My Open Call To The New York City Police Department – To Report Obvious Fraud Now In Progress At NASA GISS

What follows is not crazy – it’s what we used to call “civic duty” by caring citizens.

This is my open call to the NYPD, 26th Precinct, 520 West 126th Street, New York, NY 10027, Tel. (212) 678-1311, webpage here. This is the precinct responsible for NASA GISS, Columbia University.

It wouldn’t be the first time civil disobedience inciter and Data-Dr. James Hansen is apprehended for breaking the law.

I am officially reporting, to the NYC police, NASA-GISS scientist James Hansen, pictured above, for manipulating and falsifying U.S. Government temperature data, with the likely intent to defraud U.S. citizens. He has been caught red-handed by Steven Goddard and other experts, not just once but on multiple occasions. All witnesses are urged to notify the authorities and to provide evidence of Hansen’s activity so that the authorities can properly investigate what plainly appears as criminal activity in broad daylight and, as duty calls, to render protection to the public they have sworn to serve. Tel. 212-678-1311.


Hansen’s statement in 1999: NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?, Here Hansen writes on US temperature trend:

Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought, when the Mississippi almost dried up. And 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s “Dust Bowl” that caused an exodus from the prairies, as chronicled in Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath. […]

….in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country.”

Since then, he has since doctored the data and claims today it is now warming rapidly.

Yet, look at Hansen’s US temperature chart in 1999, source: http://stevengoddard.wordpress/:

Compare the above chart to his new, doctored chart, now being used to defraud the US and world public, source: http://stevengoddard.wordpress/:


The next chart is a comparator to illustrate Hansen’s handiwork in misleading the public:

Before – after. Source: http://stevengoddard.wordpress/

Suspect Hansen is being aided and abetted by a white, balding male, donning a goatee, who appears to be Hansen’s assistant and goes by the name “Gavin”.

Hansen has already once been arrested by authorities before, see above photo, and attempted to incite civil disobedience. He seems to think he’s above the law.

Now what follows is the latest rock-hard evidence of Hansen’s data doctoring to produce the warming results he wants to see:



Steven Goddard here writes today:

Until about ten years ago, NASA showed the US on an 80 year long cooling trend, with the three hottest years being in the 1920s and 1930s. They have deleted the raw data from their website and blocked archiving, but John Daly captured it. It was originally located at this link:”

Request for police to investigate

Citizens should not be afraid to report any wrongdoing to the authorities, no matter what the stature of the suspect may be. There is nothing illegal about it. Moreover, it is your civic duty to do so. Do not let yourself be intimidated. This has got to be done.

Hansen has been caught red-handed, and the police are obligated to carry out their duty and investigate, and, if necessary, apprehend the suspect so that he may face eventual possible legal consequences.

Hansen is a high-ranking NASA scientist. However, in a nation of justice, authority and prestige at any level do not put anyone above the law. It’s what has made America fair and great. Yes, even people of high positions can be complete dirtbags, too – just like any other person among us. Let the evidence be presented and to speak for itself.

James Hansen’s justification for “adjusting” the US temperature will likely be the kind you’d expect to hear from a rapist gynecologist, claiming he was only examining his patient and looking out for her health. In Hansen’s case, the evidence is overwhelming showing he has been doctoring and manipulating US government data – to mislead the public on climate change.

We expect the authorities to take action to protect the public and to begin investigating immediately, as required by law.

Numerous parties have witnessed this data falsification and are ready to make sworn statements and provide overwhelming evidence, like that provided above. Witnesses with evidence are urged to call the police at the above mentioned number.

Let’s see if there is any justice left in America. Personally I’m confident the NYPD will handle this professionally and respond accordingly.

Citizens all over America and around the world are getting awfully damn tired of being defrauded by this obviously blatant data manipulation.

So NYPD, there’s a big fish out there waiting for you! There’s enough evidence out there to put him away for years.


18 responses to “My Open Call To The New York City Police Department – To Report Obvious Fraud Now In Progress At NASA GISS”

  1. My Open Call To The New York City Police Department – To Report Obvious Fraud Now In Progress At NASA GISS | Cranky Old Crow

    […] My Open Call To The New York City Police Department – To Report Obvious Fraud Now In Progress At N…. Like this:LikeBe the first to like this. […]

  2. Harry Dale Huffman
  3. Nonoy Oplas

    Good move Pierre. I hope the NYPD will act on your letter. Meanwhile, El Nino 2012 seems to be cancelled. Nino region 3.4 now approaching zero, instead of 1.0+ C and rising.

