What follows is a critical article written by Jens Meyer-Wellmann appearing in German national daily Die Welt that got by me a couple of weeks ago.
The title: “Scientists should not play priest…Climate scientist von Storch accuses his colleagues of spreading panic – and sees no major consequences coming from a dredging of the Elbe River“.
Sebastian Lüning’s and Fritz Vahrenholt’s blogsite www.kaltesonne.de presented an excerpt of the Die Welt article, which I’ve translated in English:
‘Unfortunately in climate science there is a tendency to proclaim absolute truths and to link these immediately to instructions on actions to take,’ von Storch said. ‘The climate pope tells us what has to be done, and for the people it’s: keep your mouths shut. Scientists have been taking over the roles of medicine men and priests. That’s not the job of scientists. Science is supposed to help understand problems, show the possibilities that exist in dealing with them. The best is to show many possibilities. Then the political process has to decide the path to take.’
But some of his colleagues in science like to use ‘stories that point to a catastrophe,’ said the professor of meteorology. One example was the assumption that our region would see ‘murderous violent storms’. But there was no data showing this. ‘It all has a cultural, anthropological background’ . ‘If you sin, then you will be punished. And the punishment always takes on an environmental dimension which also included storms in the past. In former times it was God’s punishment. Today it’s punishment by Nature. Nature is to keep man in check. And for this we see idiotic films like ‘The Day After Tomorrow.’’
With ‘snappy’ and short statements like ‘snow will be a thing of the past’, the loud speakers among the scientists are putting the credibility of science at stake.'”
More info on Hans von Storch here. He also runs the climate blog klimazwiebel.de and is co-author of the recently released book: The Climate Trap: The Dangerous Proximity of Politics and Climate Science.
Graphic: Rembrandt depiction of prophet Moses, public domain work.
Strangely Germany’s Jochen Flasbarth’s UBA (which is like the USA’s EPA) didn’t mention von Storch or Spiegel on its “black list” in its latest pamphlet. Cowards.
Maybe in the case of Der Spiegel they carefully weighed the evidence and found the paper as more of a useful tool than an obstacle to their plans. It’s strange that they came to the opposite conclusion in the case of Die Welt – Die Welt has been absurdly alarmist; but maybe straid too far off the plantation now.
Maybe a warning – get in line or be strangled. For instance by denying Welt journalists access to NATO and EU etc circles.
They must be pretty desparate; usually such pressure is applied behind the scenes.
For German readers, it looks like the air is getting very thin for Rahmstorf and Flasbarth’s UBA and other priests…h/t a reader
http://www.heute.de/Klimawandel-Skeptiker-amtlich-unerwünscht-28010994.html
If I may comment. I think the term used should be Prophet not Priest.There were many types of prophets in Ancient times many of the false gods or Baals of the time had schools of prophecy which were rich and famous.
. Moses in the picture was a lawgiver. see Ten Commandments
[…] https://notrickszone.com/2013/05/18/climate-scientist-hans-von-storch-warns-climate-scientists-have-b… […]