Sunspots and Temperature

Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

Ed Caryl, author of One Of Our Hemispehere Is Missing and A Light In Siberia, brings us his latest essay. If history is an indicator, then today’s simultaneously declining PDO and AMO, in combination with a solar quiet period, mean that a “rapidly cooling situation” may be in the works, or we could even be “headed for a new ice age”.

Sunspots and Temperature
by Ed Caryl

Sunspots have been tracked systematically since 1700. Temperature has been recorded in Central England since 1659. We can compare these two records and measure the relationship. Both are plotted below.

Fig. 1: Sunspot activity and temperature

First, note that the trend lines for both temperature and sunspot number are parallel. Annual sunspots have been increasing since the Maunder Minimum at about 10 spots per century. Temperature has been increasing at about 0.4°C per century.

Sunspots drive the solar output. Here is a plot of solar irradiance as reconstructed by Judith Lean. (Lean, J. (2000). “Evolution of the Sun’s Spectral Irradiance Since the Maunder Minimum”. Geophysical Research Letters 27 (16): 2425–8. doi:10.1029/2000GL000043.)

Below, the irradiance data is plotted against the temperature data seen in Fig. 1 above. The irradiance is in watts per square meter. Notice that the since the Maunder Minimum, the irradiance as increased by almost 3 watts/m2, on the same order as the supposed recent CO2 warming.

Fig. 2: Temperature and Solar Irradiance

Fig. 2: Temperature and Solar Irradiance.

Figure 3 follows, and is a scatter diagram of solar irradiance and temperature. Note that it also shows a trend of 1 degree from minimum irradiance to maximum. That also corresponds to 0.4 degrees per century.

Fig. 3: Temperature versus Irradiance

Another thing to notice is that warming takes place immediately as sunspots and irradiance increase, but cooling seems to be delayed by a few years. This is likely due to the oceans’ “flywheel” effect on land temperatures, as has been noted by Juraj Vanovcan here. The oceans take a long time to react to solar influence.

What does this say about the future?

The land temperature at the end of the Maunder Minimum was still falling after 50 years of no sunspots and minimum irradiance. During the Dalton Minimum from 1800 to 1835, it took almost 20 years for the Central England temperature to react by cooling. Other cooling events, in 1740 and 1880, have happened faster. The reaction time depends on timing with ocean cycles.

The Dalton Minimum took place during a high point in the PDO, but the PDO was falling in 1880. At this time, 2010, PDO has fallen, and AMO is starting to fall. With the solar cycle staying low, we may be in for a rapidly cooling situation.

What is the current irradiance? It is 2 watts/square meter below the minimum shown by Judith Lean, above. Hopefully there is a 2 watts/square meter offset error in her 2000 reconstruction, or we are headed for a new ice age.

Fig. 4: Solar Irradiance Trend. Source: here.

What about CO2? According to the U. K. Met Office, the rise in the Central England temperature record after 1974, “has been adjusted to allow for urban warming”. They don’t reveal what those adjustments were, so that portion of the record should be taken with a grain of salt, especially the last 10 years. No other evidence of anthropogenic temperature rise can be seen.

Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

6 responses to “Sunspots and Temperature”

  1. TinyCO2

    Does this help explain what they’ve done with respect to UHI, etc?

    http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/Parker_etalIJOC1992_dailyCET.pdf

  2. Bernd Felsche

    I did a quick-and-dirty analysis of temperature vs insolation using the datacollected by a local agricultural research station which measures actual solar radiation at ground level.

    The correlation wasn’t brilliant but the curves show that there was a lag between insolation and temperature. Correlation improved markedly when plotting the temperature a month after insolation. This indicated either a measurement artifact or likely substantial thermal capacity in the soil. (or something that I can’t think of)

    The time series is short; only 15 years, so useless for “climate” studies. If I had the time, I’d play with the numbers a bit more; using daily figures instead of monthly which’d allow me to fine-tune the thermal delays in heating and cooling. Being an ag. research station, they also record temperature just underneath the surface which should be more useful as an indicator of the heat stored in the surface than the air temperature some distance above the surface.

  3. James Hutchisson

    Excellent piece. A typo exists where an irradiance decrement is cited. I believe 3 milliwatts is intended rather than 3 Watts? Watts up with that! Regards

    1. Ed Caryl

      Nope, it’s 3 Watts/square meter.

  4. R. de Haan

    Russians predict:
    Coldest winter in 1000 years?
    http://rt.com/prime-time/2010-10-04/coldest-winter-emergency-measures.html

    Could be caused by climate change!

  5. wade

    well it seems like we are going to be hit by another freezing winter here in the UK and with sunspot activity so low 22spots currently the argument for a correlation is compelling to say the least.

    http://101realglobalwarmingfacts.blogspot.com/

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy

Close