UPDATE: See debate video in German:
All Stocker had for arguments was: 1) insisting Mann’s phony hockey stick was still valid 2) claiming there’s scientific consensus, and 3) we can trust the models! All three of course have long been proven to be false.
Their science is that bad, folks. I never would have believed it. Using an old discredited science, the IPCC is really looking like a bizarre end-of-world comedy act.
It’s clear why IPCC scientists don’t like debating – and prefer insisting that we just believe them.
There are other nuances I found entertaining, and I’ll try to bring these up today, time permitting.