(UPDATE: 5 October 2019) It was a well executed hoax. https://cliscep.com/2019/10/04/aoc-trolled-by-swiftian-satire/ (Note: A number of US Democrats and activists support late-term, partial birth abortions, so it’s not unreasonable to think this was real).
UPDATE 4 Oct 2019: https://www.climatedepot.com/2019/10/04/watch-aoc-duped-by-climate-trolls-unbelievable-plea-to-eat-the-babies/
There’s little doubt among the many cooler skeptic heads that the global climate change movement has gone off the rails in terms of sanity, and continues to do so in a spectacular fashion.
The madness has arrived.
The latest example is presented to us by Ryan Saavedra of the Daily Caller. One of AOC’s constituents hysterically claims that eating humans, as suggested by one Swedish professor, isn’t going to cut it when it comes to rescuing the planet. Her solution:
“We need to eat the babies!”
One of Ocasio-Cortez's constituents loses her mind over climate change during AOC's townhall, claims we only have a few months left: "We got to start eating babies! We don't have enough time! … We have to get rid of the babies! … We need to eat the babies!" pic.twitter.com/uVmOnboluI
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) October 3, 2019
First, if I were a policeperson, I’d certainly would look to see if that insane woman might be missing any kids, or if her neighbors are missing any – seriously. If not, that poor woman needs psychiatric care very quickly.
One thing we note when we scan the faces in the crowd, is that they don’t show even an inkling of happiness at all. They are all frozen in depression, frustration and anger. If you’re in a good, happy mood, then standing less than 30 seconds in that room will change that. The hysterical woman shows that things are progressing from depression and anger to insanity.
How can people allow themselves to be talked nto depression, and later a level of insanity put on display by Ms. Baby-Eater?
It shouldn’t surprise us that when people like Greta and the lunatic media spread all the panic and fan the flames of irrationality, it’s just a question of time before those already on the fringes start falling off the deep end and potentially become a real danger.
Ms. Baby-Eater herself likely used to be one of those depressed, angry faces in the crowd. Then enter Greta and the media.
It’s also astonishing that AOC fields the question and comments as if it were a legitimate one. She should have simply just called the woman’s rant for what is was: utter lunacy. But then again, we live in times where very-late term abortions are okay!
I suspect this is just the beginning. Never underestimate the potential of human insanity, especially when it’s claimed to be backed by “science”. History is filled with such monumental tragedies.
It’s time to take the kooks out of the solution-making and handing that responsibility over to cooler heads.
14 responses to ““Climate Protection” Obsession Moves From Depression To Insanity…”Need To Eat Humans, Babies!””
Which is it I wonder, a young lady reduced to hysteria by the CC propaganda, or someone using parody to show just how idiotic folk like AOC are?
I was asking myself the same question. But it looks awfully real to me.
See Jonathan Swift : A Modest Proposal For preventing the Children of Poor People From being a Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and For making them Beneficial to the Publick
Published anonymously in 1729, for obvious reasons, suggesting that the impoverished Irish might ease their economic troubles by selling their children as food to rich gentlemen and ladies.
The biting irony of course might be lost on psychotics….
Homor is actually very good medicine, large doses recommended.
These Extinction Rebels are the unspeakable in pursuit of the inedible!
Beware of climate zombies !
It fooled me for a while, because she is such a good actress, but it is a parody
I vote for satire: https://cliscep.com/2019/10/04/aoc-trolled-by-swiftian-satire/
If these people could only see the previous article they would be even more miserable:
55 New (2019) Scientific Papers Link Solar Activity To Climate Change
Bonbon is spot on as always. I think this could go down as one of the political interventions of all time. It was meant as a parody and was intended to expose the green lunacy for what it is. The person intervening is a part of the LaRouche movement. They have for the past 50 years led the fight against cultural and intellectual degeneration, particularly in the west.
Lyndon LaRouche? Seriously?
“To say that Lyndon was slightly paranoid would be like saying the Titanic had a bit of a leak.” – Jim Bakker
“As a young adult, LaRouche seemed to reject his upbringing [as a Quaker] and became a socialist ideologue, but his rambling and paranoid style increasingly sidelined him within that marginal faction.”
“He once called for all AIDS victims to be quarantined, referred to Zionism as ‘cult nonsense’ and said the Holocaust was ‘mythical’.”
If Lyndon Larouche was the only champion you could find in the fight against cultural degeneration of the West, then you haven’t been looking very hard.
You are quoting mainstream media sources for heavens sake. These are the same sources that have lied through their teeth to us about Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, the CAGW nonsense (I could go on, but you can hopefully see where I am going with all this). Have you actually read the material that is published on the LaRouche sites? If so, then you’d know that the NYPost etc had completely the wrong idea about Mr LaRouche.
In addition, I never said he and his movement were the only ones fighting against the degradation of culture and science in the west. Whilst I applaud your efforts in exposing the nonsense that comes out of the CAGW true believer camp, might I suggest that you have perhaps misunderstood in this instance?
”might I suggest that you have perhaps misunderstood in this instance?” – Josh
NY POST is not a Leftist rag.
LA Times, while Leftist, occasionally gets stuff right.
Just because Larouche is right about climate change is no reason to reference him, as it gives credibility to his other screwball ideas. There are plenty of sane alternative opponents of AGW nonsense, that I don’t need to embrace a nut like him.
He was a screwball.
Deal with it.
Here’s a little more on your precious Larouche and those who love him.
Thanks, but no thanks.
[…] Watts doesn’t get it (though several people in the comments do), and nor does Pierre Gosselin. The Breitbart article only says towards the end that it’s not clear if it’s real or […]
What do you say after somebody spouts such nonsense? Human stupidity knows no bounds, once again.
Caused a lot of commotion in the listening audience. After the fake activist advocated eating babies, much chatter ensued.
Looks all fake, can’t really be serious, you’ll be trafficking humans.
Parody or not, hard to laugh, humor in anything, corruption in anything, you can’t have both. Talk like that is indicative of the individual being corrupted, not really what a human is, something other than what it should be is what you have.
You’ll find yourself in the loony bin, you’re gonna make a trip to the funny farm, they’re coming to take me away.
Really good acting, shark jumping nonpareil.
There is no need for it in any setting.
Difficult to generate any sympathy for AOC, she has created the scenario.
“If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would promise them missionaries for dinner.” – H.L. Mencken
I agree the young lady intervening at the AOC meeting with devastating Swift satire should get the Emmy Award or an Oscar for the best performance this year.
She captured the hysterical climate monotone perfectly!
Classical art to fight cultural degeneration!