ).”

Another just-published study indicates “wheat yields could be enhanced while crop water use is reduced because of climate change” in the coming decades. Wheat yields dramatically improve in tandem with increases in human CO2 emissions, increasing by 23%, 29%, and 54% for the lowest to highest emissions scenarios, respectively.

Govere et al., 2022

“Climate change is a major concern in wheat agroecosystems as it can affect productivity and crop water use. This study used the AquaCrop model to evaluate climate change impacts on the wheat yield, crop water use and water footprint of wheat production in the Middle-Manyame sub-catchment of Zimbabwe. Climate scenarios were based on simulations from the NCC-NorESM1-M, CCCma-CanESM2 and MOHCHadGEM2-ES General Climate Models downscaled using three Regional Climate Models (RCA4, RegCM4 and CRCM5) under two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). The results showed that, compared to the baseline climate (1980–2010), yield may increase by 22.60, 29.47 27.80, and 53.85% for the RCP4.5 2040 s, RCP4.5 2080 s, RCP8.5 2040 s and RCP8.5 2080 s scenarios, respectively. Crop water use may decrease by 1.68, 1.25, 3.7 and 6.47%, respectively, under the four scenarios, respectively. Consequently, the blue water footprint may decrease by 19, 23, 24 and 38%, respectively, under the four scenarios. Sensitivity analysis attributed the increase in yields and the decrease in crop water use to the CO2 fertilization effect, which had a dominant effect over high-temperature effects. The results suggest that future wheat yields could be enhanced while crop water use is reduced because of climate change.”

Scientists affirm there is “undoubtedly a ‘fertilization effect of CO2′” in improving the growth and yield of fruit trees (Fischer et al., 2022). Plants grow 30% faster with 600-750 ppm CO2, and “1,000 ppm of CO2 will be optimal for the photosynthesis of various plant species”.

Fischer et al., 2022

“Generally, elevated CO2 (e-CO2) positively affected fruit trees, such as increased photosynthesis, efficient use of water, growth, and biomass. Therefore, in many cases, the yield and the quality of fruits also increased. With an e-CO2 of 600-750 ppm, most C3 plants will grow 30 % faster. A total of 1,000 ppm of CO2 will be optimal for the photosynthesis of various plant species. Fruit trees typically grown in Colombia, such as citrus, grapevines, strawberry, papaya, and pitaya, would benefit from these positive effects, as e-CO2 alleviates stress due to drought and waterlogging. However, the increased growth of fruit trees due to e-CO2 requires more nutrients and water. Thus, selecting genotypes that benefit from e-CO2 and have high efficiency in using nitrogen and water is very important. Ideally, they must have a high sink strength to avoid the accumulation of carbohydrates in the chloroplast. The authors conclude that there is undoubtedly a “fertilization effect of CO2” on fruit species that increases with the advance of climate change. Still, much research is lacking for fruit species compared to many other crops. Hence, future studies are required to measure the direct effects of atmospheric e-CO2 and its interactions with environmental variables such as rainfall, temperature, soil moisture, and nutrient availability.”
Share this...

15 responses to “Net Benefit: Rising CO2 Improves Essential Crop Yields 315 Per Year – Critical to Feeding The World”

  1. Net Benefit: Rising CO2 Improves Essential Crop Yields 3% Per Year – Critical to Feeding the World - Climate- Science.press

    […] Net Benefit: Rising CO2 Improves Essential Crop Yields 3% Per Year – Critical to Feeding The W… […]

  2. John Hultquist

    “Recently atmospheric CO2 has been rising at a rate of about 3 ppm per year.”

    The 3% in the above sentence seems to be confused with the “crop yield”.
    Only in 2016 did the increase reach and slightly exceeded that at 3.03 with
    an uncertainty of 0.11 ppm. 1998 was next highest but was only 2.97.

    https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/gr.html

    For the past 10 years an average of about 2.4 ppm/year is a good estimate. This doesn’t change the theme of these reports.
    The difference of 0.6 doesn’t seem too important, but over 50 years it would give “Climate Cult” members a brain seizure.

