Declaration Of Medical Independence …Medical Treatment Is Between Doctor And Patient, Period

Personal Health is solely between the patient and physician, and not the business of crazed medical Nazis. My Declaration of Medical Independence

In Europe some countries have been brutally trampling on the fundamental rights and liberties of citizens, all under the guise of health protection. The usual genetically fascist countries, e.g. Austria, Italy and Germany, have enacted mandatory vaccinations, or plan to do so, and have long since been relentlessly coercing and harassing its citizens to get the vaccine against their inner wishes.

Countless thousands have been injured or killed since the “emergency” vaccines began to be administered. It’s time to draw the red line.

Using the brilliant U.S. Declaration of Independence as a blueprint, I tailored my own Declaration of Medical Independence, which I am now publishing here openly. It’s to all governments who have plans to enact mandatory vaccination. I’ll fight to defend this fundamental right to the very end. Millions of others will do the same.

Currently, Germany is pushing forward to make vaccinations compulsory and doesn’t care a bit about the concerns of millions of individuals. Given its history medical atrocities, you’d think the country would know better. Already the Ministry of Health has announced that it intends to make contracts with Big Pharma to supply COVID vaccines through the year 2029!

I don’t want the garbage and refuse it. There is already ample evidence that the substance is toxic and could very well ruin your immune system. No one knows how bad it’s going to get. Imagine if it ruins your immune system. You’d be forever dependent on Big Pharma to keep you alive. I have no intention of letting myself get hooked up to a Big Pharma garden hose.

A doctor I know recently told me the whole thing is already dangerously going out of control and advises against the vaccine.

8 responses to “Declaration Of Medical Independence …Medical Treatment Is Between Doctor And Patient, Period”

  1. Petit_Barde


    I’m French and I entirely support this sensible and humanistic declaration.

  2. Kevin a

    A MUST WATCH: Dr. Sam Bailey
    The Truth About Viruses

  3. dodgy geezer


    Now get your doctor, who is only allowed to practice if he complied with all government requirements, to sign up to it as well….

  4. Declaration Of Medical Independence …Medical Treatment Is Between My Doctor and Patient, Period – Climate-

    […] Declaration Of Medical Independence …Medical Treatment Is Between Doctor And Patient, Period […]

  5. David

    A long time fighter of bad medical practices and Big Pharma is Dr Vernon Coleman. Dr Coleman said that the threat of covid-19 had been wildly exaggerated and that there was no pandemic.

    1. Adam Gallon

      Dr Coleman is what’s known as a Fucking Idiot.
      He’s on record as saying that AIDS can’t be transmitted by heterosexual intercourse.
      There was, indeed still is, a Covid-19 pandemic.
      Luckily, it’s not been as deadly as MERS.
      If you’re in a high risk group, then common sense says get vaccinated, same as you would for influenza.
      Mandatory vaccination, is another thing all together. It should be your personal choice.

  6. drumphish

    Dr. Benjamin Rush signed the US Constitution and also advocated medical rights be written into the document… for physicians to freely practice their own brand of medicine. Dr. Rush’s medical practice was dubious at best, bloodletting doesn’t work all that well.

    The Father of American Medicine, was pretty much a quack and was suspected in bleeding George Washington to death.

    Be happy Benjamin Rush didn’t succeed in having a right to practice medicine by any means necessary. Or maybe he did succeed.

  7. Hans Konrad Johnsen

    Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: UNESCO

    Article 3 – Human dignity and human rights

    1. Human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms are to be fully respected.

    2. The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.

    Article 6 – Consent

    1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

    2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.

    3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy