Germany’s Energy Woes Set To Continue As Government Stays Stuck On Wishful Thinking

Monthly newsletter from Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt

(Translated, edited by P. Gosselin)

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen
The most exciting question in terms of energy policy in the coming months is just how intense is the winter going to be.

The German DWD Weather Service reassured the German government and public in November: “The German Weather Service’s winter forecast is good news for all energy consumers. We expect a comparatively mild winter. If the model proves to be right, we will be able to save heating energy as a result.”

Winter not cooperating…colder than expected temperatures

That sounds like governmental whistling in the woods by now, because the latest medium-range weather forecasts from the European ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) predict a sharp cooling by the 4th of Advent (see below the forecast for the 4th Advent, source:


Source: Dr. Roy Spencer

The graphs above show the cold weather extending from Poland to northern France. France’s electricity consumption, a significant portion of which is used for heating, has a major impact on electricity supply and electricity prices in Germany in the absence of sufficient nuclear capacity.

For those who want further daily information, please refer to the Where’s the Global Warming page.

UAH drops 0.15°C 

Globally, the indices also show no warming (Dr. Roy Spence). The deviation of the global temperature from the 30-year average of the satellite-based measurements of the University of Alabama (UAH) has decreased from 0.32 degrees to 0.17 degrees Celsius in November 2022 compared to October. The average temperature increase per decade since 1979 is still 0.13 degrees Celsius – no indication of a worrying or even catastrophic trend.

On the contrary: sea ice extent in the Arctic has increased again since 2016. Since 2016, global temperatures have been declining slightly.

How long will the stored gas last?

“The availability of energy for electrical power generation is assured for this winter,” said German Economics Minister Robert Habeck, Green Party, at a press conference in South Africa on the security of electricity supply in Germany. But if we analyze where the electricity is coming from in Germany these days, it is anything but reassuring.

In the diagram below, we see the power generation since December 1st. Solar energy has delivered practically nothing, wind energy suffers from a persistent lull. As of 3 p.m. on Dec. 10, 60 gigawatts of electricity were being consumed. Solar (light yellow) supplied 0.7 GW, wind onshore (light green) 1 GW, offshore (grayish green) 1.6 GW, natural gas (light brown) 16 GW, coal (dark brown) 12 GW, and lignite (medium brown) 14.6 GW.

How can Germany go without coal, nuclear?

Even nuclear power (red), which is in its final days of operation, supplied 3.8 GW, more than solar and wind power combined. How should Germany be supplied in such situations, if in 2024 the added coal and lignite power plants have will all have been taken off the grid and the nuclear power plants have already been switched off in April 2023?

Energy plan means “electricity prices will continue to go through the roof”

Look below at the light brown area in the graph of electricity from natural gas, the most expensive power generation with the scarcest energy we have. However, if expensive fracking gas is to additionally replace the dark brown and medium brown areas of lignite and hard coal and the red areas of nuclear energy, then we already know today that electricity prices will continue to go through the roof. The  current coalition government would not survive that.

Even a moderately cold winter presents the government with barely solvable problems. The storage facilities are already emptying at a rate of 0.5% per day. Anyone can calculate how long storage facilities, which are 94% full (Dec. 10, 2022) and, according to the federal government’s specifications, should still have a 40% storage level in February, will last if the cold continues.

It may just be fine with luck. But what will happen next winter?

In view of this state of affairs, how can the Chancellor roundly reject the extraction of gas from shale rock? Quote: “Investments in German shale gas production would hardly be worthwhile because it would take too long to use domestic sources – by then gas demand will have decreased significantly.”

There are three mistakes in this statement: it is economically worthwhile because it would be 1.) much cheaper than US fracking LNG gas, 2.) it would also take only one year until the first gas could flow (which would be the case now if the German government had acted responsibly) and 3.) gas demand will by no means decrease. Three mistakes in one sentence with fatal consequences for Germany as a business location is not something you hear every day from a German chancellor.

After a gas and electricity crisis, now also an oil shortage

Before the Ukraine war, Russian oil covered 35% of the oil needed in this country. Although there is still no European import ban on pipeline oil, Economics Minister Habeck had promised the EU that as of January 1st, no more oil would be sourced via the Druzhba pipeline, which supplies the Schwedt and Leuna sites. The alternative supplies via Rostock or Gdansk will only cover part of the pipeline imports. Politicians are keeping silent on the price.

Added to this are now the EU’s boycott decisions: oil supplier Russia is to be paid only $60 per barrel of oil, although the world market price is significantly higher. Putin has already stated that Russia will not supply on these terms. Now there are two possible consequences of the EU decision. Russia has already acquired a shadow fleet of 100 tankers to transport its oil to other regions. If Russia succeeds in placing all its oil with other market participants such as India or China, this would have few consequences for all market participants – except for Germany, which has so far imported cheap pipeline oil from Russia.

However, if Russia does not succeed in placing all its oil, there would be too little oil on the world market. OPEC+ has already announced that it will not increase oil production. In this case, oil prices would rise while demand would remain the same worldwide. Such a boycott would probably be called a knee-jerk reaction.

With best wishes for a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Fritz Vahrenholt


4 responses to “Germany’s Energy Woes Set To Continue As Government Stays Stuck On Wishful Thinking”

  1. MGJ

    People need to overcome their addiction to government. No matter how often governments create a huge mess, which they blame on the bugbear du jour (Capitalism, the Russians…etc.), most people still run to the government to spend vast amounts of other people’s money to sort it out – which they never actually succeed in doing.

    If the Chancellor believes investing in shale gas extraction or nuclear power is not going to help then fine. The same for any alternatives. But if there is an entrepreneur who believes otherwise then get the hell out of the way and let them get on with it, using their own money and reaping the rewards or penalties themselves.

    Unlike politicians, for whom there is no downside to getting it wrong (indeed it can be highly lucrative), the entrepreneur is risking everything and will need a very persuasive case to attract the resources required.

    In whichever area you look, government programs have a near perfect record, not just of failure, but of achieving the exact opposite of their stated goal. Energy policy being one of the more obvious ones.

  2. Michael Peinsipp

    To the German bureaucrats who laffed at President Trump…Who’s laffing now OR Who’s freezing their hineys off now?!!!?

  3. Astralis

    The power distribution diagram is impossible to read. Can you provide a link to the source?

  4. Yonason

    ” The German DWD Weather Service reassured the German government and public in November: “The German Weather Service’s winter forecast is good news for all energy consumers.” – article

    Yeah, that’s sort of like what the Met office told the citizens of the UK, and look what happened…
    “…Met Office admitting there is ‘a bit more than we thought’ “

    A “bit?”

    LOL Thy were off by a mile,. Oh, sorry, they were off by 1.6 kilometers. Hmm, nope, accurate but doesn’t compute.

    Anyway, maybe “the new guy” Isn’t fully trained yet. (Alternatively, he’s been trained all too well)

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. More information at our Data Privacy Policy