    [On a personal note, all this extra growth also occurs with the brush that I have to keep cutting and disposing of. Fuel for wildfires is an unwanted consequence.]

    1. voza0db

      nowadays majority of fires are caused by uman animals…

      1. John Hultquist

        In the western USA, 84% of wildland fires are a result of some form of “uman animals.”
        Most are not intentional; rather such things as auto accidents, poor wiring to an out-building (such as a chicken house), a spark from broken equipment, and many others. Some are arson.
        A couple of fires now burning in Oregon and Washington are from lighting. One, 60 miles NW of me, is believed to be human caused, but the specific cause has yet to be announced.

        There are more people doing more things and invasive grasses are an issue: see Downy Brome.

        1. voza0db

          In the Plantation I slave on the % is even bigger!

          “forest fires, both in respect to the number of occurrences and in the size of burnt areas, especially during the summer season, when the high temperatures and the drying fuel generates an environment favorable to the spread of fires, whose ignition has its origin in human acts, negligent and intentional, in more than 90% of the cases.”

          So… whether with natural “fuel” or without it we sure like to burn stuff!

        2. pochas94

          Yes, people cause wildfires, but they are also getting pretty good at at putting them out. This is an important skill. Maybe the acreage consumed by wildfires will come under reasonable control.

        3. Richard Greene

          Up to 90% of forest fires have manmade causes, including tree limbs taking down electric wires. There is no logical connection between tiny changes in the global average temperatures and humans starting more fires. There could be a connection with precipitation, but rainfall has been increasing with global warming. The result: No reason to ever blame the number of forest fires or acres burned on climate change.

  3. voza0db

    It’s strange to see that umans are still wasting Time and other Resources looking at stuff it’s known for quite some time. At least since we know that Plants use CO2 as “food”!

  4. Hiding The Hot Past In Australia – Newsfeed Hasslefree Allsort

    […] Net Benefit: Rising CO2 Improves Essential Crop Yields 3% Per Year – Critical to Feeding The World […]

  5. Indur Goklany

    I would normally agree but warmists skipped Biology 101 where they should have learnt that more CO2, more plant mass, higher yields. In addition, they have a tendency to reject facts that does not align with their preferred narrative. So you have to beat them on the head over and again short memories in the vain hope that someday they will see the light.

  6. Richard Greene

    Another great Richard article
    While the effect of CO2 enrichment varies by type of PLANT, IT IS ALMOST ALWAYS GOOD NEWS FOR GROWTH RATES AND LOWER WATER USAGE FOR C3 PLANTS. Often a small advantage for C4 plants. I have read over 200 plant – CO2 enrichment studies in the past 25 years — over 95% had significant good news from CO2 enrichment. Most of the others were for C4 plants. A good 20-page summary of a 1000+ page pdf of plant studies is here:

    http://climatechangereconsidered.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/CCR-II-Biological-Impacts-full-report.pdf

    1. voza0db

      I guess the trend is for 1000+ pages pdf’s!

      This one explaining how we’ll never achieve a 1st generation renewable energy production civilization is also a must…

      “Assessment of the Extra Capacity Required of
      Alternative Energy Electrical Power Systems
      to Completely Replace Fossil Fuels”

      https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354067356_Assessment_of_the_Extra_Capacity_Required_of_Alternative_Energy_Electrical_Power_Systems_to_Completely_Replace_Fossil_Fuels

      FUN LONG reading… Just to reach the obvious conclusion.

  7. Richard Greene
  8. Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #520 – Watts Up With That?

    […] Net Benefit: Rising CO2 Improves Essential Crop Yields 3% Per Year – Critical to Feeding The W… […]

  9. Science and Politics News Roundup 2022 September | wryheat

    […] 50%, improving water use efficiency, and boosting crop yields by about 3% every year since 1961. (Read more) […]

Leave a Reply

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy

Close