  4. Open Call To The New York City Police Department To Report … | HelloBlvd Cities | Hello Blvd | HB | HBC

    […] here: Open Call To The New York City Police Department To Report … […]

  5. Bernd Felsche

    What’s this talk about meteorologists in the Netherlands being held liable for incorrect forecasts and throwing them in the clink if they get them wrong? Have they been portraying their forecasts with the certainty of climatologists?

  6. Simon

    Why just JH & G, why not also MM in the corresponding jurisdiction, and also AG?

  7. Hugh Evan

    Some formal sources could be handy to find out where the graphs were possibly based. Note differences between meterological years and calendar years used in smoothing.

    Figure 6: US mean temps with 1930’s peak at 1.5
    Annual and 5 year running-mean surface air temperature (meteorological year,
    December-November) for the contiguous 48 United States relative to the 1951-1980 mean.

    Plate A2a: US mean temps with 1930’s peak at 1.3
    Annual and 5 year running-mean surface air temperature for the contiguous 48
    United States relative to the 1951-1980 mean for several choices of station data

    “We present results for the calendar year, January-December, rather
    than the meteorological year as in Figure 6, thus allowing a test of the sensitivity to that choice and helping comparison with other results that employ the calendar year, such as those of Bell et al.”

    By the way, a second adjustment of the peak is shown in this Hansen paper, graphs at the end:
    Plate 2. (a) Surface air temperature anomaly relative to 1951-1980 averaged over the contiguous 48 United States for the USHCN data [Easterling et al., 1996a] and for the GISS analysis of GHCN data; (b) effects of the adjustments in the USHCN analysis [Easterling et al., 1996a] averaged over the
    contiguous 48 U.S., (c) effects of the homogeneity adjustments in the GISS analysis on the U.S. mean temperature.

  8. Skeptics Pursue Mass NY Police Complaint Against Climatologist James Hansen | johnosullivan

    […] climate data rigger misappropriating tax payer funds to ply junk science on U.S. policymakers.   Gosselin continues, “I am officially reporting, to the NYC police, NASA-GISS scientist James Hansen, for […]

  9. Robert

    It’s fun seeing where your charts come from… Steven goddard is a well known “knownothing” about climate science.

  10. Mindert Eiting

    Just a few notes (the reply button does not work). Bernd: I have never heard of prosecution of Dutch meteorologists for wrong forcasts and I don’t think we will get here Italian drama’s. The issue is not about erroneous forcasting but data fraud. We have here the interesting case of the frauding psychology professor. The latest news is that he will be criminally prosecuted for frauding with subsidies. Apparently, data fraud as such is not a crime here but the financial aspect may make it a crime. What is the legal situation in the US? Pierre: I have read somewhere that also Moncton is collecting evidence with regard to the prosecution of climate fraudsters. What is his opinion in this case? The work of Steve Goddard is of great value and the contribution of Harry Dale Huffman is worth noting. You have my support.

  11. My Open Call To The New York City Police Department – To Report Obvious Fraud Now In Progress At NASA GISS | Knowledge Wealth Centre

    […] My Open Call To The New York City Police Department – To Report Obvious Fraud Now In Progress At NASA GISS Posted on November 22, 2012 by admin P Gosselin […]

  12. Kelly Sarod

    Somebody seems to have forgotten that the Bank of International Settlements controls most of the world’s military industrial complex.

  13. NoFreeWind

    So Robert, you don’t want to read anything from Steve Goddard, you only want to read stuff written by your own “ilk”. That way your mind stays pure.

    Well, here is the original link to the Hansen 1999 paper, trying to explain why US temperature were lower in 1999 than in the 1930’s. By almost .5C
    you can scoll down in that NASA site, and see the paper this brief is referring to .

    Then go here and chart the data as it currently stands. Plug in Annual and from 1895 to 1999.

    Now in the new, improved version of US temps, 1999 is 3F higher than 1895, and higher than the 1930’s. So somehow things got adjusted about 2F UP!

    Now plug 1999-2011 into that NCDC site, and you’ll find 2011 about 1F lower than 1999. So
    if you join the 1999 Hansen chart with the 1999-2011 NCDC chart, you end up with 2011 being about as warm as 1895 and a full 1C cooler than the 1930’s.

    Seriously, finding this FRAUD is so easy a 6th grader could do it.

  14. Recent Energy and Environmental News – 7th December 2012 « PA Pundits – International

    […] Hansen should be prosecuted. […]

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy